"hk" wrote in message
. ..

wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.


No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.




heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch

On Aug 21, 6:24 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

. ..





wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.

heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch

We can start with Ayers, one of Obimbo's buddies. How about all the
Dems who like Castro and Chavez. How about the great mouthpiece of
the DNC, the NYT and their defense of Stalin by saying they saw no
famine in the Ukraine They even wond a Pulitzer for that one. All
those 60s radicals have mostly become Dems and they all loved Mao.
Remember, "I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect Mandarin,
with Uncle Ho, Chairman Mao, fidel and Madame Binh......."
Roosevelt and Truman would have nothing to do with the Dem party of
today. Even Kennedy was more right wing than McCain.

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.




heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch





It didn't get to me.

On Aug 21, 7:52 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.

heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch

It didn't get to me.

Oh, Harry, did you think I was referring to you?

wrote:
On Aug 21, 7:52 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in message
...
Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.
No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.
If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.
How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.
What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.
heh, heh, heh.
Got to ya, huh?
Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.
Eisboch
It didn't get to me.

Oh, Harry, did you think I was referring to you?


No, I thought you were demonstrating your ignorance of history.

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:52:58 -0400, hk wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.

heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

It didn't get to me.

Oh yes it did.

Tell me - when Hillary pulls off her coup and steals the nomination,
what spin will you be using then?

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:52:58 -0400, hk wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.
No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.
heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.
It didn't get to me.

Oh yes it did.

Tell me - when Hillary pulls off her coup and steals the nomination,
what spin will you be using then?


Wow. Now you are telling me how I feel. Funny stuff.

Hillary is not going to be the Dem nominee for POTUS. She certainly was
my preferred candidate. I voted for her in the primary. I'd love to see
her as the veep choice, but I think the odds are against her.

Apparently the choice has been made but not announced. Of the supposed
male frontrunners for veep, I like Biden best.

You think there is any chance McCain will pick Warmonger Joe Lieberman?