On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:48:04 -0600, "Lady Pilot"
wrote:


I don't feel like what I said was drawing any conclusions but the basic
principle I was taught by my flight instuctors. They always said, "make
little corrections, and then see what happens...".

They were teaching you the basics of piloting and aircraft opertion.
They were not instructing you on a type rating on a transport category
aircraft. There is a big difference in technique and purpose.

You are still learning to read, you are not quite ready to critique
Hemingway.

. As an instructor, tell me what my instructors told me that was wrong?

For the aircraft you were flying, the conditions and your abilities,
nothing. That does not mean that have learned everything about flying
every airplane in every configuration and condition and can
pontificate on what that crew did wrong.

I am never quick to judge a pilot for any mishaps! I don't know where you
came up with that conclusion.

I came up with it from this statement:

" I'm the one who brought up the pilot's incompetence. ...
If this guy was one of my pilots, I would have a talk with the DO
(Director of Operations) and have the guy reviewed.
On the other hand if he was my DO, I would seriously be
looking around for someone to replace him."

I was just parroting what I was taught and
why the pilot in question made a few errors in judgement, in my opinion.

"Just parroting" what an instructor tells an ab initio student and
applying that to an entirely different circumstance in a very
different type of aircraft is a large error in judgement and that is
not just an opinion.

Don't just parrot., try and learn what it means and why so you can at
least paraphrase it.

Rick