Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... You snipped a lot of what I wrote because you know its the truth, and your position is unsupportable. Here is my post again in its entirety: When the last Democratic President took office there was what was considered an insurmountable deficit. Wghen he left office, eight years later, he handed over a country that had a surplus, to a Republican President. What';s the current deficit or surplus after 8 years of Republicans? Don't worry, the Democrats will fix your massive screw ups AGAIN. Just bear in muind that they cant fix yuoru 8 years of hard work in the wrong direction, overnight. We may need to maintain Democratic control for the next 30 years or so to make sure you don't go stupid on us again. Just think what a Democratic Administration might accomplish if it didn't have to expend all it's time and energy correcting Republican messes. We might be in a much better position in so many areas that they can't even get to. We'd probably still be the world leader in manufacturing, and be admired and respected around the world. Toyota would being trying to emulate Chrysler, and Michigan would be swamped with work and not enough workers to fill all the positions. I no longer participate in political discussions. If I did, I would probably suggest that most financial experts consider Clinton's "balanced budget" to be nothing more than the result of some v e rrrrr y creative accounting. The deficit actually increased. Spending per the budget *was* getting under better control, but Clinton really can't take the credit, although he still tries to this day. You can actually thank Ronald Regan and a Republican controlled Congress, as hard as that may be for some to accept. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6107 But, it doesn't matter because I don't get involved in political discussions. Eisboch Good point. If the government had to account for money like businesses, they would panic. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Canuck57" wrote in message ... Good point. If the government had to account for money like businesses, they would panic. I got a kick out of some local debates that went on here in MA during the election cycle. The "official" MA operating budget, as reported by the state accounting office was approximately $28B last year. However, that does not include a couple of other categories that do not get officially reported, yet funding is required for through taxes. The real MA budget was in excess of $40B for the same time period. One of the unreported budgets is called, (believe it or not) the "Budget for non-budgeted items". We are all nuts. We just keep paying. A referendum question to cut the state sales tax in half as a means to force state government to re-evaluate all expenditures and eliminate non-essential, pork barrel programs failed. Eisboch |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... Good point. If the government had to account for money like businesses, they would panic. I got a kick out of some local debates that went on here in MA during the election cycle. The "official" MA operating budget, as reported by the state accounting office was approximately $28B last year. However, that does not include a couple of other categories that do not get officially reported, yet funding is required for through taxes. The real MA budget was in excess of $40B for the same time period. One of the unreported budgets is called, (believe it or not) the "Budget for non-budgeted items". We are all nuts. We just keep paying. A referendum question to cut the state sales tax in half as a means to force state government to re-evaluate all expenditures and eliminate non-essential, pork barrel programs failed. Eisboch Speaking of Massachusetts, I had a pretty good time there Thursday and Friday, despite the really crappy rainy weather. Stayed at a hotel right across from the Commons, got to visit some interesting construction sites, talk to some construction workers, and even went out to the Franklin Park area, where my grandfather and I used to go to the zoo. Boston's always been one of my favorite American cities. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:02:38 -0500, Boater wrote:
Speaking of Massachusetts, I had a pretty good time there Thursday and Friday, despite the really crappy rainy weather. Stayed at a hotel right across from the Commons, got to visit some interesting construction sites, talk to some construction workers, and even went out to the Franklin Park area, where my grandfather and I used to go to the zoo. Boston's always been one of my favorite American cities. Who gives a schitt about your favorite cities? Do narcissistic liars need to crosspost? -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dems top Olympics... | General | |||
Dems self destruct | General | |||
Dems Fail to Get It UP | General |