On Aug 28, 4:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:32:48 -0700 (PDT), JimH wrote:
On Aug 28, 1:43*pm, BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of
serious discussion by the next administration in open forums.

Are there any limits on what will be rationed?

Be careful rationing is a slippery slope to total control of the
population.

Bingo!

Doing a little sucking up, Jimmie? You probably ought to stick to Krause.
Most everyone else can see through you. Krause can too, but it's expedient
for him not to.

Agreeing with someone and not getting nasty is sucking up in your
mind?

Interesting.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................


Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of serious
discussion by the next administration in open forums.




Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of serious
discussion by the next administration in open forums.




Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch



Yeah...it got us through World War II at home. Was that what it
was...socialism?


--
No way, no how, no McCain!

"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of
serious discussion by the next administration in open forums.




Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch

Yeah...it got us through World War II at home. Was that what it
was...socialism?


You can't be serious.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................
Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of
serious discussion by the next administration in open forums.



Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch
Yeah...it got us through World War II at home. Was that what it
was...socialism?


You can't be serious.

Eisboch



You are the one who said rationing was a "giant step" toward socialism,
not me. Since we had rationing during World War II here at home, I was
wondering if *that* was socialism.




--
No way, no how, no McCain!

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................
Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of
serious discussion by the next administration in open forums.



Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch
Yeah...it got us through World War II at home. Was that what it
was...socialism?


You can't be serious.

Eisboch



He's just not that bright.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................


Some sort of rationing is not a bad idea. It is at least worthy of
serious discussion by the next administration in open forums.




Oh boy. Another small step for man ..... another giant leap towards
Socialism.

Eisboch

That will kill Obama's chance of getting elected if he ever says that.

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Affordable electric boats will be a reality soon for simple inshore
boating use. Gas will be available, but taxed to keep it expensive.
Gas taxes will mostly subsidize electric.
Electric taxes will begin to subsidize road infrastructure,
Road tollway taxes will subsidize the tourist industry.
Tourist taxes will subsidize....
Uh oh.

--Vic

On Aug 28, 5:30 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Affordable electric boats will be a reality soon for simple inshore
boating use. Gas will be available, but taxed to keep it expensive.
Gas taxes will mostly subsidize electric.
Electric taxes will begin to subsidize road infrastructure,
Road tollway taxes will subsidize the tourist industry.
Tourist taxes will subsidize....
Uh oh.

--Vic

"Everything should be discussed openly", so why is Obama trying to
legally silence those who ask about his relationship with Bill Ayers,
how open is that? Can we trust a party that says they want open
discussion and then uses the legal system to silence their
questioners?

On Aug 28, 6:50*pm, wrote:
On Aug 28, 5:30 pm, Vic Smith wrote:





On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hmmm, interesting idea. Perhaps a gas guzzler tax for those whose
boats fail too since boats are ussually luxury
items...........................

Affordable electric boats will be a reality soon for simple inshore
boating use. *Gas will be available, but taxed to keep it expensive.
Gas taxes will mostly subsidize electric.
Electric taxes will begin to subsidize road infrastructure,
Road tollway taxes will subsidize the tourist industry.
Tourist taxes will subsidize....
Uh oh.

--Vic

"Everything should be discussed openly", so why is Obama trying to
legally silence those who ask about his relationship with Bill Ayers,
how open is that? *Can we trust a party that says they want open
discussion and then uses the legal system to silence their
questioners?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just like the "fairness doctrine". they are not tolerant, they are not
for free speech..