More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 8:51*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:



On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Yep.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)


No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch

Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch





I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.

Well, you've missed out in life.

There are some very, very smart people out there, working for the
establishment, watching out for you.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more
colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.
Wow... talk about a **** storm!
Actually I found Harry's post offensive.

Thank you, I agree.



Good. It was intended to be as offensive to you as you typically are to
me. Tit for tat. Or, in the vernacular...go foch yourself.


Here we go again.

It was nice while it lasted Harry.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)

No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch
Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.
Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the
sanitized, civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch




I'm sorry, Richard, but I simply do not believe anything the military
establishment claims or says in procurement or in a number of other areas.
Note to the simpleminded: I am not commenting on the veracity of
individual military personnel.

Well, you've missed out in life.

There are some very, very smart people out there, working for the
establishment, watching out for you.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 8:55*pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing



wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

So be iit.

SWS/Tom now posts here and other places under a dozen or so handles
as do Reggie, JohnH, Loogy, FLA Jim and Scotty. Even a scorecard will
not help you.

Pointing fingers to the wrong person? Eh?

Someone here stated that Dan was the culpri with the wife post. If
so.......I am disappointed. However......until Don chimes in I do not
accept the accusation.

The bottom line.............can folks her finally start to act like
the adults they are?

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 9:14*pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 8:55*pm, John H. wrote:



On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

So be iit.

SWS/Tom now *posts here and other places under a dozen or so handles
as do Reggie, JohnH, Loogy, FLA Jim and Scotty. *Even a scorecard will
not help you.

Pointing fingers to the wrong person? *Eh?

Someone here stated that Don was the culpri with the wife post. *If
so.......I am disappointed. *However......until Don chimes in I do not
accept the accusation.

The bottom line.............can folks here finally start to act like
the adults they are?

Edit

More problems for the Navy...
 

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 9:14 pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 8:55 pm, John H. wrote:



On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:
Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.
Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Tom's wife is a bull****ter?
Um...excuse me?
Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.
Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.
Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
So be iit.

SWS/Tom now posts here and other places under a dozen or so handles
as do Reggie, JohnH, Loogy, FLA Jim and Scotty. Even a scorecard will
not help you.

Pointing fingers to the wrong person? Eh?

Someone here stated that Don was the culpri with the wife post. If
so.......I am disappointed. However......until Don chimes in I do not
accept the accusation.

The bottom line.............can folks here finally start to act like
the adults they are?

Edit


In a group dominated by numbers by the Seven Little Schitts? Are you
kidding?

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:32:54 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

So who is it?

Don White

C:\Windows\System32tracert 24.222.66.79

Tracing route to blk-222-66-79.eastlink.ca [24.222.66.79]

Eastlink.ca is headquartered in Halifax, Nova Scotia

http://www.eastlink.ca/about/

QED

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q.E.D.

If true.............disappointed!

I don't think we have anyone else from Halifax.