On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:50:16 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. *:)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand.

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.



Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.

Filter yourself, turdcakes.

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 4:50*pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. *:)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand.

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.

Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Libs don't really understand art unless it has a pricetag, and a good
one.. of if one of their friends have it Anyone who can not hear
the difference between an old record album, even when it was new, and
a remastered CD with "noise" and such taken out, has not listened. I
like the sound of the old records, the new remastered stuff just don't
have the feel for me.. but that is art to me. Some folks have a lot of
knowledge, but no soul...

Now you are even more of an idiot. The fact that something is digital
and the fact that somebody remastered it in a way you don't like are
two very different things.

My first recorder was a wire recorder. That's what there was before
that evil acetate tape stuff was invented. You talking about art is
like a pig talking about truffles.

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:13*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:

Libs don't really understand art unless it has a pricetag, and a good
one.. of if one of their friends have it *

Please...stop demonstrating your ignorance and idiocy. You've long ago
convinced us.

If it weren't for "liberals," there wouldn't be much art, music or
literature. Most of the world's great artists in every medium were
forward-thinkers, and if they were championed, it was by those with
liberal underpinnings.

Ok, let me change that to elite, closed minded, narcissistic, cowardly
hide under your desk and troll, weren't allowed to listen to radio as
a kid,

My father built a rehearsal studio addition on our house and
encouraged us to use it with our friends as often as possible. In
1957, when I started taking guitar lessons, he took lessons for the
first year right alongside me, so he could help me with practice
during the week if I got stuck on something.

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:44:16 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

calling
people names, you lying pig.

Comedy GOLD!

On Aug 19, 6:38*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT),





wrote:
On Aug 19, 4:50*pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. *:)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand.

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.

Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Libs don't really understand art unless it has a pricetag, and a good
one.. of if one of their friends have it * Anyone who can not hear
the difference between an old record album, even when it was new, and
a remastered CD with "noise" and such taken out, has not listened. I
like the sound of the old records, the new remastered stuff just don't
have the feel for me.. but that is art to me. Some folks have a lot of
knowledge, but no soul...

Now you are even more of an idiot. The fact that something is digital
and the fact that somebody remastered it in a way you don't like are
two very different things.

My first recorder was a wire recorder. That's what there was before
that evil acetate tape stuff was invented. You talking about art is
like a pig talking about truffles.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pfffttt.don't be a hero.. Thankfully things are working better for me
at Gene's and you are filtered there.. but you just keep barking from
under your desk, I am sure someone will play with you..

On Aug 19, 5:45*pm, wrote:
On Aug 19, 5:09*pm, wrote:





On Aug 19, 4:50*pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. *:)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand..

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.

Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Libs don't really understand art unless it has a pricetag, and a good
one.. of if one of their friends have it * Anyone who can not hear
the difference between an old record album, even when it was new, and
a remastered CD with "noise" and such taken out, has not listened. I
like the sound of the old records, the new remastered stuff just don't
have the feel for me.. but that is art to me. Some folks have a lot of
knowledge, but no soul...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Whoa..... I'm pretty liberal, don't dump me in with the you-know-who
crowd.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, but your a liberal at heart, not because it's trendy. Salty is a
poser, always has been.... It's good to remember that if his real id
came out, he would shut up faster that joesparebedrrom when his did..
Psyco cowards are all alike... screw em'.

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:50:16 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it
and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. :)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand.

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.



Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.

Filter yourself, turdcakes.


Splendid advice!

On Aug 19, 7:04 am, hk wrote:
...is unlikely to have this toy:

http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/9836/

Only $1589.

--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do
the something that I can do. What I can do, I should do. And what I
should do, by the grace of God, I will do.

— Edward Everett Hale (1822-1909)

Wow. and it's not even ergonomic

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:47:51 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 6:38*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT),





wrote:
On Aug 19, 4:50*pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:46:27 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:44*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:35:30 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Hendrix sounds like ****, digital.

Does anyone honestly have any idea what that means? I'm sure
Stairflopper doesn't. I'm just curious if anyone else can parse it and
make some sense of it.

Maybe he's not a Hendrix fan. *:)

Our family attorney is a big time audiophile with all kinds of early
Marantz, Mac and Sherwood stuff - collects them actually - and once I
took over my prized Derek and The Dominos (autographed) album to play
on his Mac system.

The comparison to what you get off a CD is incredible to say the
least.

To say the least indeed.. if he had to ask, he can never understand.

How can anyone be expected to understand your complete gibberish? What
you said made absolutely no sense no matter where the puctuation might
be placed.

Unless you think Hendrix played and recorded on digital equipment and
you just left out a lot of verbiage.

No... even YOU couldn't be that stupid. You'd have forgotten to
breathe a long time ago and you wouldn't be here.

Salty, maybe you should just filter him. It's obvious he's irritating the
hell out of you. Filters, for the most part, work pretty well.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Libs don't really understand art unless it has a pricetag, and a good
one.. of if one of their friends have it * Anyone who can not hear
the difference between an old record album, even when it was new, and
a remastered CD with "noise" and such taken out, has not listened. I
like the sound of the old records, the new remastered stuff just don't
have the feel for me.. but that is art to me. Some folks have a lot of
knowledge, but no soul...

Now you are even more of an idiot. The fact that something is digital
and the fact that somebody remastered it in a way you don't like are
two very different things.

My first recorder was a wire recorder. That's what there was before
that evil acetate tape stuff was invented. You talking about art is
like a pig talking about truffles.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pfffttt.don't be a hero.. Thankfully things are working better for me
at Gene's and you are filtered there.. but you just keep barking from
under your desk, I am sure someone will play with you..

Things being better at Gene's doesn't do you a bit of good if you
still see me anywhere at all. You keep coming here to find me because
you just can't quit me you big stupid homo. I don't need to look for
anyone to play with, as you are always so available and supplicant.

On Aug 19, 7:48 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in messagenews:S72dnXHEG803IDfVnZ2dnUVZ_qXinZ2d@comca st.com...



Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
...is unlikely to have this toy:

http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/9836/

Only $1589.

This geek much prefers this ....

(new release of classic, 1965 twin .... 100% vacuum tube powered)

http://www.eisboch.com/65twin.jpg

Eisboch

I wondered why this was not done earlier.

Do the "experts" say this sounds the same as the 1965 version?

I don't know. Sounds the same to me, but I am no expert.
It has not been redesigned. Just re-released as a product. Same cabinet
design, same Jensen "special" speakers, same tube pre-amps, reverb drivers
and 6L6 output stage.

I have another, solid state Fender "Stage 1000" that has digital signal
processing, etc. Sounds ok, but not like the tube twin.
There isn't a chip, processor or digital circuit in it.

Eisboch

People are thinking "vintage" even if it's brand new, they want it to
look and sound old.

check out this brand New beat-to-death Strat!

http://stratoblogster.blogspot.com/2...shop-cruz.html

And to think, people pay more for this stuff than a crispy clean on of
the same year....