![]() |
Buh-Bye!
I was going to say something but those who live in glass houses . . . "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Yes - as I said in an earlier post, we motorsailed |
Buh-Bye!
This was Molly's introduction to beaches. She's loves the water, but still has mixed
feelings about swimming. After our next trip (hopefully the Vineyard in August) she'll probably be jumping off the boat. Fortunately, Molly is happy doing her business on the trampoline - we have a washdown hose to clean it up. Notice her PFD - it also serves as a handle to carry her in and out of the dink or launch. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Cute Dog! Looks clean. Must just have gotten a bath. "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Oars are not legal in any sailboat race. And remember, our stout Portuguese Water Dog will be full grown and able to tow us at about three knots. You can see Molly is up for it already: http://www.sv-loki.com/Img_1411a.jpg |
Buh-Bye!
I've seen lots of dogs with that kind of CFD (canine flotation device).
It is so cute when people lift their dogs out of the dinghy by the handle. Most dogs don't even seem embarrased about it they way they look embarrassed when hefted up by the scruff of the neck with hand under their tummies. "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... This was Molly's introduction to beaches. She's loves the water, but still has mixed feelings about swimming. After our next trip (hopefully the Vineyard in August) she'll probably be jumping off the boat. Fortunately, Molly is happy doing her business on the trampoline - we have a washdown hose to clean it up. Notice her PFD - it also serves as a handle to carry her in and out of the dink or launch. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Cute Dog! Looks clean. Must just have gotten a bath. "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Oars are not legal in any sailboat race. And remember, our stout Portuguese Water Dog will be full grown and able to tow us at about three knots. You can see Molly is up for it already: http://www.sv-loki.com/Img_1411a.jpg |
Buh-Bye!
What was that noise? Somebody fart?
"SkitchNYC" wrote in message ... From: "Simple Simon" Performance is in the figments in my head not the facts on paper. |
Buh-Bye!
Darn. I was hoping Booby would have a chance to make a fool out of
himself by claiming it was impossible. I was in the axis most of the time. "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Sounds like you found the Gulf Stream. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Real life sailing is far different than the imaginary sailing you indulge in. It is a well-known fact that small boats can make very impressive runs given the right conditions. On one trip up the East Coast to Beaufort N.C. from Florida my boat covered 210 miles over the ground in a 24 hour period. Performance is in the facts not the figures on paper. "CANDChelp" wrote in message ... Neals average speed claim, well above is theoretical hull speed seems questionable. Jeff's speed as quoted appears understated. There is no mistaking the specs on the Coronado. Under a steady hand in aggresive conditions, she remains a slow cruiser. Her ratings reflect that. Compare her specs to an older Catalina 27 TR and she's barely got a chance. Against my C&C 32...bwaahahaa! I could sail with the main down and he wouldn't have a chance. Jeff's big multi? C'mon neal. You're just being foolish. That thing may be faster on the back of a truck. RB |
Buh-Bye!
Darn. I was hoping Booby would have a chance to make a fool out of
himself by claiming it was impossible. I was pretty close. I can only do so much in one day. RB |
Buh-Bye!
Perhaps with your 765% Genoa.
The one with Orkin printed on it? -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Buh-Bye!
Alas it is not because he will be motoring
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: My boat is faster in light winds than your C&C which stands for Crud and Crudier. "CANDChelp" wrote in message ... Yours has too much drag from propellers and the extra wetted surface of two hulls. Of course Neal knows that his boat is slow, but this is still entertaining. RB |
Buh-Bye!
