![]() |
GM loses big-time
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES General Motors Corp. (GM) posted a stunning $15.5 billion second-quarter net loss, as the auto maker piled up $9.1 billion in charges and write-downs and suffered a deep drop in North American sales. The company had warned in mid-July that it would post "a significant second quarter loss." But the actual numbers were far worse than analysts had expected, and point to the enormous challenges facing GM as buyers turn away en masse from its most profitable offerings. GM shares fell more than 7% in premarket trading to $10.20. GM reported a net loss of $27.33 a share, compared with net income of $891 million, or $1.56 a share, a year earlier. Excluding items, the loss was $6.3 billion, or $11.21 a share. Revenue fell 18% to $38.2 billion. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had been looking for a loss, excluding items, of $2.62 a share on revenue of $44.57 billion. GM's Latin American operation was a bright spot - profit rose to $445 million from $296 million. But Asia swung to loss and European profits tumbled 94%. Excluding charges, the North American business had a $4.3 billion loss as revenue dropped by one-third to $19.8 billion, pushing market share down to 20.2% from 22.7%. A year ago, GM swung to a second-quarter profit as it relied on continued strength in international operations and a slim profit in its core North American automotive unit to dramatically improve its bottom line. GM's earnings were also dented by a $1.2 billion loss from its 49% stake in its GMAC LLC financing arm. Thursday, GMAC swung to a second-quarter loss as it took a $716 million write-down on leases and recorded more losses from its Residential Capital LLC unit. Second-quarter cash levels fell to $21 billion at the end of the second quarter from $23.9 billion at the end of the first quarter. The dismal second quarter caps four consecutive years of disappointing results, dating back to the beginning of 2005, when GM shocked Wall Street with an abrupt string of deep losses. Since then, Chief Executive Rick Wagoner has been racing to cut costs, slim down operations and remake the vehicle portfolio. *At the same time, Wagoner has invested heavily into emerging markets, placing big bets in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia even as market share dwindles at home.* - - - Any bets as to when GM will abandon manufacturing in the U.S. market? |
SPAM: wafaspam... more cut and paste
..
|
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. DOW JONES NEWSWIRES General Motors Corp. (GM) posted a stunning $15.5 billion second-quarter net loss, as the auto maker piled up $9.1 billion in charges and write-downs and suffered a deep drop in North American sales. The company had warned in mid-July that it would post "a significant second quarter loss." But the actual numbers were far worse than analysts had expected, and point to the enormous challenges facing GM as buyers turn away en masse from its most profitable offerings. GM shares fell more than 7% in premarket trading to $10.20. GM reported a net loss of $27.33 a share, compared with net income of $891 million, or $1.56 a share, a year earlier. Excluding items, the loss was $6.3 billion, or $11.21 a share. Revenue fell 18% to $38.2 billion. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had been looking for a loss, excluding items, of $2.62 a share on revenue of $44.57 billion. GM's Latin American operation was a bright spot - profit rose to $445 million from $296 million. But Asia swung to loss and European profits tumbled 94%. Excluding charges, the North American business had a $4.3 billion loss as revenue dropped by one-third to $19.8 billion, pushing market share down to 20.2% from 22.7%. A year ago, GM swung to a second-quarter profit as it relied on continued strength in international operations and a slim profit in its core North American automotive unit to dramatically improve its bottom line. GM's earnings were also dented by a $1.2 billion loss from its 49% stake in its GMAC LLC financing arm. Thursday, GMAC swung to a second-quarter loss as it took a $716 million write-down on leases and recorded more losses from its Residential Capital LLC unit. Second-quarter cash levels fell to $21 billion at the end of the second quarter from $23.9 billion at the end of the first quarter. The dismal second quarter caps four consecutive years of disappointing results, dating back to the beginning of 2005, when GM shocked Wall Street with an abrupt string of deep losses. Since then, Chief Executive Rick Wagoner has been racing to cut costs, slim down operations and remake the vehicle portfolio. *At the same time, Wagoner has invested heavily into emerging markets, placing big bets in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia even as market share dwindles at home.* - - - Any bets as to when GM will abandon manufacturing in the U.S. market? No time soon. Although dismal financial results, the bulk of the "losses" are write offs and charges to re-tool for the manufacture of more smaller, fuel efficient cars for the US market. Sounds horrible, and I am not making light of the problems, but it's not as bad as the media (and you) are making it out to be. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
BTW .... *This* little news tidbit ought to get your blood circulating ..... :-) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080801/...t_democrats_dc Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message . .. I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. DOW JONES NEWSWIRES General Motors Corp. (GM) posted a stunning $15.5 billion second-quarter net loss, as the auto maker piled up $9.1 billion in charges and write-downs and suffered a deep drop in North American sales. The company had warned in mid-July that it would post "a significant second quarter loss." But the actual numbers were far worse than analysts had expected, and point to the enormous challenges facing GM as buyers turn away en masse from its most profitable offerings. GM shares fell more than 7% in premarket trading to $10.20. GM reported a net loss of $27.33 a share, compared with net income of $891 million, or $1.56 a share, a year earlier. Excluding items, the loss was $6.3 billion, or $11.21 a share. Revenue fell 18% to $38.2 billion. