On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:40:02 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:50:36 -0700 (PDT), penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Jul 15, 1:37*pm, wrote:
| On Jul 15, 12:26*pm, wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
| On Jul 15, 11:00*am, wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 10:37*am, wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 10:31*am, JimH wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 9:16*am, "Lu Powell" wrote:
|
| A recent column by Thomas Sowell:
|
| http://snsimages.tribune.com/media/p...7/41002347.jpg
|
| Even your heroes of the right wing media thought that was over the
| line in terms of racism. I guess you think it's just grand, huh, low
| life?
|
| I'm confused. *I thought you were gone? *Is this an imposter?
|
| I don't subscribe to rec.boats anymore. I can, however, log in and
| post. I never said that I'd never post or look here again.
|
| idiot- Hide quoted text -
|
| - Show quoted text -
|
|What is idiotic about that?

(1) You can't be reading this, nor respond to it, without
"subscribing" to rec.boats.... even Google groups is using that
terminology.

(2) You posted that you were "out" and that others would know how to
contact you, if they wished. That clearly indicates that you wouldn't
be "here."

|Are you going to start acting like the low
|lifes Harry and JimH and start childish name calling and third grade
|insults?

Idiot was probably used as a pejorative term and was not proper.
Addict is more accurate, descriptive, and carries no pejorative
connotation. You are merely addicted to posting personally held
dogmatic positions at rec.boats that tend to anger other posters.

You've made worthwhile contributions in the past. I simply don't
understand where you are coming from, now. This is becoming as surreal
as my last (verbal) conversation with Skipper.

If he is using Agent, it is not necessary to 'subscribe' to a group to see
headers, read the posts, or respond to the posts. One simply looks in the
"All Groups" list, finds 'rec.boats' and downloads the headers.

Yes, Loogy has made some great contributions and can be a lot of fun. But
he, like a couple others, is obsessed with an urge to respond to every HK
and JimH post that is made.

It's a damn shame.

On Jul 15, 6:34*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:40:02 -0400, Gene Kearns



wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:50:36 -0700 (PDT), penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Jul 15, 1:37*pm, wrote:
| On Jul 15, 12:26*pm, wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
| On Jul 15, 11:00*am, wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 10:37*am, wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 10:31*am, JimH wrote:
|
| On Jul 15, 9:16*am, "Lu Powell" wrote:
|
| A recent column by Thomas Sowell:
|
| http://snsimages.tribune.com/media/p...7/41002347.jpg
|
| Even your heroes of the right wing media thought that was over the
| line in terms of racism. I guess you think it's just grand, huh, low
| life?
|
| I'm confused. *I thought you were gone? *Is this an imposter?
|
| I don't subscribe to rec.boats anymore. I can, however, log in and
| post. I never said that I'd never post or look here again.
|
| idiot- Hide quoted text -
|
| - Show quoted text -
|
|What is idiotic about that?

(1) You can't be reading this, nor respond to it, without
"subscribing" to rec.boats.... even Google groups is using that
terminology.

(2) You posted that you were "out" and that others would know how to
contact you, if they wished. That clearly indicates that you wouldn't
be "here."

|Are you going to start acting like the low
|lifes Harry and JimH and start childish name calling and third grade
|insults?

Idiot was probably used as a pejorative term and was not proper.
Addict is more accurate, descriptive, and carries no pejorative
connotation. You are merely addicted to posting personally held
dogmatic positions at rec.boats that tend to anger other posters.

You've made worthwhile contributions in the past. I simply don't
understand where you are coming from, now. This is becoming as surreal
as my last (verbal) conversation with Skipper.

If he is using Agent, it is not necessary to 'subscribe' to a group to see
headers, read the posts, or respond to the posts. One simply looks in the
"All Groups" list, finds 'rec.boats' and downloads the headers.

Yes, Loogy has made some great contributions and can be a lot of fun. But
he, like a couple others, is obsessed with an urge to respond to every HK
and JimH post that is made.

It's a damn shame.

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.

On Jul 15, 6:38*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 15, 6:34*pm, John H. wrote:

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.-

A "grown man" does not send emails under false pretenses to a company
to get quotes back from them so he can post them to "prove" a point
that was not even being debated in the first place, and then proclaim
"Game, set, match" when he has "proven" the wrong point. All the
while proclaiming in post after post how he's proven this person
wrong, and that person wrong.

