"Jim" wrote in message
. com...

"Tom G" wrote in message
...

"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!



You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her to
be in those previous interviews. I thought Biden, like previous men
she's debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. Of course, he was
in a tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and get
away with it.

Tom G.


I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going
up against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop
the floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.
Apparently your opinion is not the one shared by the majority according to
the polls. Attacking her would have been a mistake and he knew it. Even if
you believe it was a draw, that's a win for Obama/Biden. It was clear to me
that all she did the entire time was repeat the messages she had memorized
from her handlers. She has no knowledge of the issues. The comment about
having a good conversation with Kissinger was total bs. All she did was
meet and greet those people in nyc to try to bolster her resume. She spent
no real time in deep discussions with any of them. She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.

"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
m...
"Jim" wrote in message
. com...

"Tom G" wrote in message
...

"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!



You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her
to be in those previous interviews. I thought Biden, like previous men
she's debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. Of course, he
was in a tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and
get away with it.

Tom G.


I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going
up against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop
the floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.
Apparently your opinion is not the one shared by the majority according
to the polls. Attacking her would have been a mistake and he knew it.
Even if you believe it was a draw, that's a win for Obama/Biden. It was
clear to me that all she did the entire time was repeat the messages she
had memorized from her handlers. She has no knowledge of the issues. The
comment about having a good conversation with Kissinger was total bs. All
she did was meet and greet those people in nyc to try to bolster her
resume. She spent no real time in deep discussions with any of them. She
is about as unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.


Since you mention qualifications, name just 10 and let's see how the P and
VP candidates measure up. Call on Krause for help if you want.

On Oct 3, 8:05*am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:

..*She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And maybe thats a good deal.

Tim wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:05 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:

. She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And maybe thats a good deal.



I guess you are used to "totally unqualified" in the White House and
Exec Office Building...sort of more of Bush & Crowd.

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:05:08 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
wrote:

She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.

As unqualified as the non English speaking illegals? There are ten
million of them. She isn't remotely qualified, I am not denying that.

Casady

On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:36:03 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:05:08 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
wrote:

She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.

As unqualified as the non English speaking illegals? There are ten
million of them. She isn't remotely qualified, I am not denying that.

Casady

She's as qualified as Obama is, that's for damn sure.
--
John H.

John H. wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:36:03 GMT, (Richard
Casady) wrote:

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:05:08 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
wrote:

She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.
As unqualified as the non English speaking illegals? There are ten
million of them. She isn't remotely qualified, I am not denying that.

Casady

She's as qualified as Obama is, that's for damn sure.


Only in the mind of an idiot...a mind like yours.

On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0400, John H. wrote:


She's as qualified as Obama is, that's for damn sure.

http://electoral-vote.com/

wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0400, John H. wrote:


She's as qualified as Obama is, that's for damn sure.

http://electoral-vote.com/


After eight years of Bush, you'd think even the Repubs wouldn't want
someone dumber than he is - Sarah Palin - anywhere near the White House,
much less a heartbeat away. The woman is a cipher.