Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle.touring
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Fereira wrote:
Brian Nystrom wrote in news:Fdmzg.1101$eG.206 @trndny08: Davej wrote: I have seen this discussed in the past with a high degree of uncertainty and confusion. Have basic hand position guidelines now been settled upon? Thanks. What has happened is that the ACA and BCU are no longer teaching or recommending high bracing. When did that happen? As of a couple of years ago a high brace for support (both from a stationary position and on the move) were required for the BCU 3 star assessment. AFAIK, it was this year. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle.touring
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I must have missed the memo from ACA,or perhaps their web site is out
of date, but several places there is mention of using both high and low braces, for example in the Level 3 and Level 4 Assessments. Only low brace appears in the Level 1 skill set, though, so Brian may be right WRT beginning paddlers. The elbow tucked down position is the one I teach, after a long lecture about dislocations. Steve John Fereira wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote in : Davej wrote: I have seen this discussed in the past with a high degree of uncertainty and confusion. Have basic hand position guidelines now been settled upon? Thanks. What has happened is that the ACA and BCU are no longer teaching or recommending high bracing. When did that happen? As of a couple of years ago a high brace for support (both from a stationary position and on the move) were required for the BCU 3 star assessment. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle.touring
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's interesting that I'm seeing people not knowing that the ACA doesn't
encourage a high braces with the elbow up (or arm extended) anymore. When I started teaching whitewater and took the class about 10 years ago they told us it then. I haven't checked their web site out lately but I wonder why they're not making it known. I do recall that my instructor trainer still called the low elbow a high brace but we were also using the backside of the blade as well. It's easy once a person is used to doing it and can be used without a problem in big water. I happened to notice (because of this thread) that I used it three times the other afternoon in class III / IV with side kicking waves and holes. Courtney wrote in message ups.com... I must have missed the memo from ACA,or perhaps their web site is out of date, but several places there is mention of using both high and low braces, for example in the Level 3 and Level 4 Assessments. Only low brace appears in the Level 1 skill set, though, so Brian may be right WRT beginning paddlers. The elbow tucked down position is the one I teach, after a long lecture about dislocations. Steve John Fereira wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote in : Davej wrote: I have seen this discussed in the past with a high degree of uncertainty and confusion. Have basic hand position guidelines now been settled upon? Thanks. What has happened is that the ACA and BCU are no longer teaching or recommending high bracing. When did that happen? As of a couple of years ago a high brace for support (both from a stationary position and on the move) were required for the BCU 3 star assessment. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle.touring
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The extended arm exposes one of the weakest joints in the body to a lot of
risk and, worse, is a weaker position for controlling the boat. Yes, it will work (until the forces on the lever exceed the abilty of the joint to bear the stresses), but will it work better than a brace done with the elbow tucked into the top of the hip and the power side of the blade on the wave? The answer to that is absolutely not. Once the wrists go above the head, the shoulder joint actually loses both strength and flexibility. You can test this while sitting in your chair. Extend your arms fully over your head and try to slide your wrists to either side (without twisting the torso). It is almost impossible to move more that a few inches in this position. Put the wrists at shoulder height and do the same motion and, voila, your range of motion has increased considerably, from a few inches to a few feet. More importantly, the muscles have considerably more mechanical advantage from this position, so not only is the shoulder protected, you actually have more available power to apply to the paddle. Note that most of the side-to-side motion available to the shoulder joint disappears when the elbows go above the shoulder. Both flexibility and power are lost as the elbows move closer to a locked position above the shoulders. The only difference between performing a high and low brace should be the following: In a low brace, the elbows are above the paddle, and in a high brace, the elbows are below the paddle. Whether the power face of the blade is on the wave or not is more a function of the logistics of placing the paddle above or below the elbows, rather than any real change in mechanical advantage. For this reason, you could perform a high brace with the back face of the paddle, but you'd have to flip the paddle over to do it. Because it is a very visual cue, many instructors use "power face of the blade on the wave" phrasing (mine did, for example) to suggest this as the difference between a high and low brace. While it is a reasonable description of what happens visually, it is technically inaccurate and misleads the student into thinking that extending the arms is one of the goals of the high brace. I think the terms "high" and "low" are unfortunate for this reason. Rick "Courtney" wrote in message . .. It's interesting that I'm seeing people not knowing that the ACA doesn't encourage a high braces with the elbow up (or arm extended) anymore. When I started teaching whitewater and took the class about 10 years ago they told us it then. I haven't checked their web site out lately but I wonder why they're not making it known. I do recall that my instructor trainer still called the low elbow a high brace but we were also using the backside of the blade as well. It's easy once a person is used to doing it and can be used without a problem in big water. I happened to notice (because of this thread) that I used it three times the other afternoon in class III / IV with side kicking waves and holes. Courtney wrote in message ups.com... I must have missed the memo from ACA,or perhaps their web site is out of date, but several places there is mention of using both high and low braces, for example in the Level 3 and Level 4 Assessments. Only low brace appears in the Level 1 skill set, though, so Brian may be right WRT beginning paddlers. The elbow tucked down position is the one I teach, after a long lecture about dislocations. Steve John Fereira wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote in : Davej wrote: I have seen this discussed in the past with a high degree of uncertainty and confusion. Have basic hand position guidelines now been settled upon? Thanks. What has happened is that the ACA and BCU are no longer teaching or recommending high bracing. When did that happen? As of a couple of years ago a high brace for support (both from a stationary position and on the move) were required for the BCU 3 star assessment. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.paddle.touring
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're talking about me ("You talking about ME?"), I never said
anything about the ACA and elbow up/arm extended braces. I quoted the ACA documents for Level 3 and 4 coastal kayak assessments that state that paddlers should be able to do both high and low braces. This is for coastal kayak, not WW (rec.boats.paddle.touring, right?). When you're broached and bracing into a 3 foot breaker, a low brace really doesn't work as well as a well-tucked high brace. And yes, extend your arm in that situation and they may be carting you off to the ER. Now I'm wondering, did the ACA ever "encourage a high braces with the elbow up (or arm extended)" or are we chasing a chimera? Steve Courtney wrote: It's interesting that I'm seeing people not knowing that the ACA doesn't encourage a high braces with the elbow up (or arm extended) anymore. When I started teaching whitewater and took the class about 10 years ago they told us it then. I haven't checked their web site out lately but I wonder why they're not making it known. I do recall that my instructor trainer still called the low elbow a high brace but we were also using the backside of the blade as well. It's easy once a person is used to doing it and can be used without a problem in big water. I happened to notice (because of this thread) that I used it three times the other afternoon in class III / IV with side kicking waves and holes. Courtney wrote in message ups.com... I must have missed the memo from ACA,or perhaps their web site is out of date, but several places there is mention of using both high and low braces, for example in the Level 3 and Level 4 Assessments. Only low brace appears in the Level 1 skill set, though, so Brian may be right WRT beginning paddlers. The elbow tucked down position is the one I teach, after a long lecture about dislocations. Steve John Fereira wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote in : Davej wrote: I have seen this discussed in the past with a high degree of uncertainty and confusion. Have basic hand position guidelines now been settled upon? Thanks. What has happened is that the ACA and BCU are no longer teaching or recommending high bracing. When did that happen? As of a couple of years ago a high brace for support (both from a stationary position and on the move) were required for the BCU 3 star assessment. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Canada's health care crisis | General | |||
Question: Judging High Tide by the Moon | ASA | |||
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER | General |