| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the
new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. You might need to purchase a 70 HP kicker for a barge that big. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"BAR" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. You might need to purchase a 70 HP kicker for a barge that big. It's not a bad looking cabin though. Simple, but functional. Reminds me of a modern version of my father-in-law's 1972 Uniflite. Eisboch |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=o8fhux&s=4 |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 12:11*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... *Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Actually, I lied. The *magic* tuna trolling speed is roughly 3.14159 kts. Interesting, huh? Eisboch |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch Hmmmm. I used to troll my tuna spreads at five to 10 mph for yellowfin and blackfin tuna. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Actually, I lied. The *magic* tuna trolling speed is roughly 3.14159 kts. Interesting, huh? Eisboch For tuna pie? |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 12:05*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/parker34.... Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - WHOOOOSH......... |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 11:44*am, hk wrote:
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/parker34... What's the "cruise" sweet spot for your 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat? |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 12:50*pm, wrote:
On Aug 7, 11:44*am, hk wrote: There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/parker34... What's the "cruise" sweet spot for your 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - His feet smell, and his nose runs.. obviously he is upsidedown? |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 12:23*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... *Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcast. com... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Answer me that, and we'll talk. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 1:36*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well clear. nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know it's coming;) |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 1:45*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... *Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcas t.com... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk. Send Loogy? * :) Nope... Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side? Nope Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? *:) Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker question.. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 1:55*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... *Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comc ast.com... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk. Send Loogy? * :) Nope... Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side? Nope Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? *:) Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker question.. Oh...you want a serious answer. If you have one.. I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure everyone stood clear until the train passed. Nope.. Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law, who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop the train immediately. *:) Bull****... But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future. Trolling You are stupid, and useless... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch How you going to get through the 5 mph zones? |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 1:36 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well clear. nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know it's coming;) Get the video camera out. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 2:00*pm, wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:55*pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... *Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comc ast.com... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk. Send Loogy? * :) Nope... Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side? Nope Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? *:) Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker question.. Oh...you want a serious answer. If you have one.. I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure everyone stood clear until the train passed. Nope.. Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law, who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop the train immediately. *:) Bull****... But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future. Trolling You are stupid, and useless... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's our great humanitarian, wishing people dead. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Calif Bill wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch How you going to get through the 5 mph zones? Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or less. Good god... |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 2:05*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 1:36 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well clear. nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know it's coming;) Get the video camera out. Nope.. but since a few are playing, let's go with another hint.. Consider the train a red herring.... ;) |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
"hk" wrote in message . .. Calif Bill wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch How you going to get through the 5 mph zones? Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or less. Good god... Almost 7 mph at 1000 rpm may not allow a 5 mph speed. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Calif Bill wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch How you going to get through the 5 mph zones? Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or less. Good god... Almost 7 mph at 1000 rpm may not allow a 5 mph speed. Bull****. The engines easily slow down to 600 rpm, at least. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 2:06*pm, hk wrote:
Calif Bill wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message m... "hk" wrote in message m... There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site soon: The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. 1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg 1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg 2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg 2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg 3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg 3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg 4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg 4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg 5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg 5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg 6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg Time to plane: 5.25 seconds 0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little Yamaha F150, too. Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production boat: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...neous/parker34.... Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch How you going to get through the 5 mph zones? Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or less. Good god...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Holy ****, that's funny!!!! An engine will idle at ANY speed? 3rpm? |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcast. com... The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Answer me that, and we'll talk. I'd make sure no one was in that car before doing anything else. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
Don White wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. The following performance data was provided by Yamaha. Performance will vary depending on conditions and load. Minimum speed is too fast for tuna. Eisboch Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :) The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments (600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System. My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke engines. I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Still delusional, hey, Scotty? So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze hero like you so I won't bother. Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Answer me that, and we'll talk. I'd make sure no one was in that car before doing anything else. It's Scotty. It's going to have something to do with his inability to use Agent software, rusty guitar strings and cracked motorcycle helmets. |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 2:51*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk. 1. Note the time. 2. Get over there and if time is that short, risk the damage and push the car off the tracks. You said stalled, not stuck. Casady Nope, but at least you are the first one that wants to save the car;) Damn, you almost had it...;) |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 3:19*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:13:47 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Aug 7, 2:05?pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: wrote in message .... On Aug 7, 1:36 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote: "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing you do? Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well clear. nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know it's coming;) Get the video camera out. Nope.. but since a few are playing, let's go with another hint.. Consider the train a red herring.... ;) How fast is the train swimming? --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It's treading water up the tracks, but it will come, eventually... Again, think of the train as a red herring.. Think, KISS... ...;) Richard made some great points... |
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
|
Some 'Performance' Stats for new Parker 34-footer...
On Aug 7, 4:32*pm, wrote:
On Aug 7, 4:17*pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 7, 4:10 pm, "T. Bone Pickeral V, ESQ, MD, PhD, JD, Inc, LLC, TM" wrote: On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:00:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. LLC" wrote: Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: I know. Just trying to be a wise ass. The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling speed of about 3 kts. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories;) Actually, I lied. * The *magic* *tuna trolling speed is roughly 3.14159 kts. Interesting, huh? Do Tuna swim in circles? Only when you tune them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Billy Joel? Ugh.. Where's the youtube of you singing and playing a song you wrote? -- I like Billy Joel fine, I was referring to your new sock puppets lame "rock" reference.. *I do like gurly rock though, snip Have fun, Chicks Rock! A Hanna Montana fan..............that explains everything. Do you hang out at her concerts to check out the little girls Scotty? Sick. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com