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had been looking for a loss, excluding items, of $2.62 a share on revenue of $44.57 billion. GM's Latin American operation was a bright spot - profit rose to $445 million from $296 million. But Asia swung to loss and European profits tumbled 94%. Excluding charges, the North American business had a $4.3 billion loss as revenue dropped by one-third to $19.8 billion, pushing market share down to 20.2% from 22.7%. A year ago, GM swung to a second-quarter profit as it relied on continued strength in international operations and a slim profit in its core North American automotive unit to dramatically improve its bottom line. GM's earnings were also dented by a $1.2 billion loss from its 49% stake in its GMAC LLC financing arm. Thursday, GMAC swung to a second-quarter loss as it took a $716 million write-down on leases and recorded more losses from its Residential Capital LLC unit. Second-quarter cash levels fell to $21 billion at the end of the second quarter from $23.9 billion at the end of the first quarter. The dismal second quarter caps four consecutive years of disappointing results, dating back to the beginning of 2005, when GM shocked Wall Street with an abrupt string of deep losses. Since then, Chief Executive Rick Wagoner has been racing to cut costs, slim down operations and remake the vehicle portfolio. *At the same time, Wagoner has invested heavily into emerging markets, placing big bets in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia even as market share dwindles at home.* - - - Any bets as to when GM will abandon manufacturing in the U.S. market? No time soon. Although dismal financial results, the bulk of the "losses" are write offs and charges to re-tool for the manufacture of more smaller, fuel efficient cars for the US market. Sounds horrible, and I am not making light of the problems, but it's not as bad as the media (and you) are making it out to be. Eisboch I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. |
GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
BTW .... *This* little news tidbit ought to get your blood circulating ..... :-) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080801/...t_democrats_dc Eisboch I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. " (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc is mobilizing U.S. store managers to lobby against Democrats in November's presidential election, fearing they will make it easier for workers to unionize, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. In recent weeks, thousands of Wal-Mart managers and department heads have been summoned to mandatory meetings at which the retailer stresses the downside for workers if store workers unionize, the paper said." - - - Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Thank God most people realize they can't rely on social security alone in their retirement. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message . .. I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. |
GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Thank God most people realize they can't rely on social security alone in their retirement. Eisboch Yeah, well that wasn't the point, was it... |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Thank God most people realize they can't rely on social security alone in their retirement. Eisboch Yeah, well that wasn't the point, was it... Oh...and it's not that all corporations are bad all the time. While HP's telephone customer service for its comsumer products now sucks (it's been moved offshore and the phones are answered by automatons who can only read off a script), there still are a few thinking people employed at the company. One of my cats has decided the top of my little HP color laser printer is the best place to nap. The output tray at the rear of the machine apparently was annoying him, so he bounced on it until he broke it off. I sent an email to HP (I knew better than to call), and got a response that a new tray was being sent to me gratis, but that I would have to pay the $7 shipping charge. More than fair. They want a photo of the cat, too. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 9:20*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in messagenews:SdCdnTQC6JDYkw7VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comca st.com... I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, *it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. Yes he does! He's wished injury or death on several people here. |
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. |
GM loses big-time
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. What Harry is really saying: Free choice in shopping is fine as long as I can tell people what their choices are. |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Historically the "market" returns an annual average 10% return. Is that flim-flam? Please don't confuse this issue with facts. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message . .. I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Historically the "market" returns an annual average 10% return. Is that flim-flam? |
GM loses big-time
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message . .. I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch Reggie is an idiot. I don't "relish" GM's bad news. It means more bad news for its remaining workforce. Thank god the Bush-GOP plan to "privatize" social security so individuals could invest in the flim-flam game called the stock market got nowhere. Historically the "market" returns an annual average 10% return. Is that flim-flam? Oooops, sorry. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 9:20*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in messagenews:SdCdnTQC6JDYkw7VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comca st.com... I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, *it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. * Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. |
GM loses big-time
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:27:47 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch Harry (WAFA), being the hypocrite that he is, surely does not want any neighbors like that. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 11:28*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:27:47 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch Harry (WAFA), being the hypocrite that he is, surely does not want any neighbors like that.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How would you know? What we do know is wafa will take one side of an issue today, and another tomorrow, as long as he can **** you all off.. Like I have said before, I can't see why anyone would bother debating someone who is not going to debate honestly? It just makes no sense... You could have more fun debating yourself, and at least then it wouldn't get personal or vulgar which you know is the eventual outcome of any debate with our stooges... |
GM loses big-time
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:20:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message . .. I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch It's the same crap liberals spew whenever they get the chance. If a company is making a profit, it's bad. If a company is losing money, it's bad. If refineries were run by the government, it would be good. If cars were built by the government, it would be good. What horse****. But...oh, never mind. |
GM loses big-time