You fail again to not only heed your own sermons on wetted surface... but
you seem completely ignorant of the hull designs of either vessels. My Nordica could outsail your coastal tub of a toy boat even if my vessel was hove to the entire leg. CM "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | That might be true if SA/DISP was the only parameter. | | But, you seemed to have forgotten LWL, for example, | which, on the Westsail is two and a fraction feet more | than the Nordica resulting in a hull speed more then | ten percent higher. | | It just so happens the SA/DISP ratio must be higher on | the Nordica to overcome all that extra wetted surface and | drag from aperture, fixed, three-bladed prop, horribly | inefficient, transom-hung rudder, etc. Therefore, as | you can easily see any advantage the higher SA/DISP | confers is negated by the poor design. | | Since I can beat any Westsail 32, I can also beat a Nordica | 30 which has a lower hull speed than the Westsail. | | Next time when you attempt to argue a point be sure to | not neglect the entire picture while concentrating on one | point only. I hope this helps. | | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... | The Nordica's SA/disp is over 17; the Westsail is only 14.4. You might have a chance | against a WetSnail, but not the Nordica. | | | | "Simple Simon" wrote in message | ... | I can beat a Westsail 32 any day and your heavy full-keeler is | slower than the average Westsail 32 by a significant amount. | | My beating Booby's boat is saying nothing at all. Booby's boat | is probably faster than mine by a teensy margin but since he | sails only using half his sails he doesn't have a chance even | against a Seidelman or even the fine vessel depicted in this link: | | | http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...truck_boat_mh1 | 03.jpg | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | Jeff... don't be drawn into this silly exercise of having Capt. Neal claim | he can best your vessel.... he hasn't a prayer of challenging even me | successfully and I'm certain your vessel is faster than mine on all points. | | I must admit however that he could in all probability easily beat a C&C 32 | with Bob at the helm... lets allow him that. | | CM | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | ... | | Your local knowledge won't help since I could shorten sail and follow you | anywhere. Then | | I would simply sprint by you at the finish. I suppose if you call | anything over 8 knots | | "a blow" you might have a case. Its a good thing you don't sail up here | in the Fall. | |SNIP | | | | | | | | |
Buh-Bye!
In light of my most recent discovery that my LWL is 25 feet instead
of the listed 22 feet - see post elsewhere and you can even measure for yourself if you don't trust mine - and you will realize how out- classed your slow boat is. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... You fail again to not only heed your own sermons on wetted surface... but you seem completely ignorant of the hull designs of either vessels. My Nordica could outsail your coastal tub of a toy boat even if my vessel was hove to the entire leg. CM "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | That might be true if SA/DISP was the only parameter. | | But, you seemed to have forgotten LWL, for example, | which, on the Westsail is two and a fraction feet more | than the Nordica resulting in a hull speed more then | ten percent higher. | | It just so happens the SA/DISP ratio must be higher on | the Nordica to overcome all that extra wetted surface and | drag from aperture, fixed, three-bladed prop, horribly | inefficient, transom-hung rudder, etc. Therefore, as | you can easily see any advantage the higher SA/DISP | confers is negated by the poor design. | | Since I can beat any Westsail 32, I can also beat a Nordica | 30 which has a lower hull speed than the Westsail. | | Next time when you attempt to argue a point be sure to | not neglect the entire picture while concentrating on one | point only. I hope this helps. | | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... | The Nordica's SA/disp is over 17; the Westsail is only 14.4. You might have a chance | against a WetSnail, but not the Nordica. | | | | "Simple Simon" wrote in message | ... | I can beat a Westsail 32 any day and your heavy full-keeler is | slower than the average Westsail 32 by a significant amount. | | My beating Booby's boat is saying nothing at all. Booby's boat | is probably faster than mine by a teensy margin but since he | sails only using half his sails he doesn't have a chance even | against a Seidelman or even the fine vessel depicted in this link: | | | http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...truck_boat_mh1 | 03.jpg | | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | Jeff... don't be drawn into this silly exercise of having Capt. Neal claim | he can best your vessel.... he hasn't a prayer of challenging even me | successfully and I'm certain your vessel is faster than mine on all points. | | I must admit however that he could in all probability easily beat a C&C 32 | with Bob at the helm... lets allow him that. | | CM | | | | "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message | ... | | Your local knowledge won't help since I could shorten sail and follow you | anywhere. Then | | I would simply sprint by you at the finish. I suppose if you call | anything over 8 knots | | "a blow" you might have a case. Its a good thing you don't sail up here | in the Fall. | |SNIP | | | | | | | | |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com