wrote in message
...



Which has what to do with anything above?


It would be interesting to debate this political issues from another
standpoint.

Forget McCain.
Forget Obama

Forget all names and personalities entirely.

Debate the differences between the moderate Republican and moderate
Democratic philosophies in terms of which is best in this country to achieve
the common goals of individual prosperity, security, health and freedom.

The simplified Republican viewpoint calls for minimum Fed intervention,
encourages growth through lower taxes, and stresses individual reliance,
with social welfare for those not able to take care of themselves.

The simplified Democratic viewpoint stresses reliance on the Fed to provide
for equal benefits and opportunity for all.

Which do you prefer?

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...



Which has what to do with anything above?


It would be interesting to debate this political issues from another
standpoint.

Forget McCain.
Forget Obama

Forget all names and personalities entirely.

Debate the differences between the moderate Republican and moderate
Democratic philosophies in terms of which is best in this country to
achieve the common goals of individual prosperity, security, health and
freedom.

The simplified Republican viewpoint calls for minimum Fed intervention,
encourages growth through lower taxes, and stresses individual reliance,
with social welfare for those not able to take care of themselves.

The simplified Democratic viewpoint stresses reliance on the Fed to
provide for equal benefits and opportunity for all.

Which do you prefer?

Eisboch


Should have said, "stresses individual self-reliance"

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:30:51 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .



Which has what to do with anything above?


It would be interesting to debate this political issues from another
standpoint.

Forget McCain.
Forget Obama

Forget all names and personalities entirely.

Debate the differences between the moderate Republican and moderate
Democratic philosophies in terms of which is best in this country to achieve
the common goals of individual prosperity, security, health and freedom.

The simplified Republican viewpoint calls for minimum Fed intervention,
encourages growth through lower taxes, and stresses individual reliance,
with social welfare for those not able to take care of themselves.

The simplified Democratic viewpoint stresses reliance on the Fed to provide
for equal benefits and opportunity for all.

Which do you prefer?

Eisboch


I'd prefer you take it to rec.politics, especially if you're looking to
engage Harry and his buddies.

On Sep 5, 11:30*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...



Which has what to do with anything above?

It would be interesting to debate this political issues from another
standpoint.

Forget McCain.
Forget Obama

Forget all names and personalities entirely.

Debate the differences between the moderate Republican and moderate
Democratic philosophies in terms of which is best in this country to achieve
the common goals of individual prosperity, security, health and freedom.

The simplified Republican viewpoint calls for minimum Fed intervention,
encourages growth through lower taxes, and stresses individual reliance,
with social welfare for those not able to take care of themselves.

The simplified Democratic viewpoint stresses reliance on the Fed to provide
for equal benefits and opportunity for all.

Which do you prefer?

Eisboch

The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.

Overall I think that most of us are for smaller government and minimal
government intervention. But that's not what the republicans have
been delivering for the past decade. It has been the exact opposite.
And that's another problem that is surfacing in the republican party
these days, say one thing but do another.

Where as the democrates have mostly remained moderate. Most americans
want to see some sort of relief for the downtrodden. Many are not in
their predicament entirely because of their own mistakes.

Social issues are seldom simple. Neither are foreign issues. The
evidence of the republican arrogance is their decision making these
days is obvious.

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.

And that is exactly right. Until the Republicans end their incestuous
relationship with extreme right wingers, the entire future of the
party is at risk.

On Sep 5, 4:54*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. *That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.

And that is exactly right. *Until the Republicans end their incestuous
relationship with extreme right wingers, the entire future of the
party is at risk.

You mean the Republican members of congress who vote their concience,
or the democrats who fall into lockstep line with whatever they are
told by their leadership... Leading us to the mess we are in now..
"Change" would be for Pelosi to let here lemmings represent the
people, all of them...

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:54:01 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.

And that is exactly right. Until the Republicans end their incestuous
relationship with extreme right wingers, the entire future of the
party is at risk.

Ahem...

That would also be true of the Democrats and their incestuous
obsession with extreme left nutroots, "Truthers" and national
socialists.

Personally, I think this will end badly and will echo through American
history as a crucial test.

I'm betting we, as a country, will survive, but it won't be pretty.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:54:01 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

The moderate republican has been overshadowed by the right wing nut
job republicans. That's going to be the downfall of the republicans,
they have given in too much to the extreme right.
And that is exactly right. Until the Republicans end their incestuous
relationship with extreme right wingers, the entire future of the
party is at risk.

Ahem...

That would also be true of the Democrats and their incestuous
obsession with extreme left nutroots, "Truthers" and national
socialists.

Personally, I think this will end badly and will echo through American
history as a crucial test.

I'm betting we, as a country, will survive, but it won't be pretty.


"National socialists." snerk All three of them.