| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 11:23*am, wrote:
On Sep 8, 10:37*am, wrote: On Sep 7, 10:41 pm, wrote: On Sep 7, 10:12 pm, wrote: On Sep 7, 10:07 pm, hk wrote: wrote: I was at the springs at the head of he Wacissa River this afternoon cooling down on a hot Sept afternoon. *From far away you could hear it coming upriver, another airboat. *I hate the damn things. *I dont hate em for going places, I hate the noise. *So, is it the prop or engine that makes all the noise? *Could you maybe make an effective prop that would be less noisy? Get a noise ordinance passed and get it enforced. That's what we did where I lived in Florida. No airboats before or after certain hours of the day. We also made a stink about the damned things cruising over and cutting swaths through the wetlands. I think they like the noise. Same sort of guys as the ones who remove the mufflers on their motorcycles and put straight pipes on the little Japanese cars. Big noise, small dick. You may be right about them liking the noise. *Maybe this is a techno- opportunity to find a way around the noise generation. *A little searching shows that major noise is from the prop although many boats have unmuffled engines too. I wonder if putting a cowling around the prop would work, somebody must tried this. Found a DTIC report (that I do not want to pay for) saying that a cowling and redesigned multiblade prop will reduce prop noise. Another report from the nature Conservancy discusses noise and finds that muffling always helps some. *They also say that noise is worst at high prop tip speeds so it is best to go with a multiblade prop. Worst noise whn one is attempting to get underway from land or sandbar or to get unstuck. So, is this an opportunity for someone to make composite airboat props with multiple blades to replace all the old ones with two blades? I cannot jump on these airboat ppl too much for being ignorant rednecks, partly because I ma probably related to em and partly because airboats do have good uses. *The Wacissa is a place for em as the water is often so shallow and covered with hydrilla. *It would really make people like them if the noise could be significantly reduced. *They seem to have enough power to be able to reduce noise somehow. *Maybe radically re-think the whole concept. *At very least put cowlings around the blades so the noise goes up or back rather than be emitted in all directions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - WTF? Can't they put a muffler system on them, or is it the blades that make the most noise?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. I took an airboat ride once. Stopped at a bar in South Florida that was right on the swamp. Several airboats at the docks. Never been on one, so I asked the barkeep who in there might give me a ride. Big old swampbilly says "buy me a beer, I'll take ya". Off we go! I've gone fast all of my life and he still managed to scare me some! When we turned around he just hammered that thing and hit a small hammock (little islands in the swamp) going like a bat out of hell! |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 1:33*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady From what loogie suggests, the engines may not run if muffled too much. Is there ways to do it? Could these boats be made to be somewhat sane? I know that with our bikes there are trick pipes that are very loud, but several private tracks we frequent won't allow them. Guys have to change pipes and rejet to ride there, but it can be done... I don't think there is a lot of reason for a pleasure boat to be so loud, although I do not have problems with loud vehicles in sanctioned races, with proper permits and such... |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 2:14*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 10:53:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 8, 1:33*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady From what loogie suggests, the engines may not run if muffled too much. Is there ways to do it? Could these boats be made to be somewhat sane? I know that with our bikes there are trick pipes that are very loud, but several private tracks we frequent won't allow them. Guys have to change pipes and rejet to ride there, but it can be done... I don't think there is a lot of reason for a pleasure boat to be so loud, although I do not have problems with loud vehicles in sanctioned races, with proper permits and such... They require mufflers on sprint cars at many tracks. Casady- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Same with MX racing with N.E.M.A.. they have a sound check before races but the levels are high. It is some of the private tracks where they are more strict. Like I said, the NEMA races are sanctioned and within the zoning and other guidelines as agreed with the local communities.. But they do have limits.. My question is, is it possible for these airboats to run at all within tolerable noise levels, or do the engines just make that impossible? If so, maybe they need to find an alternative power source, or a more suited tool.. Just because something works, doesn't mean it's the best tool for the job. Who hasn't used a screwdriver as a prybar ![]() |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 1:33*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady Expansion chambers. They aren't really mufflers, but are designed to make some backpressure in normally aspirated engines. My uncle was an aviation machinist. Been around small IC engined aircraft a lot! |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 2:29*pm, wrote:
On Sep 8, 1:33*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady Expansion chambers. They aren't really mufflers, but are designed to make some backpressure in normally aspirated engines. My uncle was an aviation machinist. Been around small IC engined aircraft a lot! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COULD THEY MAKE THEM QUIETER IF THEY WANTED TO????????? Please answer me..... I gotta' know... sniff ![]() |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 8, 2:35*pm, wrote:
On Sep 8, 2:29*pm, wrote: On Sep 8, 1:33*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Normal IC aircraft engines aren't muffled, and the back pressure has an affect on them if you try to. Most, maybe all, of the planes I have experience with have had mufflers. Includes radial engines from the thirties, and the usual Piper, Beech, and Cessna planes in use from the forties on. Still loud, every one of them. Casady Expansion chambers. They aren't really mufflers, but are designed to make some backpressure in normally aspirated engines. My uncle was an aviation machinist. Been around small IC engined aircraft a lot! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COULD THEY MAKE THEM QUIETER IF THEY WANTED TO????????? Please answer me..... * I gotta' know... sniff * - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - There is not really any reason they could not have mufflers on the engine. It would probably take a few mph off the top end. But much of the noise is from the prop. Many simply bolt the prop to the engine output so there is not a lot you can do with prop redesign. More blades may allow you to run a smaller diameter but probably not a lot smaller. So the prop tip speeds are still going to be pretty high. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| MORE Rednecks, spring water and airboats | General | |||
| Rednecks, airboats and spring water | General | |||
| On Topic: Damned and double damned... | General | |||
| Florida: Everglades airboats face uncertain future | General | |||