Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17-Dec-2003, Richard Ferguson wrote:
One suggestion has been to join a guided group trip, but I am accustomed to small groups with cooperative joint leadership, also the cost of a guided trip seems steep. (Floatplane costs are, however, potentially a big issue on an independent trip). I have more time than money. I would consider doing the McKenzie solo, but can't say that a solo trip seems particularly smart or attractive. I can't imagine that there'd be too many commercial offerings for such a trip. Most concentrate on something more exotic than the Mackenzie. If you launch from somewhere like Wrigley, you could drive all the way in and skip the flight costs. Return to your vehicle would require a flight, though. Even if you don't drive, finding a commercial flight into, say, Norman Wells or Fort Good Hope, and leaving from Tuk would avoid chartering a float plane. I don't know what kind of service is available to those towns, though, so it might end up the same $ as a drop in the middle of nowhere. Also, the tail end, getting to Tuk, would be a hairy paddle in the Arctic Ocean. I'd do it in a sea kayak, but not a canoe. The Mackenzie is a big river and it flows fast all the time. You would be able to cover a lot of distance without paddling. The north end is interesting as I understand it - lots of shallows and stuff. The Horton, OTOH, is in the middle of nowhere. Victoria Jason paddled the Mackenzie and wrote of it in Kabloona In A Yellow Kayak. She met a couple of guys in a canoe and described the trip. One of those guys now works for Mountain Equipment Coop and lurks occasionally on paddling lists. If you find someone to go with, be forwarned - they'll be as crazy as you :-) Good luck - it's a trip I've thought of ever since seeing the Mackenzie at Fort Simpson (stopover on the way to Nahanni). Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As far as the MacKenzie, I am skeptical about going to Tuk in an open
canoe also. One alternative would be to canoe out to some arbitrary point where it looks like the ocean starts, and then paddle back to Inuvik, or arrange a pickup in a boat or even a floatplane. A few hours in Inuvik talking to people would probably answer the question about what was practical. One unusual solution to the shuttle problem involves using Yellowknife as a hub, taking a bus from Yellowknife to Providence or Hay River, and then flying back from Inuvik to Yellowknife. Easy if your canoe fits in a duffel bag. (I have an Old Town 16 footer myself). Putting a standard canoe on the airplane from Inuvik to Yellowknife is apt to cost $500 US or so, based on a phone conversation with the airline, but it can be done. Another option would be to abandon the canoe in Inuvik. (I think I paid about that much for my canoe, used). I agree that no one is probably guiding the MacKenzie, too long a trip, not exotic. One reason that the MacKenzie river sounds good is that I heard a lecture and bought a book on Sir MacKenzie, quite a story that even most Canadians don't know. But there are many other great rivers in the north. Richard -------------------------------------------------------- I can't imagine that there'd be too many commercial offerings for such a trip. Most concentrate on something more exotic than the Mackenzie. If you launch from somewhere like Wrigley, you could drive all the way in and skip the flight costs. Return to your vehicle would require a flight, though. Even if you don't drive, finding a commercial flight into, say, Norman Wells or Fort Good Hope, and leaving from Tuk would avoid chartering a float plane. I don't know what kind of service is available to those towns, though, so it might end up the same $ as a drop in the middle of nowhere. Also, the tail end, getting to Tuk, would be a hairy paddle in the Arctic Ocean. I'd do it in a sea kayak, but not a canoe. The Mackenzie is a big river and it flows fast all the time. You would be able to cover a lot of distance without paddling. The north end is interesting as I understand it - lots of shallows and stuff. The Horton, OTOH, is in the middle of nowhere. Victoria Jason paddled the Mackenzie and wrote of it in Kabloona In A Yellow Kayak. She met a couple of guys in a canoe and described the trip. One of those guys now works for Mountain Equipment Coop and lurks occasionally on paddling lists. If you find someone to go with, be forwarned - they'll be as crazy as you :-) Good luck - it's a trip I've thought of ever since seeing the Mackenzie at Fort Simpson (stopover on the way to Nahanni). Mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Ferguson wrote in :