No, a grown man does not do that. A senile one, yes. That's a shame.
roll eyes

On Jul 15, 10:08*pm, wrote:
On Jul 15, 6:38*pm, JimH wrote:

On Jul 15, 6:34*pm, John H. wrote:

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.-

A "grown man" does not send emails under false pretenses to a company
to get quotes back from them so he can post them to "prove" a point
that was not even being debated in the first place, and then proclaim
"Game, set, match" when he has "proven" the wrong point. *All the
while proclaiming in post after post how he's proven this person
wrong, and that person wrong.

No, a grown man does not do that. *A senile one, yes. *That's a shame..
roll eyes

I did it to prove a point against something that was brought up here
too many times.

I did it as a grown man trying to stop that crap. It was a simple
solution.

Now STFU and stop your whining as the case is now closed.

BTW: Who's hand do you belong to Mr. Sockpuppet?

On Jul 15, 11:01*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 15, 10:08*pm, wrote:



On Jul 15, 6:38*pm, JimH wrote:

On Jul 15, 6:34*pm, John H. wrote:

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.-

A "grown man" does not send emails under false pretenses to a company
to get quotes back from them so he can post them to "prove" a point
that was not even being debated in the first place, and then proclaim
"Game, set, match" when he has "proven" the wrong point. *All the
while proclaiming in post after post how he's proven this person
wrong, and that person wrong.

No, a grown man does not do that. *A senile one, yes. *That's a shame.
roll eyes

I did it to prove a point against something that was brought up here
too many times.

I did it as a grown man trying to stop that crap. * It was a simple
solution.

Now STFU and stop your whining as the case is now closed.

BTW: *Who's hand do you belong to Mr. Sockpuppet?

Doh!

Whose hand...........not Who's hand

The question remains though.

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Jul 15, 10:08 pm, wrote:
On Jul 15, 6:38 pm, JimH wrote:

On Jul 15, 6:34 pm, John H. wrote:

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.-

A "grown man" does not send emails under false pretenses to a company
to get quotes back from them so he can post them to "prove" a point
that was not even being debated in the first place, and then proclaim
"Game, set, match" when he has "proven" the wrong point. All the
while proclaiming in post after post how he's proven this person
wrong, and that person wrong.

No, a grown man does not do that. A senile one, yes. That's a shame.
roll eyes

I did it to prove a point against something that was brought up here
too many times.

I did it as a grown man trying to stop that crap. It was a simple
solution.

Now STFU and stop your whining as the case is now closed.

BTW: Who's hand do you belong to Mr. Sockpuppet?

You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU because a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.

"Jim" wrote in message
...


You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU because a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.

Yeah but...just think how much the newsgroup would improve if you did.

On Jul 16, 9:28*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...



You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU because a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.

Yeah but...just think how much the newsgroup would improve if you did.

Florida Jim has no interest in improving the tone and quality of this
NG.

Jim wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Jul 15, 10:08 pm, wrote:
On Jul 15, 6:38 pm, JimH wrote:

On Jul 15, 6:34 pm, John H. wrote:

The damn shame is that Loogy, DK, FL Jim, BAR and several others here,
including you, cannot behave like grown men and perpetuate the problem
with this NG.-

A "grown man" does not send emails under false pretenses to a company
to get quotes back from them so he can post them to "prove" a point
that was not even being debated in the first place, and then proclaim
"Game, set, match" when he has "proven" the wrong point. All the
while proclaiming in post after post how he's proven this person
wrong, and that person wrong.

No, a grown man does not do that. A senile one, yes. That's a shame.
roll eyes

I did it to prove a point against something that was brought up here
too many times.

I did it as a grown man trying to stop that crap. It was a simple
solution.

Now STFU and stop your whining as the case is now closed.

BTW: Who's hand do you belong to Mr. Sockpuppet?

You don't close cases around here Jimmy boy. And we don't STFU because a
deranged nincompoop tells us to.




Florida Jim, the "tough little turd," and partial father of loogy...

John H. wrote:

Yes, Loogy has made some great contributions and can be a lot of fun.


Bullschitt