| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Ping: JohnH
|
Ping: JohnH
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not quite as grandiose! |
Ping: JohnH
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not quite as grandiose! When are you taking your first really long trip? |
Ping: JohnH
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:54:48 -0400, John H.
wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic I'll get a picture of mine so you can see what I'm dealing with. It's not quite as grandiose! Just be sure it's not as high (-: --Vic |
Ping: JohnH
Stupidity at it's finest. Wonder if the son can spell 'stupid'.
JR Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth |
Ping: JohnH
Vic Smith wrote:
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic Poor design. It cantilevers out too far and the supports are substandard. That canopy should have held up much better than that - the trailer was barely damaged. Fortunately, no one else was under it at the time. |
Ping: JohnH
On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that - the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it at the time. it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist other forces, mainly in that configuration wind. |
Ping: JohnH
On Jul 18, 9:06*am, wrote:
On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that - the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it at the time. it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist other forces, mainly in that configuration wind. Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers, useless Should have been designed by a technition... |
Ping: JohnH
On Jul 18, 9:14*am, wrote:
On Jul 18, 9:06*am, wrote: On Jul 17, 7:39*pm, DK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic Poor design. *It cantilevers out too far and the supports are substandard. *That canopy should have held up much better than that - the trailer was barely damaged. *Fortunately, no one else was under it at the time. it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist other forces, mainly in that configuration wind. Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers, useless * Should have been designed by a technition...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cost dictates a lot of things. |
Ping: JohnH
wrote in message ... On Jul 18, 9:06 am, wrote: On Jul 17, 7:39 pm, DK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: http://www.kare11.com/news/news_arti...519027&catid=2 Be careful out there. --Vic Poor design. It cantilevers out too far and the supports are substandard. That canopy should have held up much better than that - the trailer was barely damaged. Fortunately, no one else was under it at the time. it just wasn't designed for side impact. It was designed to resist other forces, mainly in that configuration wind. Well, then.. It was designed without much foresight. Do you think the result would have been different if the guy hit the post.. And who would design something like that to sit in a parking lot and not assume it might get bumped by a moving vehicle.. idiots, engineers, useless Should have been designed by a technition... Not one that can't spell technician. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com