| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
An Open Letter to the American People
August 23, 2008 This year's presidential election is among the most significant in our nation's history. The country urgently needs a visionary leader who can ensure the future of our traditional strengths in science and technology and who can harness those strengths to address many of our greatest problems: energy, disease, climate change, security, and economic competitiveness. We are convinced that Senator Barack Obama is such a leader, and we urge you to join us in supporting him. ***During the administration of George W. Bush, vital parts of our country's scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government's scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations. As a result, our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk. We have lost time critical for the development of new ways to provide energy, treat disease, reverse climate change, strengthen our security, and improve our economy.*** We have watched Senator Obama's approach to these issues with admiration. We especially applaud his emphasis during the campaign on the power of science and technology to enhance our nation's competitiveness. In particular, we support the measures he plans to take through new initiatives in education and training, expanded research funding, an unbiased process for obtaining scientific advice, and an appropriate balance of basic and applied research to meet the nation's and the world's most urgent needs. Senator Obama understands that Presidential leadership and federal investments in science and technology are crucial elements in successful governance of the world's leading country. We hope you will join us as we work together to ensure his election in November. Signed, Alexei Abrikosov Physics 2003 Roger Guillemin Medicine 1977 Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 John L. Hall Physics 2005 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Leland H. Hartwell Medicine 2001 Philip W. Anderson Physics 1977 Dudley Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 H. Robert Horvitz Medicine 2002 Baruj Benacerraf Medicine 1980 Louis Ignarro Medicine 1998 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Eric R. Kandel Medicine 2000 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Walter Kohn Chemistry 1998 N. Bloembergen Physics 1981 Roger Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Michael S. Brown Medicine 1985 Leon M. Lederman Physics 1988 Linda B. Buck Medicine 2004 Craig C. Mello Medicine 2006 Mario R. Capecchi Medicine 2007 Marshall Nirenberg Medicine 1968 Stanley Cohen Medicine 1986 Douglas D. Osheroff Physics 1996 Leon Cooper Physics 1972 Stanley B. Prusiner Medicine 1997 James W. Cronin Physics 1980 Norman F. Ramsey Physics 1989 Robert F. Curl Chemistry 1996 Robert Richardson Physics 1996 Johann Diesenhofer Chemistry 1988 Burton Richter Physics 1976 John B. Fenn Chemistry 2002 Sherwood Rowland Chemistry 1995 Edmond H. Fischer Medicine 1992 Oliver Smithies Medicine 2007 Val Fitch Physics 1980 Richard R Schrock Chemistry 2005 Jerome I. Friedman Physics 1990 Joseph H. Taylor Jr. Physics 1993 Riccardo Giacconi Physics 2002 E. Donnall Thomas Medicine 1990 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 Charles H. Townes Physics 1964 Alfred G. Gilman Medicine 1994 Daniel C.Tsui Physics 1998 Donald A. Glaser Physics 1960 Harold Varmus Medicine 1989 Sheldon L. Glashow Physics 1979 James D. Watson Medicine 1962 Joseph Goldstein Medicine 1985 Eric Wieschaus Medicine 1995 Paul Greengard Medicine 2000 Frank Wilczek Physics 2004 David Gross Physics 2004 Robert W. Wilson Physics 1978 Robert H. Grubbs Chemistry 2005 |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
On Oct 5, 8:59 pm, Boater wrote:
An Open Letter to the American People August 23, 2008 This year's presidential election is among the most significant in our nation's history. The country urgently needs a visionary leader who can ensure the future of our traditional strengths in science and technology and who can harness those strengths to address many of our greatest problems: energy, disease, climate change, security, and economic competitiveness. We are convinced that Senator Barack Obama is such a leader, and we urge you to join us in supporting him. ***During the administration of George W. Bush, vital parts of our country's scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government's scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations. As a result, our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk. We have lost time critical for the development of new ways to provide energy, treat disease, reverse climate change, strengthen our security, and improve our economy.