Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

Again, you're talking apples and oranges. For UC, there are
familial links. For IBS, there may be links, but it's not clearly
defined. For example, most professional and highly skilled
amateur athletes have very low instance of IBS. This is not
the case with UC, since there is a fairly strong genetic link.
My friend who has UC uncle died at 32. Those days it wasn't
complete understood what happened to him, but my friend
almost died with the same symptoms.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
You're talking about anecdotal
evidence vs. actual reliable data.


Because of the highly variable symptoms for UC and IBS, just about every
study
made has been based on anecdotal data, inlcuding the familial link
statistics
cited recently at 15-20%, below the keying factor. As for cancer rates,
IBS
patients have a higher rate and UC patients are told to get scoped twice
as
often for just this reason. A person with UC needs to be scoped at a
younger
age as well. Some doctors suggest 35 as a starting point.
Here's a link.
http://ibscrohns.about.com/library/b...itiscancer.htm

And this from the CFSN site:

Irritable bowel syndrome is an epidemic in the United States. More than 5%
of
the population is afflicted by "idiopathic" (cause unknown) bowel
discomfort,
urgency, and diarrhea type symptoms. IBS can progress to colitis, but is
different in that colonoscopy finds no obvious pathological changes in the
bowel.

RB

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

Well, they say if you really want to make it in the corporate
world, you have to sh*t on everyone else.

"SkitchNYC" wrote in message
...
It's one of the leading causes of workplace absense.


Figures.

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

I'm also aware of the drug
you allude to. The study was conducted with mostly women,
and as yet is not approved for men by the FDA.

I'm speaking of recently approved Colazal. It's available for anyone. About 10
bucks a day for the 9 pills. Far superior to the previous generics with
virtually no side effects.

RB

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

That's for UC not IBS.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm also aware of the drug
you allude to. The study was conducted with mostly women,
and as yet is not approved for men by the FDA.

I'm speaking of recently approved Colazal. It's available for anyone.
About 10
bucks a day for the 9 pills. Far superior to the previous generics with
virtually no side effects.

RB

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

Here's a link for the IBS drug I was talking about in case
anyone is interested...

http://www.zelnorm.com/index.jsp

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
You're talking about anecdotal
evidence vs. actual reliable data.


Because of the highly variable symptoms for UC and IBS, just about every
study
made has been based on anecdotal data, inlcuding the familial link
statistics
cited recently at 15-20%, below the keying factor. As for cancer rates,
IBS
patients have a higher rate and UC patients are told to get scoped twice
as
often for just this reason. A person with UC needs to be scoped at a
younger
age as well. Some doctors suggest 35 as a starting point.
Here's a link.
http://ibscrohns.about.com/library/b...itiscancer.htm

And this from the CFSN site:

Irritable bowel syndrome is an epidemic in the United States. More than 5%
of
the population is afflicted by "idiopathic" (cause unknown) bowel
discomfort,
urgency, and diarrhea type symptoms. IBS can progress to colitis, but is
different in that colonoscopy finds no obvious pathological changes in the
bowel.

RB

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

Bwaaahahahahahahahaa!
Hope you'r having fun.


Doesn't seem like it.

RB

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

You really are a pit bull when you get into something. I have never seen you
admit you were wrong, and I don't expect to see it now. But nonetheless:

Cause there are a million better ways to get gains or income out and cause
you're gonna turn capital gains into personal income that way - not too
smart.

Jesus, maybe you should talk to someone who actually knows about
company accounting in Oz.

This is a non-answer. Why don't you explain the benefit from your ridiculous
structure. I have explained the problems. If you don't even know why you have
it that way, then you have been taken for a ride.

The fact that you don't even know who AAR is or would say that "they don't
know
**** about Oz" tells all. They are the biggest Oz law firm and the leading
tax
advisor there and the firm consisting of some of my best friends (see, all
Ozzies are not assholes).
Bwaaahahahhahahahahahahahhaaaa!
The biggest Oz law firm?
Bwaaahahhahahahahahhahahaaaaa!
Never heard of them.
You one of those Yanks who says
"My mate lives in Australia, you probably know him"

It is easily verifiable. The fact that you have never heard of them says more
about your knowledge than mine. You just keep diggin deeper. Its like someone
claiming to have the state of the art boat, but having never heard of, say,
Morris or Hinckley.

My accountants have set up my affairs to my advantage, I'm NOT an
accountant, I believe what they tell me.

Well, that's probably the crux of the problem. Ask your "niece" to think if
the corporate form is the wisest way to hold investment securities. Its not
and you claiming you do is either a lie or the result of horribly poor advice.

G'day Alfie.

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

If it all falls down I am not personally liable providing I have not
breached my duties as a director. ie trading when insolvent.
Good eh?

Without knowing the specifics, Skitchy is ****ing into the wind suggesting
any
part of your situation is not "proper."

Proper has nothing to do with it, Bob. His statement above is correct,
except
he fails to note that he would also be personable liable if the corporate
shell
is a mere instrumentality of his, which it appears to be. This ain't ****
into
the wind, rather **** on a stupid ownership structure.

OK Kitchy, maybe you could show us your accountancy degree.
Oh, BTW my niece is an associate and very soon will be a partner
"in one of the biggest accounting firms in Oz"
Not AAR I'm afraid.......

As I've said AAR is not an accounting firm and you not being aware of them
indicates you are a small fry. No problem with that, but nothing wrong with
getting good advice. You should have your niece look over what you are doing.
Maybe then you'll see the light. You probably have a one or two man shop
handling your work now, which often results in less than efficient structures.
But to each his own - pay double taxes if you want I dont' care.

G'day and good luck.

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

Hey Kitchy, I'm no accountant.
Experts are there to be used, I use them...

Don't rely on them without knowing why they are requesting you do something.
Rule no. 1.

Bobsprit has 2 Boats!
 

As I've said AAR is not an accounting firm and you not being aware of them
indicates you are a small fry. No problem with that, but nothing wrong with
getting good advice. You should have your niece look over what you are
doing.

Well actually she works for the firm I use but she has a policy of not
working directly with family.
One of the senior partnrs is my main contact.

Seing as you are so well versed in Oz accounting, you may have heard
of them..HLB Mann Judd?
I could understand if you haven't.

Mid-tier Oz accounting firm. Big deal.

Maybe then you'll see the light. You probably have a one or two man shop
handling your work now, which often results in less than efficient
structures.
But to each his own - pay double taxes if you want I dont' care.

Ahh dear still working on incorrect assumptions.
Double taxes...Bwaaahahhaahahhahhahaaaaaaa!

OK. Then back to square one. Explain, as I have asked numerous times, why you
have organized as you have. You are quite eager to avoid answering this very
simple question. Either you don't know or you haven't really done what you've
said. Tough for you to choose, I know, because it is not clear which is least
embarassing for you.