![]() |
Bobsprit has no boat!
I'm not referring to documentation you imbicile! ADDRESS -- ADDRESS --
ADDRESS -- ADDRESS !!!!!! |
Bobsprit has no boat!
Negative!
Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts. S.Simon "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth of hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be correct for Alien. CM "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | | | What an IDIOT! | | The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do | with the depth measurement. | | The depth measurement is from the overhead to | the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation | from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel. | | The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ! | | S.Simon | | | wrote in message ... | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris" | wrote: | | We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things. But it would appear | that neither do you. | | For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented roughly 20 years ago. | Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother changing the measurement, so | this is probably the original measurement that the factory supplied. | | Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of the deck or sometimes | the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the keel. | | Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel stub, the | entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement purposes. | | BB | | |
Bobsprit has no boat!
Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal
act. False statements on documentation paperwork would not be tolerated by those interested in the legitimacy of the document. S.Simon "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... You're an idiot. When a change of ownership occurs the papers can and should be revised or amended to correct errors like a five foot depth. Booby's boat has at least a six-foot depth as depth is measured from the overhead to the top of the keel. Nope, Jeff is right. We spoke to the CG and they reccomended that we keep the measurement which is as jeff described. RB |
Bobsprit has no boat!
Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal
act. False statements on documentation paperwork would not be tolerated by those interested in the legitimacy of the document. You are simply still not aware that the figure is correct for a C&C 32. It's pretty sad how stupid you are! RB |
Bobsprit has no boat!
Draft of a vessel is a viable measurement. Gross tonnage would be as well.
Volume depends on the design of the vessel since you cannot derive volume unless you have depth, length and width at stations throughout the length. Since this differs greatly between different designs the carrying volume would be a separate measurement not derived from one maximum "depth", maximum width or maximum length. Your supposition lacks merit upon close examination. I'd bet vessel depth reflects the draft. It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with the volume of a hold or carrying capacity. CM "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | Negative! | | Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting | is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of | freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is | one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel | and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was | never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts. | | S.Simon | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... | Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth of | hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be correct | for Alien. | | CM | | "Simple Simon" wrote in message | ... | | | | | | What an IDIOT! | | | | The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do | | with the depth measurement. | | | | The depth measurement is from the overhead to | | the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation | | from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel. | | | | The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ! | | | | S.Simon | | | | | | wrote in message | ... | | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris" | | wrote: | | | | We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things. But | it would appear | | that neither do you. | | | | For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented roughly | 20 years ago. | | Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother changing | the measurement, so | | this is probably the original measurement that the factory supplied. | | | | Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of the | deck or sometimes | | the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the keel. | | | | Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel stub, | the | | entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement | purposes. | | | | BB | | | | | | | | |
Bobsprit has no boat!
You're trying to tell me that you have less than
five feet of head room in the accommodation? Bwahahahhahahahahhahahah! S.Simon "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal act. False statements on documentation paperwork would not be tolerated by those interested in the legitimacy of the document. You are simply still not aware that the figure is correct for a C&C 32. It's pretty sad how stupid you are! RB |
Bobsprit has no boat!
You're wrong. Depth by definition is maximum depth. In the same way LWL is the maximum length at the water line. In the same LOA is the maximum length from stem to stern. Look it up. S.Simon "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... Draft of a vessel is a viable measurement. Gross tonnage would be as well. Volume depends on the design of the vessel since you cannot derive volume unless you have depth, length and width at stations throughout the length. Since this differs greatly between different designs the carrying volume would be a separate measurement not derived from one maximum "depth", maximum width or maximum length. Your supposition lacks merit upon close examination. I'd bet vessel depth reflects the draft. It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with the volume of a hold or carrying capacity. CM "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | Negative! | | Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting | is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of | freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is | one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel | and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was | never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts. | | S.Simon | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... | Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth of | hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be correct | for Alien. | | CM | | "Simple Simon" wrote in message | ... | | | | | | What an IDIOT! | | | | The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do | | with the depth measurement. | | | | The depth measurement is from the overhead to | | the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation | | from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel. | | | | The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ! | | | | S.Simon | | | | | | wrote in message | ... | | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris" | | wrote: | | | | We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things. But | it would appear | | that neither do you. | | | | For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented roughly | 20 years ago. | | Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother changing | the measurement, so | | this is probably the original measurement that the factory supplied. | | | | Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of the | deck or sometimes | | the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the keel. | | | | Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel stub, | the | | entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement | purposes. | | | | BB | | | | | | | | |
Bobsprit has no boat!
Bobby's full name and address have appeared here many times.
Sorry, Bill. You've been busted again. I've never listed my complete address here. You are the only lowlife to do that. Like I said before, you, Neal and Scotty are the lowest lifeforms in this NG. Interesting that all 3 are stuck in little cheap boats. RB |
Bobsprit has no boat!
|
Bobsprit has no class!
PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"JN" wrote ... I'm not referring to documentation you imbicile! ADDRESS -- ADDRESS -- ADDRESS -- ADDRESS !!!!!! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com