On Oct 2, 10:58*pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:54*pm, JimH wrote:

......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

The list of lies Biden told is astounding... Hopefully the MSM will
cover them..

They analyzed it this morning, six lies by Biden, TEN by Palin.

On Oct 2, 11:17*pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:14*pm, wrote:

On Oct 2, 11:02 pm, Boater wrote:

JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

Huh? *I really like Sarah P. but I thought Biden won.

Unfortunately he told at least 5 seperate lies about McCain's votes in
the Senate.. From coal burning plants in the US to education. I just
saw a fact checker run down the "short list"..

Again, six lies by Biden, vs. ten by Palin.

wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:17 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:14 pm, wrote:

On Oct 2, 11:02 pm, Boater wrote:
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.
Way to go Sarah!
You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?
Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.
Huh? I really like Sarah P. but I thought Biden won.
Unfortunately he told at least 5 seperate lies about McCain's votes in
the Senate.. From coal burning plants in the US to education. I just
saw a fact checker run down the "short list"..

Again, six lies by Biden, vs. ten by Palin.


Justwait and Loogy, the leading competitors in the Simple Simon contest.

"Tom G" wrote in message
...

"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!



You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her to
be in those previous interviews. I thought Biden, like previous men she's
debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. Of course, he was in a
tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and get away
with it.

Tom G.


I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going up
against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop the
floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.

On Oct 3, 7:21*am, wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:54*pm, JimH wrote:

......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

Oh, good God! If you are so gullible that you believe that fake folksy
**** she put out, you are a fool.


LOL!

hey loogy, it worked for Jimmy Carter

On Oct 3, 7:21*am, wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:58*pm, wrote:

On Oct 2, 10:54*pm, JimH wrote:

......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

The list of lies Biden told is astounding... Hopefully the MSM will
cover them..

They analyzed it this morning, six lies by Biden, TEN by Palin.

Which goes to prove that all politicians are liars.

That's why I take the majority of them with the proverbial "grain of
salt"

On Oct 3, 7:39*am, "Jim" wrote:
"Tom G" wrote in message

...







"Boater" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. *She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her to
be in those previous interviews. *I thought Biden, like previous men she's
debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. *Of course, he was in a
tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and get away
with it.

Tom G.

I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going up
against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop the
floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Agreed.

Even with the poll stating that they thought Biden did better in the
debate, some 84% stated that Palin did better than they expected.

For a new comer I thought she did pretty good.

On Oct 3, 8:59*am, Tim wrote:
On Oct 3, 7:39*am, "Jim" wrote:





"Tom G" wrote in message

...

"Boater" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!

You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. *She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her to
be in those previous interviews. *I thought Biden, like previous men she's
debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. *Of course, he was in a
tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and get away
with it.

Tom G.

I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going up
against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop the
floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Agreed.

*Even with the poll stating that they thought Biden did better in the
debate, some 84% stated that Palin did better than they expected.

For a new comer I thought she did pretty good.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Tim, you can't say that kind of stuff here. You will only get the
regulars calling names and dismissing you like they do with half the
country. And be sure not to ask any direct questions...

"Jim" wrote in message
. com...

"Tom G" wrote in message
...

"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.

Way to go Sarah!



You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?

Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.

I guess I misunderstood her...I took it that she meant that she wasn't
going to fall flat on her face by answering the questions in the way her
critics and the media expected...you know like on SNL or with Katie
Couric. She was going to be herself, not like her handlers forced her to
be in those previous interviews. I thought Biden, like previous men
she's debated (in Alaska) underestimated her a little. Of course, he was
in a tight spot...men just don't attack women in polite society and get
away with it.

Tom G.


I called it pretty much a draw, which is pretty damn good for a gal going
up against a 35 year veteran in congress. He should have been able to mop
the floor with her, but he didn't even come close to doing that.
Apparently your opinion is not the one shared by the majority according to
the polls. Attacking her would have been a mistake and he knew it. Even if
you believe it was a draw, that's a win for Obama/Biden. It was clear to me
that all she did the entire time was repeat the messages she had memorized
from her handlers. She has no knowledge of the issues. The comment about
having a good conversation with Kissinger was total bs. All she did was
meet and greet those people in nyc to try to bolster her resume. She spent
no real time in deep discussions with any of them. She is about as
unqualified for the vp spot as a person could be.

"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
...
"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:14 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:02 pm, Boater wrote:

JimH wrote:
......hits it out of the park with bases loaded.
Way to go Sarah!
You mean, by saying she wasn't going to answer the questions that were
being asked?
Palin didn't do herself any more damage, but I'd bet polls show the
undecided voters thought Biden won handily.
Huh? I really like Sarah P. but I thought Biden won.

Unfortunately he told at least 5 seperate lies about McCain's votes in
the Senate.. From coal burning plants in the US to education. I just
saw a fact checker run down the "short list"..


A fact checker, eh? :)

CNN fact checker is calling many more of Palin's comment's onto the
carpet. She said nothing of actual substance during the entire debate and
blantantly ignored several questions by simply repeating the same lines
that her handlers have been feeding her. She doesn't "know" much of this
stuff at all. She has simple memorized general comments about various
issues. It was obvious. The gop is just jumping for joy that she managed
to not fall flat on her face. But there was a couple of moments where you
could detect the deer in the headlights. The thought of her having to
step into the presidency is scary.


The scary thing is...she'd just be the figurehead...... faceless people
behind her wouldbe pulling her strings.
Where's Larry when you need 'em?