Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 263
Default Bush Bailout

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:40:24 -0800, rand mair fheal wrote:

In article ,
Cliff wrote:

but the dems would have found another
way to pilfer the country.


It's bushco's program.
THEY run it.


its simpler than that

the treasury is part of the executive
they have to get permission to spend money from congress
but actually spending the money is done with the presidents authority
who decides exactly what to spend and when and who to pay
and usually congress leaves many details unspecified
which the president makes specific

so if there is disgruntlement on how money is being spent
until 20 jan 2009 its all up to shrub

the only real responsibility that can be laid on congress
is if they dont authorize enough spending


Treasury spent about 3 TRILLION not
authorized by congress IIRC. So far as best
I can tell.
--
Cliff

  #62   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 162
Default Bush Bailout

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:51:34 -0500, Cliff wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:40:24 -0800, rand mair fheal
wrote:

In article ,
Cliff wrote:

but the dems would have found another way to pilfer the country.

It's bushco's program.
THEY run it.


its simpler than that

the treasury is part of the executive they have to get permission to
spend money from congress but actually spending the money is done with
the presidents authority who decides exactly what to spend and when and
who to pay and usually congress leaves many details unspecified which the
president makes specific

so if there is disgruntlement on how money is being spent until 20 jan
2009 its all up to shrub

the only real responsibility that can be laid on congress is if they dont
authorize enough spending


Treasury spent about 3 TRILLION not
authorized by congress IIRC. So far as best I can tell.


neoconIt's Clinton's fault.../neocon

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery Good, Gays Bad, Snakes Talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

  #63   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Default Bush Bailout

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:51:34 -0500, Cliff wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:40:24 -0800, rand mair fheal
wrote:

In article ,
Cliff wrote:

but the dems would have found another way to pilfer the country.

It's bushco's program.
THEY run it.

its simpler than that

the treasury is part of the executive they have to get permission to
spend money from congress but actually spending the money is done
with the presidents authority who decides exactly what to spend and
when and who to pay and usually congress leaves many details
unspecified which the president makes specific

so if there is disgruntlement on how money is being spent until 20
jan 2009 its all up to shrub

the only real responsibility that can be laid on congress is if
they dont authorize enough spending


Treasury spent about 3 TRILLION not
authorized by congress IIRC. So far as best I can tell.


neoconIt's Clinton's fault.../neocon


Just remember you wrote that when Obama starts tripping all over his dick
(and he will) and you're looking for someone else to blame.




  #64   Report Post  
posted to alt.machines.cnc,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 162
Default Bush Bailout

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:01:01 -0500, Walter wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:51:34 -0500, Cliff wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:40:24 -0800, rand mair fheal
wrote:

In article , Cliff
wrote:

but the dems would have found another way to pilfer the country.

It's bushco's program.
THEY run it.

its simpler than that

the treasury is part of the executive they have to get permission to
spend money from congress but actually spending the money is done with
the presidents authority who decides exactly what to spend and when
and who to pay and usually congress leaves many details unspecified
which the president makes specific

so if there is disgruntlement on how money is being spent until 20 jan
2009 its all up to shrub

the only real responsibility that can be laid on congress is if they
dont authorize enough spending

Treasury spent about 3 TRILLION not
authorized by congress IIRC. So far as best I can tell.


neoconIt's Clinton's fault.../neocon


Just remember you wrote that when Obama starts tripping all over his dick
(and he will) and you're looking for someone else to blame.


When (if) Obama ****s up and violates the clear meaning of the
Constitution then I'll blast him appropriately however at this time
America and the world are on an economic downslope entirely of Bush's
making. "Bush" no longer refers just to the idiot son of Bush43 but to
those who pull his strings and constitute his cabinet too.

It's entirely too premature to attack Obama, "Bush" currently holds the
White House.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery Good, Gays Bad, Snakes Talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

  #65   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 774
Default Curly molests a pedo....and squeals like a little Bitch...!!!!!!

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:20:10 -0600, "John \"C\""
wrote:


"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:01:01 -0500, Walter wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:51:34 -0500, Cliff wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:40:24 -0800, rand mair fheal


wrote:

In article , Cliff
wrote:

but the dems would have found another way to pilfer the

country.

It's bushco's program.
THEY run it.

its simpler than that

the treasury is part of the executive they have to get permission

to
spend money from congress but actually spending the money is done

with
the presidents authority who decides exactly what to spend and

when
and who to pay and usually congress leaves many details

unspecified
which the president makes specific

so if there is disgruntlement on how money is being spent until

20 jan
2009 its all up to shrub

the only real responsibility that can be laid on congress is if

they
dont authorize enough spending

Treasury spent about 3 TRILLION not
authorized by congress IIRC. So far as best I can tell.

neoconIt's Clinton's fault.../neocon

Just remember you wrote that when Obama starts tripping all over his

dick
(and he will) and you're looking for someone else to blame.


When (if) Obama ****s up and violates the clear meaning of the
Constitution then I'll blast him appropriately however at this time
America and the world are on an economic downslope entirely of Bush's
making. "Bush" no longer refers just to the idiot son of Bush43 but

to
those who pull his strings and constitute his cabinet too.

It's entirely too premature to attack Obama, "Bush" currently holds

the
White House.
--
Regards, Curly


And you're holding Michael Jackson's tiny pecker with your tongue!

Your Pal,
HJ


Does Salty hang with you guys also?
--
John H.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAW bailout Charles Momsen ASA 3 November 13th 08 07:52 PM
Bailout? Charles Momsen ASA 3 October 6th 08 01:37 PM
Bailout bust! Charles Momsen ASA 0 September 30th 08 01:17 AM
Bailout question Charles Momsen ASA 0 September 29th 08 02:36 AM
Another 150 billion bailout! Charles Momsen ASA 0 September 25th 08 03:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017