Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:10 am, BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:Of course not. If I were "pushing" my beliefs, I'd be actively
seeking :judicial or legislative solutions, :
And Roe v Wade is certainly nothing like that...
You know, you're as big an ass as the people you attack.
D'oh. Roe v. Wade is the law of the land.
Roe vs. Wade is a judicial interpretation. If Congress ever grew a pair
and enacted legislation Roe vs. Wade would disappear with the stroke of
a pen.

Looks like a law to me, do you have a citation that says otherwise?



It is better to say it is "the law" not "a law" Many people confuse
statutes with law. Statutes, treaties, Judicial decisions and binding
regulations are all "the law"

In the case of the particular decision, it is a constitutional
interpretation so it cannot be overturned by a statute

Vince