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch It would be better if Wal-Mart employees were all government workers. Then the man would be happy. |
GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch Many retirees were the most vocal against wal-mart's plans at the county meetings. As I stated, we already have a wal-mart. This is not a highly affluent county, by the way. It's still mostly rural, thank god. |
GM loses big-time
wrote in message ... On Aug 1, 9:20 am, "Eisboch" wrote: He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. I'd just sit back and enjoy it. It gets comical. You can't squash it. It's his reason for being. Eisboch |
GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 12:15*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch Many retirees were the most vocal against wal-mart's plans at the county * meetings. Sure wafa. Do the math Dick, he makes it up as he goes along.. As I stated, we already have a wal-mart. This is not a highly affluent county, by the way. It's still mostly rural, thank god.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
GM loses big-time
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch It would be better if Wal-Mart employees were all government workers. Then the man would be happy. Well, you worked for the gov't your whole life and seem to be enjoying those golden benefits. (pension plan). Your wife is a teacher?? I guess that could be considered gov't work. |
GM loses big-time
|
GM loses big-time
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:43:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I *love* it. It tells me Wal-Mart is scared. Wal-Mart is among the most exploitative major employers in the United States. The so-called "health insurance" it "offers" its employees is a fraud. It is a major violator of wage-hour laws. It is the major seller of crap ChiComm products in the USA. It seems to me that Wal-Mart has a specific goal to remain a low-cost outlet for limited income families and/or those that like to pinch pennys when buying basic necessities. In your quote you left out the part whereby by unionizing, Wal-Mart would need to raise prices and lay off employees. Why not let the public chose where they want to shop and work? Eisboch It would be better if Wal-Mart employees were all government workers. Then the man would be happy. Well, you worked for the gov't your whole life and seem to be enjoying those golden benefits. (pension plan). Your wife is a teacher?? I guess that could be considered gov't work. Isn't it interesting how lifelong government employees like Herring trash other government employees? And now that he is drawing a government employee pension, he still looks down his nose on other government employees. His wife is also a government employee, so she'll be getting a government employee pension, too. And they participate in a union-sponsored government employee health benefit plan. Herring is your typical right-wing Republican hypocrite. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 12:16*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 1, 9:20 am, "Eisboch" wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in messagenews:SdCdnTQC6JDYkw7VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comca st.com... I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, *it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. * Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. What, stimulate discussion? What's wrong with that? I'm bored with your guitars and kiddie motorcycle racing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At least my stories and opinions are real... |
GM loses big-time
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:15:20 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 1, 9:20 am, "Eisboch" wrote: He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. I'd just sit back and enjoy it. It gets comical. You can't squash it. It's his reason for being. Eisboch It would be much more fun to see him make a fool of himself. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 12:21*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 1, 11:28 am, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:27:47 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the "public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed. In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved building the new store. Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you. Eisboch Harry (WAFA), being the hypocrite that he is, surely does not want any neighbors like that.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How would you know? What we do know is wafa will take one side of an issue today, and another tomorrow, as long as he can **** you all off.. Like I have said before, I can't see why anyone would bother debating someone who is not going to debate honestly? B.S. *Previously, when you were lamenting the fact that some illegals had access to medical care and meds and you didn't, I asked you indirectly why you didn't take advantage of programs that were available to you. That shut you up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pfffft.... I investigated several options, I could not afford any of them with my income. I suppose if I were working with a fake id, I could make my income look any way I wanted.. But alas, they need my money to pay for the crims.... |
GM loses big-time
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:34:06 GMT, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:15:20 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 1, 9:20 am, "Eisboch" wrote: He's in warm-up mode for November. Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. I'd just sit back and enjoy it. It gets comical. You can't squash it. It's his reason for being. Eisboch It would be much more fun to see him make a fool of himself. By talking to himself. |
GM loses big-time
On Aug 1, 12:16*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 1, 9:20 am, "Eisboch" wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in messagenews:SdCdnTQC6JDYkw7VnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comca st.com... I am trying to figure out why Harry is relishing the fact that any company is having a downturn. It has a negative impact on individuals who have stock in the company, retirees who depend on dividends for part of their income, *it has a negative impact on the employees and the local and/or national economy. I guess Harry just enjoys seeing others hurt. I sincerely don't think Harry wants anybody hurt. He's in warm-up mode for November. * Happens every four years. Eisboch That's why I try to squash it, but it seems with 22 followup posts, you all want to talk about it here.. Seems you have forgotten what wafa can do to a group in an election year... geeze.. What, stimulate discussion? What's wrong with that? I'm bored with your guitars and kiddie motorcycle racing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Then leave. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com