Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

I wonder how they are going with the Cutty Sark. Hal


On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

Hi Hal,
I haven't heard anything about the Cutty Sark, maybe someone else
hanging out here has some info they can pass along?
Bob

On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:35:30 -0400, wrote:

I wonder how they are going with the Cutty Sark. Hal


On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:41:30 -0400, Bob_R
wrote:

Hi Hal,
I haven't heard anything about the Cutty Sark, maybe someone else
hanging out here has some info they can pass along?
Bob

On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:35:30 -0400, wrote:

I wonder how they are going with the Cutty Sark. Hal


On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul
The Cutty Sark is fully restored and open to the public at Greenwich.
A quick Google will bring you up pictures. There was a bit of
controversy over the way she is displayed, raised up from the dock
bottom with a cover at the waterline to represent the sea.

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:11:05 +0100, JimGill
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:41:30 -0400, Bob_R
wrote:

Hi Hal,
I haven't heard anything about the Cutty Sark, maybe someone else
hanging out here has some info they can pass along?
Bob

On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:35:30 -0400, wrote:

I wonder how they are going with the Cutty Sark. Hal


On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul
The Cutty Sark is fully restored and open to the public at Greenwich.
A quick Google will bring you up pictures. There was a bit of
controversy over the way she is displayed, raised up from the dock
bottom with a cover at the waterline to represent the sea.

Hi Jim,
Thanks for the info.
Bob

On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

Hi Paul,
You sent me looking. Zooming in on the original images I took, it
looks like she is drawing (draughting?) 12 feet (3.66m).

Here is a picture I grabbed from their web cam a few days before they
dropped her back into the water, showing the lower hull.
Maybe a lot of ballast?
Bob

Disclaimer: picture is not mine, it is the property of others.

On 8/17/2020 10:39 PM, Bob_R wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

Hi Paul,
You sent me looking. Zooming in on the original images I took, it
looks like she is drawing (draughting?) 12 feet (3.66m).

Here is a picture I grabbed from their web cam a few days before they
dropped her back into the water, showing the lower hull.
Maybe a lot of ballast?
Bob

Disclaimer: picture is not mine, it is the property of others.


Good picture, thanks for finding it Bob. It's a good size hull and
loaded with cargo or ballast should be able to make here pretty seaworthy.

Paul

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 21:35:41 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/17/2020 10:39 PM, Bob_R wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:48:14 -0400, Paul McGrane
wrote:

On 8/13/2020 9:46 PM, Bob_R wrote:
Mayflower II

There's a lot of rope on that boat.


She is a good looking ship. It must be pretty big under the waterline
because it looks top heavy here.A pretty good parade following her also.

Paul

Hi Paul,
You sent me looking. Zooming in on the original images I took, it
looks like she is drawing (draughting?) 12 feet (3.66m).

Here is a picture I grabbed from their web cam a few days before they
dropped her back into the water, showing the lower hull.
Maybe a lot of ballast?
Bob

Disclaimer: picture is not mine, it is the property of others.


Good picture, thanks for finding it Bob. It's a good size hull and
loaded with cargo or ballast should be able to make here pretty seaworthy.

Paul

It was a fun little exercise finding the info. I guess the design
*had* to be seaworthy, she crossed the Atantic to get here in '57. I
was in West Bridgewater at the time, not far inland from Plymouth, and
it was a big deal in the area.
Bob