Yes, the miz is bigger but the moments look similar -right?

Cheers MC

DSK wrote:

The navigator© wrote:


Why do you say that? I'd say the foretriangle matches the mizzen quite
well.


Lots of forces in play here, Navvie©. The horizontal distance (in two axis
as the boat heels) between the sails CE and the boat's CLR, the torque
developed by the hull & foils, etc etc.

If you're talking about Mari-Cha 4, it looks to me that the mizzen is far
bigger than the foretriangle.


If the C of E of the main matches the CLR (as it should for a
balanced ketch) then she will balance under miz and foresail.


Sure.

"In theory there's no difference between practice & theory. But in
practice, there is."

Not all ketches balance the way they should. Possibly due to different
priorities on the part of the designer, possibly by error, whatever.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

The navigator© wrote:

Yes, the miz is bigger but the moments look similar -right?

Doesn't look anywhere close to my eye, but they could be anyway.

Obviously a lot of very careful engineering went into this boat. The question
is, is balance under jib & mizzen on the list of design priorities, and how well
did they achieve it?

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

Well I see it like this: Why not go for balance. If the main blew you
would not want a horribly unbalanced racing boat!

Cheers MC

DSK wrote:

The navigator© wrote:


Yes, the miz is bigger but the moments look similar -right?


Doesn't look anywhere close to my eye, but they could be anyway.

Obviously a lot of very careful engineering went into this boat. The question
is, is balance under jib & mizzen on the list of design priorities, and how well
did they achieve it?

Fresh Breezes- Doug King