Boater wrote:
Keith nuttle wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:00:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:56:39 GMT, JohnH wrote:

Funny how it was Bush's fault when gas prices went up, but I don't
hear a
lot of praise for him as prices go down.
If we did that we'd have to praise him for the financial crisis as
well. I don't think so.

Well, he was blamed when the demand was high. He got the demand lowered.
Seems like the silver lining, wouldn't you say?

If this financial criss was caused by President Bush why did the
market start to go down at the end of nancy pelosi 100 days when she
said she was going to change the world but did nothing. The congress
has been warned for years that they must do something about the
mortgage mess that bill clinton created when he demanded the industry
provide loans to deadbeats. polisi and the other old line democrats
blocked every attempt to review the regulations.

Now obama is spending nearly 1 BILLION DOLLARS to buy this election to
give us more of the old socialistic ideas that historically have
failed and made things worse. Has anyone wonder who is contributing
all of that money. I don't suppose it is coming from the many
terrorist groups that would love to see America destroyed.




If Obama is elected, I hope it causes you so much angst you burst a
blood vessel. You deserve it.


Does the country as a whole deserve it? Do succeeding generations
deserve the damage caused by an Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Ginsburg run
government?

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
Keith nuttle wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:00:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:56:39 GMT, JohnH wrote:

Funny how it was Bush's fault when gas prices went up, but I don't
hear a
lot of praise for him as prices go down.
If we did that we'd have to praise him for the financial crisis as
well. I don't think so.

Well, he was blamed when the demand was high. He got the demand
lowered.
Seems like the silver lining, wouldn't you say?

If this financial criss was caused by President Bush why did the
market start to go down at the end of nancy pelosi 100 days when she
said she was going to change the world but did nothing. The congress
has been warned for years that they must do something about the
mortgage mess that bill clinton created when he demanded the industry
provide loans to deadbeats. polisi and the other old line democrats
blocked every attempt to review the regulations.

Now obama is spending nearly 1 BILLION DOLLARS to buy this election
to give us more of the old socialistic ideas that historically have
failed and made things worse. Has anyone wonder who is contributing
all of that money. I don't suppose it is coming from the many
terrorist groups that would love to see America destroyed.




If Obama is elected, I hope it causes you so much angst you burst a
blood vessel. You deserve it.


Does the country as a whole deserve it? Do succeeding generations
deserve the damage caused by an Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Ginsburg run
government?



Of course not. But the whole country isn't making up nonsense about
Obama and socialism, or saying the sort of off the wall ugly stuff Palin
and McCain and some of their supporters are uttering.

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
Keith nuttle wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:00:54 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:56:39 GMT, JohnH wrote:

Funny how it was Bush's fault when gas prices went up, but I
don't hear a
lot of praise for him as prices go down.
If we did that we'd have to praise him for the financial crisis as
well. I don't think so.

Well, he was blamed when the demand was high. He got the demand
lowered.
Seems like the silver lining, wouldn't you say?

If this financial criss was caused by President Bush why did the
market start to go down at the end of nancy pelosi 100 days when she
said she was going to change the world but did nothing. The
congress has been warned for years that they must do something about
the mortgage mess that bill clinton created when he demanded the
industry provide loans to deadbeats. polisi and the other old line
democrats blocked every attempt to review the regulations.

Now obama is spending nearly 1 BILLION DOLLARS to buy this election
to give us more of the old socialistic ideas that historically have
failed and made things worse. Has anyone wonder who is contributing
all of that money. I don't suppose it is coming from the many
terrorist groups that would love to see America destroyed.




If Obama is elected, I hope it causes you so much angst you burst a
blood vessel. You deserve it.


Does the country as a whole deserve it? Do succeeding generations
deserve the damage caused by an Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Ginsburg run
government?



Of course not. But the whole country isn't making up nonsense about
Obama and socialism, or saying the sort of off the wall ugly stuff Palin
and McCain and some of their supporters are uttering.

There have been several posts in response to my question "Who gave obama
1 BILLION DOLLARS to spend on his campaign". Are all of you people who
are for obama afraid to ask the question.

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:35:00 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


There have been several posts in response to my question "Who gave obama
1 BILLION DOLLARS to spend on his campaign". Are all of you people who
are for obama afraid to ask the question.

What's to answer? The question is BS. No one gave Obama $1 billion.
This past week, Obama just surpassed the $188 million the Republicans
spent in 2004. In *total*, including Obama's, McCain's, the DNC, the
RNC, and all the 527s, spending is expected to reach $1 billion for this
Presidential race.

wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:35:00 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


There have been several posts in response to my question "Who gave obama
1 BILLION DOLLARS to spend on his campaign". Are all of you people who
are for obama afraid to ask the question.

What's to answer? The question is BS. No one gave Obama $1 billion.
This past week, Obama just surpassed the $188 million the Republicans
spent in 2004. In *total*, including Obama's, McCain's, the DNC, the
RNC, and all the 527s, spending is expected to reach $1 billion for this
Presidential race.

This past month obama collected 150 million.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10...g-m-september/

Six month at 150 million /month is about 900 million. obama has been
campaign for for at least 24 months.

Follow the money to find who owns obama, and who is controlling him. It
not the American people to whom he is going to "spread the wealth". (His
quote not mine)

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:29:37 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


Six month at 150 million /month is about 900 million. obama has been
campaign for for at least 24 months.

Follow the money to find who owns obama, and who is controlling him. It
not the American people to whom he is going to "spread the wealth". (His
quote not mine)

In an article posted today, has Obama having raised $605 million. He has
3.1 million donors with an average contribution of $86.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=20601070&sid=aw2Kje44v5Fk&refer=home

wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:29:37 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


Six month at 150 million /month is about 900 million. obama has been
campaign for for at least 24 months.

Follow the money to find who owns obama, and who is controlling him. It
not the American people to whom he is going to "spread the wealth". (His
quote not mine)

In an article posted today, has Obama having raised $605 million. He has
3.1 million donors with an average contribution of $86.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=20601070&sid=aw2Kje44v5Fk&refer=home
According to my calculator 86 X 3.1 = 266million. That leaves 350
million unaccounted for. And that is only what he has spent recently.

wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:29:37 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


Six month at 150 million /month is about 900 million. obama has been
campaign for for at least 24 months.

Follow the money to find who owns obama, and who is controlling him. It
not the American people to whom he is going to "spread the wealth". (His
quote not mine)

In an article posted today, has Obama having raised $605 million. He has
3.1 million donors with an average contribution of $86.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=20601070&sid=aw2Kje44v5Fk&refer=home

That is in and of itself very suspicious.

wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:35:00 -0400, Keith nuttle wrote:


There have been several posts in response to my question "Who gave obama
1 BILLION DOLLARS to spend on his campaign". Are all of you people who
are for obama afraid to ask the question.

What's to answer? The question is BS. No one gave Obama $1 billion.
This past week, Obama just surpassed the $188 million the Republicans
spent in 2004. In *total*, including Obama's, McCain's, the DNC, the
RNC, and all the 527s, spending is expected to reach $1 billion for this
Presidential race.

When "Good Will" gives Obama a total of $27,000 dollars, in
contributions under $200 each, and lists his address as a single
location of Goodwill Ind. then you get a bit suspicious as to who is
funding Obama's campaign.

If you want to know what is going on or why it is going on you follow
the money. If you don't want to know then you ignore where the money is
coming from.

..
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]