*** We have watched Senator Obama's approach to these issues with admiration. We especially applaud his emphasis during the campaign on the power of science and technology to enhance our nation's competitiveness. In particular, we support the measures he plans to take through new initiatives in education and training, expanded research funding, an unbiased process for obtaining scientific advice, and an appropriate balance of basic and applied research to meet the nation's and the world's most urgent needs. Senator Obama understands that Presidential leadership and federal investments in science and technology are crucial elements in successful governance of the world's leading country. We hope you will join us as we work together to ensure his election in November. Signed, Alexei Abrikosov Physics 2003 Roger Guillemin Medicine 1977 Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 John L. Hall Physics 2005 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Leland H. Hartwell Medicine 2001 Philip W. Anderson Physics 1977 Dudley Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 H. Robert Horvitz Medicine 2002 Baruj Benacerraf Medicine 1980 Louis Ignarro Medicine 1998 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Eric R. Kandel Medicine 2000 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Walter Kohn Chemistry 1998 N. Bloembergen Physics 1981 Roger Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Michael S. Brown Medicine 1985 Leon M. Lederman Physics 1988 Linda B. Buck Medicine 2004 Craig C. Mello Medicine 2006 Mario R. Capecchi Medicine 2007 Marshall Nirenberg Medicine 1968 Stanley Cohen Medicine 1986 Douglas D. Osheroff Physics 1996 Leon Cooper Physics 1972 Stanley B. Prusiner Medicine 1997 James W. Cronin Physics 1980 Norman F. Ramsey Physics 1989 Robert F. Curl Chemistry 1996 Robert Richardson Physics 1996 Johann Diesenhofer Chemistry 1988 Burton Richter Physics 1976 John B. Fenn Chemistry 2002 Sherwood Rowland Chemistry 1995 Edmond H. Fischer Medicine 1992 Oliver Smithies Medicine 2007 Val Fitch Physics 1980 Richard R Schrock Chemistry 2005 Jerome I. Friedman Physics 1990 Joseph H. Taylor Jr. Physics 1993 Riccardo Giacconi Physics 2002 E. Donnall Thomas Medicine 1990 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 Charles H. Townes Physics 1964 Alfred G. Gilman Medicine 1994 Daniel C.Tsui Physics 1998 Donald A. Glaser Physics 1960 Harold Varmus Medicine 1989 Sheldon L. Glashow Physics 1979 James D. Watson Medicine 1962 Joseph Goldstein Medicine 1985 Eric Wieschaus Medicine 1995 Paul Greengard Medicine 2000 Frank Wilczek Physics 2004 David Gross Physics 2004 Robert W. Wilson Physics 1978 Robert H. Grubbs Chemistry 2005 Most dems, being unable to think for themselves will happily do as they are told. I have known many brilliant physicists including Dirac (OK, I talked to him at a party) and although they may be brilliant at physics, I wouldnt trust many of them to be able to tie their own shoes. Unfortunately, many "brilliant" people are sorta "idiot savants" brilliant in a narrow field and incompetent at life in general. Harry is obviously awestruck at Nobel Prize winning in the same way that most Dems feel that celebs somehow have some special knowledge of politics. Quite frankly, I find this sort of thing to be the same as celebrity worship, which is all we can expect from Dems. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:56:13 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:
Why should they bother with the negativity? You provide enough of it here for half a dozen elections. You're talking to a guy who, every morning, has to deal with the foul smelling matter in the pustules in his face. Wouldn't you be negative? -- John H. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:56:13 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote: Why should they bother with the negativity? You provide enough of it here for half a dozen elections. You're talking to a guy who, every morning, has to deal with the foul smelling matter in the pustules in his face. Wouldn't you be negative? Are you saying he has to deal with *you* every morning? Now I know the cause of morning sickness. Give it up, Herring. You're no more competent at this than you were as a military ossifer. The only reason you made light colonel was because you stayed in long enough. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize | General | |||
| Supreme Court Gives Gores Nobel to Bush | General | |||
| Nobel Prize in Physics | ASA | |||
| OT : Pop Stars endorse Kerry | General | |||
| NY Times Endorse Kerry | General | |||
![Boater[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
