More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 7:03*pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission. your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:
Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.
Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **
* * * * * John H
Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

I give up with the ever changing handles you, Tom, Scotty *and Reggie
have. *Try to keep a single handle so you are not accused of being
married to a bull****ter.

What is wrong with me using my official titles, bestowed upon me based
upon my diplomatic work with world leaders?

Nothing. Add Bull****ter and Snark to your certifications and you
will be complete.

More problems for the Navy...
 

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 7:03 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission. your a
Putz.
JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:
Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.
Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **
John H
Tom's wife is a bull****ter?
I give up with the ever changing handles you, Tom, Scotty and Reggie
have. Try to keep a single handle so you are not accused of being
married to a bull****ter.
What is wrong with me using my official titles, bestowed upon me based
upon my diplomatic work with world leaders?

Nothing. Add Bull****ter and Snark to your certifications and you
will be complete.


Reggie is a turd, no matter how he describes himself. He's also the
biggest coward in the history of rec.boats.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 7:27*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:



and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Why b Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.

With all the folks here using multiple handles lately..........why
bother?

BTW: Who's wife is a bull****ter?

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:27:39 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:
and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.


Read? Actually read something? Do you have any idea whose behavior you're
trying to change?
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.

Wow... talk about a **** storm!

Actually I found Harry's post offensive.

Thank you, I agree.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I subscribe to Jane's. :)



No wonder you are confused.

Eisboch


Right...it's much easier to accept the bs poured out by the U.S. DoD and
its suppliers.

Sorry Harry. The contracts issued by the DoD to it's suppliers are much
more indicative to the state of the art than what you read in the sanitized,
civilian orientated "Jane's".

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 8:01*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.

Wow... talk about a **** storm!

Actually I found Harry's post offensive.

Thank you, I agree.

NP.

More problems for the Navy...
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.
Wow... talk about a **** storm!
Actually I found Harry's post offensive.

Thank you, I agree.



Good. It was intended to be as offensive to you as you typically are to
me. Tit for tat. Or, in the vernacular...go foch yourself.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 7:27 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:



and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a
ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Why b Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.

With all the folks here using multiple handles lately..........why
bother?

BTW: Who's wife is a bull****ter?
===================================

The point is you accuse someone that doesn't deserve it.