Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
On 18 Nov 2008 17:29:02 -0600, Dave wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:27:03 -0500, Marty said: Thirty bucks an hour! Less, much less. Toyota and Honda pay quite well. (shhh, don't tell Dave) Have you included in the Toyota and Honda numbers the costs of all fringes and payments to former workers not to work? Have you included those costs in the Big Three wage costs? Yeah, turns out the assembly line workers at Toyota are making $1000 an hour, 24/7 until they drop dead, regardless of whether they show up on any day other than payday. They are pressing management to start mailing them their paychecks so they don't have to break up their week by coming in at all. Sheesh! |
#42
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:23:50 -0500, Marty said: So what is your version of THE TRUTH, Not at All? What should be done about the Big Three? Throw taxpayer money at them so the UAW bosses can keep their jobs? Dave, you do realize that unions *negotiate* with companies? Both sides *agree* to a contract and sign it. If the company negotiates a contract that kills the company who's fault is that? Certainly not the taxpayers' fault, is it? Should the taxpayers expect to absorb the cost of the foolishness of the auto company management and the UAW workers who followed their short-sighted leaders? I don't think so. Agreed 100% Cheers Martin |
#43
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:44:47 -0800, "Capt. JG" said: Gimmes to unions?? These were NEGOTIATED contracts, which the unions are willing to talk about going forward. You just keep telling yourself that, Jon. So, you're claiming that there was no negotiation? I didn't realize the UAW was in charge of the board of directors of all three. Could you possibly be any more disingenuous?? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#44
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:30:39 -0500, said: I'm just fatigued from all your evasive running around the truth, So what is your version of THE TRUTH, Not at All? What should be done about the Big Three? Throw taxpayer money at them so the UAW bosses can keep their jobs? It's always the workers' fault, isn't it. Management had no responsibility to the shareholders and didn't negotiate any of the contracts. The UAW said jump, and management jumped. Except that this is your fantasy, which has been severely undermined by the recent two elections... oops. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#45
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:55:56 -0500, said: So what is your version of THE TRUTH, Not at All? What should be done about the Big Three? Throw taxpayer money at them so the UAW bosses can keep their jobs? Throwing money at them in thier present form will only prolong the agony. It won't help them one bit in climbing out of the hole they are in. I'm not at all sure that they CAN be saved. At least not all three of them. That's what Chapter 11 is for. If they can't be saved, they end up in Chapter 7, their assets are sold, and the creditors take the proceeds. And, 5+ million are out of work, out of money, no pension, no healthcare. Great. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#46
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
"Marty" wrote in message
... Dave wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:30:39 -0500, said: I'm just fatigued from all your evasive running around the truth, So what is your version of THE TRUTH, Not at All? What should be done about the Big Three? Throw taxpayer money at them so the UAW bosses can keep their jobs? Dave, you do realize that unions *negotiate* with companies? Both sides *agree* to a contract and sign it. If the company negotiates a contract that kills the company who's fault is that? Cheers Martin No. He knows. He just can't admit it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#47
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:45:39 -0800, "Capt. JG" said: Sell better cars. Good idea, Jon. They could import some of those cars from abroad, and people would buy them. Oh, wait a minute. Those cars wouldn't be built in UAW plants, so the car companies couldn't count them against their CAFE requirements. ?? You asked how they can make money. I answered. Not my fault if you don't like the answer. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#48
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
wrote in message
... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:47:30 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:54:13 -0800, "Capt. JG" said: I have a very hard time believing that any company would pay someone not to work. It certainly can't be significant, given the other huge benefit costs, which is the major contributor to the cost of their autos/trucks. You need to do some homework. Google up "jobs bank." What's the percentage? I'd be interested to know. As far as giving up part of their wages, it seems to me that if one has a choice between a job that pays a bit less vs. not having a job, it's a no-brainer. I think perhaps you should 'splain that to the UAW leadership. You need to try your own research suggestions. The additional cost is about $1600 per car. That's a lot. But, they sell crappy cars. The UAW is willing to put "all of the benefits" on the table, according to their pres. Dave is also overlooking (deliberately?) the fact that over the past 30 or more years, the UAW has often agreed to giveBACKS when things were tough. Unions in other industries have done the same. Mentioning that would be a problem for Dave. Actually, in the last few days.... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#50
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Whooopeee!!!!!
wrote in message
... On 18 Nov 2008 12:37:02 -0600, Dave wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:47:30 -0800, "Capt. JG" said: The UAW is willing to put "all of the benefits" on the table, according to their pres. I'll be you believed "I did not have sex with that woman" too. I can easily believe you didn't have sex with any woman, Dave. Dave wins. He alluded to Clinton (pick the gender) as the resolution to the argument in his favor. I didn't even get a chance to mention KAR! LOL Sigh... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |