http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not
quite as grandiose!

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not
quite as grandiose!


When are you taking your first really long trip?

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:54:48 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not
quite as grandiose!

Just be sure it's not as high (-:

--Vic

Stupidity at it's finest. Wonder if the son can spell 'stupid'.
JR


Vic Smith wrote:

http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth

Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

Poor design. It cantilevers out too far and the supports are
substandard. That canopy should have held up much better than that -
the trailer was barely damaged. Fortunately, no one else was under it
at the time.

On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are
substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that -
the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it
at the time.

it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist
other forces, mainly in that configuration wind.

On Jul 18, 9:06*am, wrote:
On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are
substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that -
the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it
at the time.

it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist
other forces, mainly in that configuration wind.

Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the
result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who
would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not
assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers,
useless Should have been designed by a technition...

On Jul 18, 9:14*am, wrote:
On Jul 18, 9:06*am, wrote:





On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are
substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that -
the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it
at the time.

it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist
other forces, mainly in that configuration wind.

Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the
result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who
would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not
assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers,
useless * Should have been designed by a technition...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cost dictates a lot of things.

wrote in message
...
On Jul 18, 9:06 am, wrote:
On Jul 17, 7:39 pm, DK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2

Be careful out there.

--Vic

Poor design. It cantilevers out too far and the supports are
substandard. That canopy should have held up much better than that -
the trailer was barely damaged. Fortunately, no one else was under it
at the time.

it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist
other forces, mainly in that configuration wind.

Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the
result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who
would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not
assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers,
useless Should have been designed by a technition...

Not one that can't spell technician.