On Jul 29, 7:19*am, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:00:05 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:14:12 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:23:22 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
...
Larry wrote:
HK wrote in news:6f6gllFa3gmfU1
@mid.individual.net:

Unitarian Universalist Church.

Unitarians are gay, are they not?....

The ones I know here are.....

I dunno, Larry. I'm sure some are, since "gayness" is not connected to
any
particular religion. Hell, there probably are some white southern
baptists
who actually follow the teachings of jesus. They're out there
somewhere.

I think gays are Unitarian, Catholic, Jewish, Episcopalian, Buddhist,
most
others *and .... ummm .. Atheist.

Not to mention all colors of the rainbow.

Get it - colors - rainbow?

Um...

Never mind.

=================

Who would have guessed that we had so many experts.

Not too many years ago it was "normal" to be anti-gay. * Now, you're called
homophobic.

Eisboch

I disagree.

I'm definitely anti- the gay lifestyle I see promoted in the San Francisco
parades, etc. I am against gays adopting and the use of the word 'marriage'
in whatever union they form with each other.

On the other hand, I'm not obsessed with 'gayness' as are a couple folks
right here on the group. I think they fear they may themselves be gay, and
that fear drives their consistently 'anti gay' rhetoric.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I lived there, and to tell the truth, I agree *somewhat*. Speaking
very broadly, and very generally, I noticed two types of gays. There
were those who led their lives normally like any couple would, and
then there were those who, in open public, acted worse than any
heterosexual couple would EVER act, you'd think they were going to
copulate right there on the street! I wouldn't want my kids seeing
that be it heterosexual, homosexual, metrosexual, or any of the other
sexuals and isms!