giggle Harry get's banned ...again.

--Mike

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:53 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,
STP. " wrote:

HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,



Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail I
left for you...

The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.

Sad, really.

Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."

As always, have a really terrific day.

I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little schitts do

Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox on
my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you expect
me to see it.

Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property. But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.

I warned both of you.

Now it's done.

12 hours.

Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.

I mean it.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

On Aug 11, 9:25*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:
Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

He already is. Number 9 that is. ;-)

JimH wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:25 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:
Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.
Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?
--Mike
Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

He already is. Number 9 that is. ;-)



Mike is one of the alternate little schitts, fighting snaggletooth and
nail for Loogie's seat as the dumbest d.f. in here. It's close.

--
"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade
and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion,
regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts
to weaken or undermine that right."

One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of the
stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

Mike wrote:
Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.




Actually if Harry understood the "ETIF trail", he would understand that
that trail started with the original photographer and the way the
original photographer processed the photo. It didn't just start when he
downloaded the photo and then cropped it. Why anyone would use CS3 to
crop a photo I have no idea.

Either way, it was a **** poor "snapshot" of a pretty young lady, yet,
he held it up as an example of excellent photography.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall,
Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:

Mike wrote:
Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.




Actually if Harry understood the "ETIF trail", he would understand that
that trail started with the original photographer and the way the
original photographer processed the photo. It didn't just start when he
downloaded the photo and then cropped it. Why anyone would use CS3 to
crop a photo I have no idea.

Either way, it was a **** poor "snapshot" of a pretty young lady, yet,
he held it up as an example of excellent photography.

He held it up as an example of *his* excellent photography. If the photo
had been praised, and he'd not been 'caught', he'd surely be basking in the
glory.

Ditto with the Parker picture.

********************************************
"Actually, I am holding the camera. Guess I had it pointed the wrong way.
Well, it wasn't my camera...how was I to know?"
******************************************

Sure sounds like someone taking credit for a photograph.