Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cyli wrote: On 20 Mar 2005 22:31:55 -0800, "Tinkerntom" wrote: (snipped) We should probably start him off with some papyrus reeds! TnT Is there, by the way, a midwestern US equivalent of papyrus reeds? It'd be fun to float down river in for an overnighter on an island. Especially if it were a day that the aluminum hatch was headed downstream, too. More fun than doing willows and a tarp, which I have contemplated a time or two. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) I have a Folbot, SOF, so I expect that willow and tarp should work just fine if done right. Reminds me of the Tom Hanks movie, when he was stranded on the island. He had plenty of smaller pieces of wood branches, with the mylar tape, and the old life raft, any good boy scout should have been able to form a serviceable boat that would have been better than his raft. Oh well he made it back to civilization, so I guess alls well that ends well. I don't know whether cat-tail reeds would float when dried. We could suggest that frtzw use them and let him find out for the rest of us whether they would work or not. Naw, that would be mean, he'd probably get wet and then be mad at the rest of us! Besides I am getting to like the guy, and nice guys are hard to come by these days. TnT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink says:
============== I don't know whether cat-tail reeds would float when dried. We could suggest that frtzw use them and let him find out for the rest of us whether they would work or not. Naw, that would be mean, he'd probably get wet and then be mad at the rest of us! Besides I am getting to like the guy, and nice guys are hard to come by these days. TnT ============== C'mon you guys! I'm in the land of the tall cedar. Why would I want to mess with reeds, branches, etc. I'll just chop me a big old cedar, hollow it out, and go for a quick paddle... with 10 or 12 buddlies. Cheers, Wilf |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: Tink says: ============== I don't know whether cat-tail reeds would float when dried. We could suggest that frtzw use them and let him find out for the rest of us whether they would work or not. Naw, that would be mean, he'd probably get wet and then be mad at the rest of us! Besides I am getting to like the guy, and nice guys are hard to come by these days. TnT ============== C'mon you guys! I'm in the land of the tall cedar. Why would I want to mess with reeds, branches, etc. I'll just chop me a big old cedar, hollow it out, and go for a quick paddle... with 10 or 12 buddlies. Cheers, Wilf I assume your buddies are not tree-huggers? Now if the tree is in the public forest, you have to also look out for public servants with thick ticket pads that they issue for cutting down trees. So if you insist, you will probably want to restrict yourself to cutting down one of your own trees on your own acreage up there. Then you only have to worry about it landing on you, your car, your house, your neighbors... Anyway you get my drift, you might want to stick with reeds! Besides, for some one that is power-tool challenged, can you say chain saw? TnT |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink:
=================== I assume your buddies are not tree-huggers?... So if you insist, you will probably want to restrict yourself to cutting down one of your own trees on your own acreage up there. ... ===== Hmmm... good point.... In my municipality, where most people live on a slope, with "potential" view property, everyone is a tree-hugger when it comes to trees above their lot, and a logger as far as trees on the downhill side are concerned. Here, you cannot cut trees (even on your own lot) without prior consultation with the city arborist and then city permission (which is damned hard to get!). We've had way too many instances in the past of trees disappearing in some kind of "cut and run" operation as people seek to create views where none existed before. Fines can run as high as $20,000 per tree (cheap in the minds of developers if it creates $250,000 worth of view). So, Tink, maybe I'll try reeds (not that any grow here). frtzw906 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21-Mar-2005, "BCITORGB" wrote:
We've had way too many instances in the past of trees disappearing in some kind of "cut and run" operation as people seek to create views where none existed before. Fines can run as high as $20,000 per tree (cheap in the minds of developers if it creates $250,000 worth of view). Creating a view might also create an erosion and hillside instability problem too. Not something very many people worry about til the lawsuits roll in. Mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Daly wrote: On 21-Mar-2005, "BCITORGB" wrote: We've had way too many instances in the past of trees disappearing in some kind of "cut and run" operation as people seek to create views where none existed before. Fines can run as high as $20,000 per tree (cheap in the minds of developers if it creates $250,000 worth of view). Creating a view might also create an erosion and hillside instability problem too. Not something very many people worry about til the lawsuits roll in. Mike My take on this Mike is that the neighbors might be willing to pay for your kayak though if you do the "cut and run" routine. That way they get the view, frtzw gets his kayak, city gets its $20,000. Everyone is happy! The only problem I see with this gets back to the chain saw and frtzw. He has labored under the previous recent project, being power tool challenged. Now I have not yet seen a picture of frtzw, so I may be wrong on this point, but judging from what I've heard! The part about short and pudge may be a factor as well. I heard one time, " Those who can run play field hockey, those who can't, coach." Now combining my wealth of information, I really have a strange picture of frtzw running through the trees carrying a chain saw after he cuts down the neighbors tree. ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike:
