| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Looks like..
The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock
market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one... |
Looks like..
On Nov 6, 3:58*pm, wrote:
The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one... crickets Guess it's only the slander and lies they are interested in. But the fraudlection is over, time to start blaming the republican minority some more... Pfffttt, funny how even one of the most "liberal" states [Cal] voted to overturn the controversial gay marriage law against the elitists illegal proclamations and wishes. Makes you wonder how it would have gone if ACORN was involved there.. but it's a solid blue state so they probably need a photo id there to vote and get real results... |
Looks like..
It's over. You lost big time. Get over it.
wrote in message ... The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one... |
Looks like..
"jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch |
Looks like..
Eisboch wrote:
"jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. |
Looks like..
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 8:36*am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
It's over. *You lost big time. *Get over it. wrote in message ... The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pfffttt. I could say the same thing to you.. Hey, you won, now stop the name calling and blame game and get something done... |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 9:07*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message news:78OdnTldEejy2YnUnZ2dnUVZ_h6dnZ2d@earthlink. com... It's over. *You lost big time. *Get over it. Heh. * I had to laugh. * I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. The only thing for certain is Harry, James, Salty, et al will probably continue to spin, dance, attack and do what they can to drive any oppositition away from the conversation. This is not a party of tolerance or compromise, they have proven to be a party of hate and censorship...They can't help but sit back and throw stones... So buck up and keep working, someone will have to pay for their folly. I'm still waiting for Obama to say something about health care ;) |
Looks like..
On Nov 6, 3:58*pm, wrote:
The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one... Who ****ing cares...... |
Looks like..
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:55:53 -0500, Jim wrote:
Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. With any luck we'll be hearing less of him as he scrambles around trying to get back on the public payroll in some way. Perhaps he'll be able to upgrade his transom height at our expense. |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 8:55*am, Jim wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message om... It's over. *You lost big time. *Get over it. Heh. * I had to laugh. * I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Just where DO fat smelly nasty old creepy nail chewing vulgar under- the-bridge-trolls go? |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 10:29*am, wrote:
On Nov 7, 8:55*am, Jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message om... It's over. *You lost big time. *Get over it. Heh. * I had to laugh. * I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Just where DO fat smelly nasty old creepy nail chewing vulgar under- the-bridge-trolls go? He will still be here. It's not really about the politics, it's about the attention and the little perceived victories. Besides, there will be crims to cover for and excuses to make... ;) He will stay busy, you can bet on that... |
Looks like..
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. http://tube365.net/lang-en/init_char...y%20Baby%20Cry |
Looks like..
wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 3:58 pm, wrote: The people making the money here don't like the new Pres.. Stock market down 500 and yesterday had the biggest drop after an election in history... "Damn that Ronald Regan" ;) The Russians are already poking at the new weak President, and Iran is extatic.. says a lot :( Wait till you all see how Harry and the other crims here will spin this one... crickets Guess it's only the slander and lies they are interested in. But the fraudlection is over, time to start blaming the republican minority some more... Pfffttt, funny how even one of the most "liberal" states [Cal] voted to overturn the controversial gay marriage law against the elitists illegal proclamations and wishes. Makes you wonder how it would have gone if ACORN was involved there.. but it's a solid blue state so they probably need a photo id there to vote and get real results... Actually it is a geographically red state. And most of the people support gay "marriage". Just call it something else and it would pass overwhelmingly. 85% of the people support gay "unions" and equal rights to married couples. |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 1:17*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
*And most of the people support gay "marriage". *Just call it something else and it would pass overwhelmingly. *85% of the people support gay "unions" and equal rights to married couples. And I would support that, I should have been more clear.. As an chosen child, I also support gay adoption. Guess I will have to give up my "winger" wings..;) |
Looks like..
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:42:36 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jamesgangnc" wrote in message om... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch You mean he's now over it? Damn if I could tell. Seems like the same old hate-filled, name-calling, foul-mouthed soul he's always been. Of course, none of his **** applies to you! :) -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
Looks like..
On Nov 7, 1:23*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:29:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: Just where DO fat smelly nasty old creepy nail chewing vulgar under- the-bridge-trolls go? They work as political hacks when their party is in power. *The recruiting season is going full speed ahead right now and all wanna be hacks are jockeying for position, updating the rolodex and polishing their resumes. *We'll be hearing stories about a new boat soon. And it will all be lies. Harry doesn't work, his wife does. |
Looks like..
