Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. UV is bad for the skin. A lot of people think
that those tanning booths are better because you can get a controlled tan. They're wrong. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Simply absorbing UV does not harm the skin. If this were the case evolution would have provided scales or something. Too much UV can harm the skin and too much UV causes a burn. Acceptable amounts of UV cause a tan which is NOT harmful in any way. What you are seeing is a pigment and not damage. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Okay Mooron, enough of this. Tanning is a bad thing. Tan sking ALWAYS indicates some level of damage. Providing a definition of "tanning" isn't as stupid as it seems. A tan occurs when the skin absorbs ultraviolet radiation (commonly called "UV rays"). As a response, the skin produces a substance known as melanin, which darkens the skin's outer layers. While many believe that a tan makes us appear healthier, a tan is actually a sign that the skin has been damaged. It's similar to the beginning stages of a burn. And there you have it. RB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Scaredy Skitch! | ASA |