Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

Sure... $5. That's all either of them are worth. I'll pay you via
PayPal if I'm wrong. How about you?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Put some money where your mouth is . . .


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...

My prediction... Bushy and Chumpy are out of here next
election.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

The war against terrorism involves more than overt
action. There is a lot of covert stuff going on as well.

Countries who may not openly agree with covert action
still are supporting with the covert action and other
less violent action such as drying up funds terrorists
transfer from bank to bank to finance operations.

Your logic is faulty. There exists no corner into
which I can paint myself in this case. There exists
only the facts the link displayed to your chagrin those
facts being that ALL the NATO nations are with the
USA in the war against terrorism. That the majority
of nations don't provide soldiers to fight in Iraq does
not belie the fact they are with us in the war against
terrorism.

And, attempting to change the subject only shows that
you cannot argue with these facts. You lose yet again!


S.Simon



"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

And what do you have against reprisals against
terrorists and governments that support terrorism?

S.Simon


Capetanios Oz wrote in message ...

Says a lot Cappy.
Plenty of countries are doing what they can to work against
terrorists.
The US with the aid of a couple of others, is the only one that has
invaded countries and killed tens of thousands in what can only be
seen by the vast majority as reprisal attacks.

Is the US now the new Israel?


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:47:35 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote:



The war against terrorism involves more than overt
action. There is a lot of covert stuff going on as well.

Countries who may not openly agree with covert action
still are supporting with the covert action and other
less violent action such as drying up funds terrorists
transfer from bank to bank to finance operations.

Your logic is faulty. There exists no corner into
which I can paint myself in this case. There exists
only the facts the link displayed to your chagrin those
facts being that ALL the NATO nations are with the
USA in the war against terrorism. That the majority
of nations don't provide soldiers to fight in Iraq does
not belie the fact they are with us in the war against
terrorism.

And, attempting to change the subject only shows that
you cannot argue with these facts. You lose yet again!


S.Simon



"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--






Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

Israel would have to be considered bad, or wrong in some way, for the
way they are dealing with their own, long standing terrorists. Most of
the non-terrorist supporting world have no qualm with the way Israel is
handling terrorists inside their boarder, and I, for one, am glad they
are doing their part to keep the terrorists on the run so they cannot
regroup and cause another 9/11 elsewhere.

Your attempt at an insult is laughable to the civilized world.

(but now we know a little more about what makes you tick)


Capetanios Oz wrote:
Says a lot Cappy.
Plenty of countries are doing what they can to work against
terrorists.
The US with the aid of a couple of others, is the only one that has
invaded countries and killed tens of thousands in what can only be
seen by the vast majority as reprisal attacks.

Is the US now the new Israel?


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:47:35 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote:



The war against terrorism involves more than overt
action. There is a lot of covert stuff going on as well.

Countries who may not openly agree with covert action
still are supporting with the covert action and other
less violent action such as drying up funds terrorists
transfer from bank to bank to finance operations.

Your logic is faulty. There exists no corner into
which I can paint myself in this case. There exists
only the facts the link displayed to your chagrin those
facts being that ALL the NATO nations are with the
USA in the war against terrorism. That the majority
of nations don't provide soldiers to fight in Iraq does
not belie the fact they are with us in the war against
terrorism.

And, attempting to change the subject only shows that
you cannot argue with these facts. You lose yet again!


S.Simon



"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--






Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

Yes sir tell that one to Genghis Khan, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Hirohito,
etc. The whole key to the thing is total defeat. One cannot wuss
around like you pacifist liberal fools and allow it to go on and on.

Any enemy soundly and thoroughly defeated is an enemy no longer.
The whole of history proves this fact.

S.Simon


Capetanios Oz wrote in message ...

Ummm reprisals bring reprisals until soon no-one remembers who started
it....if they can now.

You didn't get my Israel reference?


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:08:58 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote:

And what do you have against reprisals against
terrorists and governments that support terrorism?

S.Simon


Capetanios Oz wrote in message ...

Says a lot Cappy.
Plenty of countries are doing what they can to work against
terrorists.
The US with the aid of a couple of others, is the only one that has
invaded countries and killed tens of thousands in what can only be
seen by the vast majority as reprisal attacks.

Is the US now the new Israel?



Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

Donal wrote:

"Simple Simon" wrote
Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.

If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

It's just a matter of who's ox is getting gored. Saddam was indisputably
supporting Palistinian suicide bombers who attacked Israel. If you see
these bombers as terrorists then you must admit that Saddam was
supporting terrorism. If OTOH you see them as desperate patriots trying
to save their homeland from European invaders bent on genocide then
Saddam was not supporting terrorism, we are.

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

"Vito" wrote in message ...
Donal wrote:

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Wrong. You're forgetting that over 800,000 Jews were driven out of Arab lands in the late
40's, early 50's. In fact, the number of Jews forcibly evicted (and generally not allowed
to take any significant property or money) from Arab lands exceeded the number of
Palestinian refugees, almost all of which left voluntarily.

Iran and Iraq, for instance, had major Jewish communities, going back 2500 years. At one
time Baghdad was 20% Jewish. Now, only a handful of Jews live in either country.
Although some of the Jews remained until the 70's,in that period essentially all were
evicted and all property confiscated.

The actual numbers are hard to sort out, because Russia is included as "Europe." Even so,
roughly half if the immigration in the 5 years after independence was from Africa & Asia.
And a large portion of the European immigrants were from Romania, and other Eastern
countries, not from France and Germany.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

Nope. And I am not a terrorist sympathizer, either

Capetanios Oz wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:12:33 GMT, Grouch
wrote:


Israel would have to be considered bad, or wrong in some way, for the
way they are dealing with their own, long standing terrorists. Most of
the non-terrorist supporting world have no qualm with the way Israel is
handling terrorists inside their boarder, and I, for one, am glad they
are doing their part to keep the terrorists on the run so they cannot
regroup and cause another 9/11 elsewhere.


So now it's Israeli terrorists responsible for 911?
Hope you're not a Bush advisor.

In a way, yes. Although, I'm not sure they are considered citizens, but
the terrorists in Israel are supported by the same terrorist leaders who
supported the terorists who brought down the WTC in Booby's backyard.

I think I am more of a do'er than what Bush is seeking in his team.


Your attempt at an insult is laughable to the civilized world.

(but now we know a little more about what makes you tick)


You Jewish?


Nope, just not a terrorist sympathizer.



Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Has anyone else noticed . . .
 

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
"Vito" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Wrong. You're forgetting that over 800,000 Jews were driven out of Arab
lands in the late
40's, early 50's. In fact, the number of Jews forcibly evicted (and
generally not allowed
to take any significant property or money) from Arab lands exceeded the
number of
Palestinian refugees, almost all of which left voluntarily.


Some were driven out of Spain several centuries ago ( in the 1200's, IIRC).
They still speak an antiquated form of Spanish.



Regards


Donal
--