As far as the MacKenzie, I am skeptical about going to Tuk in an open canoe also. One alternative would be to canoe out to some arbitrary point where it looks like the ocean starts, and then paddle back to Inuvik, or arrange a pickup in a boat or even a floatplane. A few hours in Inuvik talking to people would probably answer the question about what was practical. snip You might try the website for Inuvik -- www.inuvikinfo.com -- to see of they have any info that you could use. Also www.town.inuvik.nt.ca might have some info. As well, High Arctic Adventures, based in Inuvik might be able to give you come information: or www.arcticnaturetours.com or 1-866-TOUR.TUK (tollfree). One mo Western Arctic Adventures & Equipment -- , www.inuvik.net/canoenwt, (867) 777-2594 For info on Tuktoyaktuk, their email is , (867)977-2286 I have emails and/or phone numbers for a number of the towns/villages in that area if you want to try them as well. Let me know. HTH, -- Darryl |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did the Horton last year with Nahanni River Adventures www.nahanni.com. My
travelogue is at www.philsego.com Yes -- I looked into putting together my own trip and outfitting it myself. But for the few extra $$, the outfitter/guide did all the work. I wound up partnering with the trip leader, Les Parsons - although partnering with anyone on that trip would have been fine. It's definitely worth the trip! -- Phil "Richard Ferguson" wrote in message ... As far as the MacKenzie, I am skeptical about going to Tuk in an open canoe also. One alternative would be to canoe out to some arbitrary point where it looks like the ocean starts, and then paddle back to Inuvik, or arrange a pickup in a boat or even a floatplane. A few hours in Inuvik talking to people would probably answer the question about what was practical. One unusual solution to the shuttle problem involves using Yellowknife as a hub, taking a bus from Yellowknife to Providence or Hay River, and then flying back from Inuvik to Yellowknife. Easy if your canoe fits in a duffel bag. (I have an Old Town 16 footer myself). Putting a standard canoe on the airplane from Inuvik to Yellowknife is apt to cost $500 US or so, based on a phone conversation with the airline, but it can be done. Another option would be to abandon the canoe in Inuvik. (I think I paid about that much for my canoe, used). I agree that no one is probably guiding the MacKenzie, too long a trip, not exotic. One reason that the MacKenzie river sounds good is that I heard a lecture and bought a book on Sir MacKenzie, quite a story that even most Canadians don't know. But there are many other great rivers in the north. Richard -------------------------------------------------------- I can't imagine that there'd be too many commercial offerings for such a trip. Most concentrate on something more exotic than the Mackenzie. If you launch from somewhere like Wrigley, you could drive all the way in and skip the flight costs. Return to your vehicle would require a flight, though. Even if you don't drive, finding a commercial flight into, say, Norman Wells or Fort Good Hope, and leaving from Tuk would avoid chartering a float plane. I don't know what kind of service is available to those towns, though, so it might end up the same $ as a drop in the middle of nowhere. Also, the tail end, getting to Tuk, would be a hairy paddle in the Arctic Ocean. I'd do it in a sea kayak, but not a canoe. The Mackenzie is a big river and it flows fast all the time. You would be able to cover a lot of distance without paddling. The north end is interesting as I understand it - lots of shallows and stuff. The Horton, OTOH, is in the middle of nowhere. Victoria Jason paddled the Mackenzie and wrote of it in Kabloona In A Yellow Kayak. She met a couple of guys in a canoe and described the trip. One of those guys now works for Mountain Equipment Coop and lurks occasionally on paddling lists. If you find someone to go with, be forwarned - they'll be as crazy as you :-) Good luck - it's a trip I've thought of ever since seeing the Mackenzie at Fort Simpson (stopover on the way to Nahanni). Mike |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Mackenzie is a big river and it flows fast all the time. You would
be able to cover a lot of distance without paddling. The north end is interesting as I understand it - lots of shallows and stuff. It's big AND boring. A big lake with a lot of current. The Horton, OTOH, is in the middle of nowhere. Did the Horton last summer, Horton Lake to the ocean in 21 days (it's about 600 km). It's a Barrens trip, you gotta like solitude and flat land. It's more about the journey than the scenery. A sat phone is a must if you're worried about a quick rescue. Temps from 33C to 0C. Some class 3/4 whitewater in the middle for a couple of days, otherwise easy class 1 (assuming you're comfortable in moving water). We flew in from Normal Wells on a float, out to Inuvik from the mouth on a Twin Otter (wheels). Saw a few other people along the way. It's a lot easier with an outfitter; arranging those 1-way flights and renting boats gets ugly. (I'm only lurking here for a while, killing some time, after a long absence; email if you want more info). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |