Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY
enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
Tim wrote:
On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? I was surprised that Carville could be so honest when discussing anything. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:51:48 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? I was surprised that Carville could be so honest when discussing anything. Personally, I like him. He's a progressive compassionate pragmatist. He has genuine passion, is fully capable of saying "I'm wrong - now let's move on" and, to tell the truth, would make a great President. Does he annoy - yes. Can he be abrasive - yes. Does he tell you exactly what he thinks without protective coloration and stand by those words - yes. Can he compromise - yes. That's what we need more of in this society because it makes for active and informative debate. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:51:48 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? I was surprised that Carville could be so honest when discussing anything. Personally, I like him. He's a progressive compassionate pragmatist. He has genuine passion, is fully capable of saying "I'm wrong - now let's move on" and, to tell the truth, would make a great President. Does he annoy - yes. Can he be abrasive - yes. Does he tell you exactly what he thinks without protective coloration and stand by those words - yes. Can he compromise - yes. That's what we need more of in this society because it makes for active and informative debate. Carville is entertaining, no doubt about it. I think the convention is doing what it is supposed to do, which is to bring the Democrats together. There's three more nights to heat up the rhetoric and go after the Republicans. I saw a McCain "3 am" commerical this morning. Made me giggle. At 3 am, McCain is barely alive, and if you awoke him suddenly, he probably wouldn't know what country he was in. I used to like the guy, but that was before he decided "swiftboating" was the only chance he had. Now, he's turned into a typical Rovian fearmonger. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
On Aug 26, 8:11*am, hk wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:51:48 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. *I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. *If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. *Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. *I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? I was surprised that Carville could be so honest when discussing anything. Personally, I like him. *He's a progressive compassionate pragmatist. He has genuine passion, is fully capable of saying "I'm wrong - now let's move on" and, to tell the truth, would make a great President. Does he annoy - yes. *Can he be abrasive - yes. *Does he tell you exactly what he thinks without protective coloration and stand by those words - yes. *Can he compromise - yes. That's what we need more of in this society because it makes for active and informative debate. Carville is entertaining, no doubt about it. I think the convention is doing what it is supposed to do, which is to bring the Democrats together. There's three more nights to heat up the rhetoric and go after the Republicans. I saw a McCain "3 am" commerical this morning. Made me giggle. At 3 am, McCain is barely alive, and if you awoke him suddenly, he probably wouldn't know what country he was in. I used to like the guy, but that was before he decided "swiftboating" was the only chance he had. Now, he's turned into a typical Rovian fearmonger.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And since the Obamanation injected race into the conversation, he is a typical democrat... |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
On Aug 26, 8:20 am, wrote:
On Aug 26, 8:11 am, hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:51:48 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 26, 6:33 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. After watching the first night of the convention, all in all, I think James Carvelle summed it up best when he said. "If this party has a message, it's done a hell of a job of hiding it," Carvell said that? huh... what do you know....? I was surprised that Carville could be so honest when discussing anything. Personally, I like him. He's a progressive compassionate pragmatist. He has genuine passion, is fully capable of saying "I'm wrong - now let's move on" and, to tell the truth, would make a great President. Does he annoy - yes. Can he be abrasive - yes. Does he tell you exactly what he thinks without protective coloration and stand by those words - yes. Can he compromise - yes. That's what we need more of in this society because it makes for active and informative debate. Carville is entertaining, no doubt about it. I think the convention is doing what it is supposed to do, which is to bring the Democrats together. There's three more nights to heat up the rhetoric and go after the Republicans. I saw a McCain "3 am" commerical this morning. Made me giggle. At 3 am, McCain is barely alive, and if you awoke him suddenly, he probably wouldn't know what country he was in. I used to like the guy, but that was before he decided "swiftboating" was the only chance he had. Now, he's turned into a typical Rovian fearmonger.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And since the Obamanation injected race into the conversation, he is a typical democrat... Smithers: How does this relate to boats? |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"That is why I love this country,"
On Aug 26, 7:33*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: It is amazing what a difference handlers can make. *I would have REALLY enjoyed Michelle Obama's speech if I hadn't heard all of her "angry" speech's during the campaign. *If anyone should have been proud of her country it is Michelle and Barack. *Both of them are a rags to riches story that personifies the opportunities available to everyone in the US. *I could NEVER understand why she was so full of anger early in the campaign. of course, mccain's story is a rich to riches story.... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|