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:36:19 -0800 (PST),
wrote: The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) Last "moderate Republican" I remember was Dick Nixon. Since then they've been as whacky as the Dems. You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Very nicely done vid about the "silent majority." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVW71TXe4QM Though it's knocking the "silent majority," I pretty much maintain my membership until voting time. Voted for Nixon twice. On election day we all get to shout. God Bless America. BTW, see if you spot the boats in the vid. Though it's meant to be a propaganda spoof, the underlying chant of "shut up and work" unwittingly gets at the heart of what ails this country. --Vic |
Looks like..
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Here's a link to a c-span site that has some old interviews with the likes of Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, Barry Goldwater, etc. It took a minute or so for the page to begin loading, but then did so quickly. There's a couple of 45 minute interviews with Dirksen. Fun to listen to that distinctive voice and personality behind it again. http://www.c-span.org/apa/cong_lead....t_events,lcng; or: http://tinyurl.com/6lz5f2 Eisboch |
Looks like..
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Here's a link to a c-span site that has some old interviews with the likes of Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, Barry Goldwater, etc. It took a minute or so for the page to begin loading, but then did so quickly. There's a couple of 45 minute interviews with Dirksen. Fun to listen to that distinctive voice and personality behind it again. http://www.c-span.org/apa/cong_lead....t_events,lcng; or: http://tinyurl.com/6lz5f2 Eisboch I lived in Illinois while Dirksen was senator. I always remember his famous line, "a billion here, a billion there and pretty soon we're talking real money". Of course back in his day a billion bought a lot more than today. |
Looks like..
|
Looks like..
HK wrote:
wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. |
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. |
Looks like..
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Don't rely too heavily on monkey ears'promises. You will be disappointed. Guaranteed |
Looks like..
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. |
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. |
Looks like..
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. Yet you rely upon those corporations to provide you with your daily needs. |
Looks like..
HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch |
Looks like..
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:49:15 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Here's a link to a c-span site that has some old interviews with the likes of Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, Barry Goldwater, etc. It took a minute or so for the page to begin loading, but then did so quickly. There's a couple of 45 minute interviews with Dirksen. Fun to listen to that distinctive voice and personality behind it again. http://www.c-span.org/apa/cong_lead....t_events,lcng; or: http://tinyurl.com/6lz5f2 Eisboch Thanks. For some reason I always get a "page can't be displayed" error. Maybe tomorrow it'll work. --Vic |
Looks like..
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
Looks like..
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. |
Looks like..
Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. |
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. |
Looks like..
"DK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. Is the entire Drone Army fixated on male buttocks? I'd hate to see y'all out on maneuvers. |
Looks like..
DK wrote:
BAR wrote: Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. North America, Central America, South America. The America's. We are all Americans. |
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
DK wrote: BAR wrote: Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. North America, Central America, South America. The America's. We are all Americans. Your gal Palin didn't know what three countries comprised North America. She was the perfect candidate for today's GOP, a conservative, simple-minded, ignorant fool. |
Looks like..
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: DK wrote: BAR wrote: Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. North America, Central America, South America. The America's. We are all Americans. Your gal Palin didn't know what three countries comprised North America. She was the perfect candidate for today's GOP, a conservative, simple-minded, ignorant fool. Neither does you buddy Donnie! He must be an ignorant fool too! |
Looks like..
"BAR" wrote in message ... Boater wrote: BAR wrote: DK wrote: BAR wrote: Don White wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:21:24 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch I'm surprised the Democrats haven't come up with a plan to give everyone in the 'middle class' a check for $25,000 to spend only on a new car from one of the three. That would solve the car makers problems and buy a bunch more votes for the next election. -- Unbelievable! You 'mericans are worse than us for throwing taxpayer money at 'corporate welfare bums'. Hey Donnie, you are an American too. He's Canadian but lives most of his life in an American's ass. North America, Central America, South America. The America's. We are all Americans. Your gal Palin didn't know what three countries comprised North America. She was the perfect candidate for today's GOP, a conservative, simple-minded, ignorant fool. Neither does you buddy Donnie! He must be an ignorant fool too! Bertie...you taking the same 'stupid pills' as Ditzy Dan? Where did I say I didn't know which countries comprised North America?? Don't confuse me with that tart from the bush. |
Looks like..
"Don White" wrote in message ... Bertie...you taking the same 'stupid pills' as Ditzy Dan? Where did I say I didn't know which countries comprised North America?? Don't confuse me with that tart from the bush. Well Don, she seems to have done better in government employment than you did. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com