Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
PFD Statistics and Mandatory-Wear requirment proposal
Absolutely. I'm all for insurance companies having a freer hand to
dictate coverage terms and to price coverage according to what terms the insured is willing to accept. My father and older brother work in insurance, and so did I for a while. I hate to tell you this, but insurance is ALL about statistics. And the current statistics DO NOT support mandatory use of a pfd in a sea kayak. Besides, if the insurance company did have that kind of power then what would be next? They may decide, based on the statistics, that every paddler must wear a drysuit. Now your paddling in Florida and the air temp is 110 degrees and the water is 80 degrees. To have to wear a drysuit would be ludicrous! But you get into trouble and need assistance. To bad! Your insurance is canceled because you didn't have on a drysuit at the time as dictated by the insurance company. Is that really what you want? Scott So.Cal. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NTSB, August 25, "Mandatory" PFD | General | |||
PFD Statistics and Mandatory-Wear requirment proposal | General |