============= Creating a view might also create an erosion and hillside instability problem too. Not something very many people worry about til the lawsuits roll in. ============== For sure! In a suburb just east of Vancouver, most (all) trees were cut down before constructing monster homes with a view. Now, when it rains (which is very often around here), the streets running downhill become torrents of water. It's a disaster waiting to happen. Wilf |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: Tink: =================== I assume your buddies are not tree-huggers?... So if you insist, you will probably want to restrict yourself to cutting down one of your own trees on your own acreage up there. ... ===== Hmmm... good point.... In my municipality, where most people live on a slope, with "potential" view property, everyone is a tree-hugger when it comes to trees above their lot, and a logger as far as trees on the downhill side are concerned. Here, you cannot cut trees (even on your own lot) without prior consultation with the city arborist and then city permission (which is damned hard to get!). We've had way too many instances in the past of trees disappearing in some kind of "cut and run" operation as people seek to create views where none existed before. Fines can run as high as $20,000 per tree (cheap in the minds of developers if it creates $250,000 worth of view). So, Tink, maybe I'll try reeds (not that any grow here). frtzw906 $20,000 would get you started on a pretty complete kayak rig! You know pursuit car with racks, matching paint job to kayak, chaffeur, porter to carry kayak on portages, and cooler with beer, pizza still delivered in remote bay by helicopter/pizza delivery service. Now that would be fun! You got any more money to spend, I'm sure we could figure out some worthwhile and justifiable expenses. ![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: Tink: =================== I assume your buddies are not tree-huggers?... So if you insist, you will probably want to restrict yourself to cutting down one of your own trees on your own acreage up there. ... ===== Hmmm... good point.... In my municipality, where most people live on a slope, with "potential" view property, everyone is a tree-hugger when it comes to trees above their lot, and a logger as far as trees on the downhill side are concerned. Here, you cannot cut trees (even on your own lot) without prior consultation with the city arborist and then city permission (which is damned hard to get!). We've had way too many instances in the past of trees disappearing in some kind of "cut and run" operation as people seek to create views where none existed before. Fines can run as high as $20,000 per tree (cheap in the minds of developers if it creates $250,000 worth of view). So, Tink, maybe I'll try reeds (not that any grow here). frtzw906 frtzw, I know I will pay for all this, but I am having too much fun! Did you ever hear about the Canadian woodcutter. He had been laboring for his whole life cutting firewood. One day he heard about the miraculous invention called a chainsaw. Well a few days later, he finally broke down and went into town and bought himself a chainsaw. From all he was told, he figured he would triple the amount of wood that he would be able to cut, and the nice man at the chain saw store guaranteed it in writing, or money back. So he went back to work the next day, and he really worked up a storm, but it was really dissapointing. The best he could do was about the same as he had always done. But being a good Canadian, he wasn't ready to give up and get mad at the nice man in the store, so he doubled his effort. But alas, again the same frustrating results. After a week of this, he finally gave up, and on his day off went bck into town to get his money back for the chainsaw, since it was guaranteed. He explained the situation to the nice man at the store, who said no problem, but let me check out the saw first if there is any readily visable problem. It seemed sharp enough as he checked the blade, so he pulled the starter rope and it started easily and with a strong roar. The Canadian woodsman, hearing the roar, was a little surprised, and said,"What is that noise!" TnT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink jokes:
============== The Canadian woodsman, hearing the roar, was a little surprised, and said,"What is that noise!" TnT ================= Chalis tabernac! But out west, here, the woodsman in the story is from Quebec. Then you get to tell the story with thick French accent, eh? frtzw906 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |