Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)



No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch




Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)



No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch


Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the sanitized,
civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)


No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch

Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the sanitized,
civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch





I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other
areas. Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)


No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch

Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch





I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.


There's some interesting spin.

Who makes up the establishment? Individuals?

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)

No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch
Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.
Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch




I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.


There's some interesting spin.

Who makes up the establishment? Individuals?





The military establishment is responsible for the Gulag in Cuba and the
hellhole prisons in Iraq where prisoners are tortured. I blame the
officer corps establishment for that, not the young enlistees who are
told what to do.

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:08:44 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

There's some interesting spin.

Who makes up the establishment? Individuals?

Individuals that Harry disagrees with - important distinction.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)


No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch

Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch





I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.

Well, you've missed out in life.

There are some very, very smart people out there, working for the
establishment, watching out for you.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)

No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch
Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.
Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch




I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.

Well, you've missed out in life.

There are some very, very smart people out there, working for the
establishment, watching out for you.

Eisboch