wrote in message
t...
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:44:32 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:


Oh, and I note you dodged the question. Let's try again. If the issue
is the mother and not the daughter, WHAT DID THE MOTHER DO THAT WARRANTS
DRAGGING SOME POOR 17 YEAR OLD GIRL OUT INTO PUBLIC SCRUTINY?

I'd point out, the mother is the one who did the dragging. One, she is
the one who released the statement. Two, if she didn't know she should
have known, that this would come out.

mom has let ambition and ego rule her life.
her daughter is preggers for the 2nd time because mom was too busy to notice
what the daughters are doing.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:43:35 -0400, hk wrote:


The proper term is embryo or fetus. In humans, the fetal stage doesn't
even begin until nearly three months into a pregnancy. Until then, it is
just an embryo.

You're the man, Harry.
--
John H

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Self-obsessed Hypocrite]

"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
...
wrote:

:On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:44:32 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
:
: Oh, and I note you dodged the question. Let's try again. If the issue
: is the mother and not the daughter, WHAT DID THE MOTHER DO THAT
WARRANTS
: DRAGGING SOME POOR 17 YEAR OLD GIRL OUT INTO PUBLIC SCRUTINY?
:
:I'd point out, the mother is the one who did the dragging. One, she is
:the one who released the statement. Two, if she didn't know she should
:have known, that this would come out.
:

Still waiting for an answer to the question that was asked...

you fool mccall.

she claims "abstinance only" works and her own daughter contradicts that.

she wants to make "abstinance only" the law.

she preaches how "family values" make for a moral family and her hubby is an
alcoholic and her daughter a slut.

maybe you don't understand what hypocracy is, its trying to force others to
act in a way you won't.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:05:27 -0400, hk wrote:


"republicans believe the right to life starts at conception and ends with
birth"
barney frank.




That's pretty much it.

You're the man, Harry.

--
John H

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Self-obsessed Hypocrite]

"Raymond O'Hara" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
news
Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
: : :Fred J. McCall wrote:
: : hk wrote:
: : :
: : :Once again, the issue is the girl's mother and Republican
hypocrisy on : : :sex education, abstinence and contraception, not
the girl.
: : :
: : : : What 'hypocrisy'? Do you even know what that word means?
: : : : Hint: Her daughter is marrying the father, not that it's
any of your
: : business.
: : : :
: :Yeah, teenybopper marriages usually are successful, too.
: :
: :The girl is not the issue, the mother is. Perhaps if mama weren't
so : :dead set against the teaching of the mechanics of sex and the
ways to : revent pregnancy, her daughter would be progressing into
adulthood in a : :more normal fashion, eh?
: :
: : Do you SERIOUSLY think that teenagers don't know about sex,
: contraception, and pregnancy by the age of 17? We certainly did
when
: I was that age, and that was a LONG time ago.
: : :
: :Remember, the *mother* is the issue. Not the daughter.
: :
: : And just what did the mother do wrong, other than disagree with
your
: politics?
: :
:snerk
:
:Gee, if the kids already know about sex, contraception and pregnancy,
:then why is mama against it being talked about by a health teacher in
:the public schools?
:

Gee, because perhaps she thinks that sort of thing is the realm of the
PARENTS to advise their children on rather than the government?

Are you always this stupid?

Oh, and I note you dodged the question. Let's try again. If the
issue is the mother and not the daughter, WHAT DID THE MOTHER DO THAT
WARRANTS DRAGGING SOME POOR 17 YEAR OLD GIRL OUT INTO PUBLIC SCRUTINY?



The problem is, I suspect, that evangelical parents do not teach their
children about sex, contraception and avoidance of disease. What they
teach is abstinence, which, along with the rhythm method, leads
to...pregnancy.

What did the mother do? Obviously, a ****-poor job of preparing her
daughter for the side effects of sexuality.

Through your life have you followed everything your parents taught you?

Teaching and acceptance by the student don't necessisarily go hand in
hand.


when jamie lynn spears was pregnant you ruight wingers acted like
civilization was falling.
now its "it happens no big deal"

if chelsea clinton had gotten knocked up the right would have gone into
hyper-drive attacking teenage promiscuity.
now its "well, gee, it can't be helped"

that's why dems favor adequate sex education.

now palin wants to make a law for others of what she can't successfully
teach at home.

My comment applies equally to both *sides*.

"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
...
hk wrote:
.
:

Yes, and nobody but children of such parents ever gets pregnant.

What a load of codswollops!

You may not know what "hypocrisy" means, but you do a great job of
demonstrating it.


the republicans have made getting into other peoples business their
business for quite a while now,
now they are privacy advocates? talk about hypocracy

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

There's your answer. You and Reggie say the same thing. Maybe some new
blood will make this newsgroup interesting again. I'm tired of reading
about golf games, travel trailers, little kids racing motorcycles,
guitars, et cetera, the usual fare in here.


Shall we make a list of the things we are tired of reading originating from
you, including the foul mouthed, personal insults that you have become so
infamous for?

You're cute. You complain about the OT posts, yet you initiate the majority
of them, saturate the place with political cut and pastes, then claim the NG
has gone down the tubes.

I am done. I have far more interesting and important things to do than to
spend my time debating a hypocritical, self centered blowhard.

It was fun for a while, but the stink is getting to be too much.

Eisboch



WAFA lost yet another friend.

Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:
:
:You could always post and then try to sustain a thread about boats, hey?
:

And you could always keep your **** over in rec.boats.


I knew that would happen eventually.

http://tinyurl.com/o42at

http://tinyurl.com/o42at