Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:31:57 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's *Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. *Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. He sure as hell needs no further encouragement. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I don't think the 'majority of everyone else here' really enjoys Harry's 'stir'. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. You are sounding very much like Eisboch was sounding until his continuous 'discussions' with Harry turned into another name-calling contest. Hell, Harry now has Eisboch sharing *my* pedestal. Surely you don't want that for yourself! |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
Tim wrote:
On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
"hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech. |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
"hk" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech. That really doesn't answer the question. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech. That really doesn't answer the question. You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too ambiguous. My toleration level for what? |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
"hk" wrote in message news D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech. That really doesn't answer the question. You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too ambiguous. My toleration level for what? ....."righties simply cannot *tolerate* political opinions that differ from theirs". What is your (lefty) ability to *tolerate* political opinions that differ from yours (theirs)? From what I read, not much. |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message news D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 6:25 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 5, 5:46 am, John H wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:14:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 10:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 9:11 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 8:57 pm, hk wrote: Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Eh, I don't know harry. I'm not really into the profiles, but it seems like Barak has really enjoyed his media coverage,a nd I don't think that Sarah has really been exposed to the press in the same fashion. Not saying that's good, nor bad either way, but Barrak has been smiling his way on the natl news for better than 3 years, and Sarah for the last 3 days ( or so). If I was in her place I don't' think I'd really want hard interviews just yet. and that may or may not be a good... or bad thing. If I were Mrs. Palin, *I* wouldn't want to do any serious news interviews with hard questions, either. She can appear on Faux, where they'll toss her softballs, and on Larry King, who is a great interviewer of personalities. She certainly has personality. Larry would be a great interview. Honestly, I wouldn't want her to be on O-really. I watch Fox but believe it or not I'm not an O-really fan. Yes, If he likes you he'll let you have the floor. if he doesn't, then he'll interrupt you with three different questions while you're trying to answer the first one... and criticize you in between. And O-really's Barrak interview just bolstered my views. Not pleasant. but middle of the way, I'd like her to sit across the table with Allen Colmes. he could be firm, but polite. Some people think that he's nothing more than hannity's bitch, but I totally disagree with that notion. I used to listen to Allen when he had his radio program, or at least when I could pick it up locally, and I really did enjoy him. I want to see her on Meet the Press, Face the Nation, et cetera, and not on softball programs. I like Larry King, and what he does what he does well. But he doesn't ask the hard questions. Ok,Wolfe doesn't do too bad either. Well, I'm sure she'll be on Press and Nation soon enough. If you don't think Larry King asks the tough questions, just watch him interview Michael Moore tonight! In the meantime, don't let yourself get 'Eisboched' by Harry. You don't want him calling you a petulant ****, or words to that effect. John, I've been called worse than that. by better people than Harry. nah, I try to get along with everybody. Tim, The problem with discussing anything with Harry is it encourages him to post more cut and paste BS, which fills up the NG with crap. Harry has stated for years it is his objective to destroy this NG by insulted the RepubliPigs, let's not allow us to get sucked into his game. Reg. Harry is going to c-n-p regardless of what any one says. Face it, he enjoys the stir just like the majority of every one else here. I like to post but I refuse to get involved with personal antagonize. Not to worry; the over the top righties simply cannot tolerate political opinions that differ from theirs. BTW, did you know that John McCain was a prisoner of war? Huh? What's *your* toleration level? It certainly doesn't bother me that the right-wing 'tards have political opinions that differ from mine. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still the United States, and there still is, to some degree, freedom of speech. That really doesn't answer the question. You need to qualify or flesh out your questions, Quacky. They're too ambiguous. My toleration level for what? ...."righties simply cannot *tolerate* political opinions that differ from theirs". What is your (lefty) ability to *tolerate* political opinions that differ from yours (theirs)? From what I read, not much. Really? I don't give a damn what the hard righties here posit as "thought." BTW, have you heard about McCain's time as a POW? What an impressive job he'll do as president, eh? |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
snip
BTW, have you heard about McCain's time as a POW? What an impressive job he'll do as president, eh? For better or worse, maybe we'll find out. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Programming Note: O'Rielly and Obama.. Tonite at 8..
hk wrote:
Tim wrote: On Sep 4, 6:32 pm, hk wrote: wrote: As it says, Fox News toinght, 8pm. Barak Obama and Bill O', sit down interview. Fair and respectful, I am sure... Have fun, be informed, watch... Apparently Ms. Palin will *not* be available for serious interviews by serious newsfolk. But I am sure she'll be on with BillOrally. Why not? Barak was just on there... Apparently because Mrs. Palin is "not ready" for interviewing by big time, serious, major market reporters. She's being "handled" by the McCain campaign. There are so many serious discrepancies in what Palin has said, and major flip-flops... :) Like Chris Matthews who gets a tingle up his leg every time he thinks about Obama? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailor RT2048 VHF programming | Electronics | |||
Help programming Sailor RT2047 | Electronics | |||
Help programming a Sailor RT2047 | Electronics | |||
A thank you note. | Cruising | |||
Note to Bob | ASA |