OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs
to inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.


Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:
Can you read headers?
Does the bear **** in the woods?
--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?
Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic
I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.
Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Wow! Dummy Don posted more than one line. Freakin amazing! What's
interesting is that he not only admits to *never* leaving (a lie) but he
also admits that he is part of a tiny gang - or at least a screwed up
conspiracy of rabid losers.

What a huge favoursic he/they is/are doing for you.

Loogy, Justwait & JohnH are worth more than a one liner..... you, Flatulent
Jim, Whine etc.......... a one worder would be more than sufficient.
Anyway..learn to read for content. I admitted nothing.... I said I left and
I did. You were the dumbass that invited me back, so if anyone else here
has a problem with me, they can thank you.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 7:35*pm, DK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:



Don White wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs
to inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.

Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. *I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. *I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. *He's just dumb - in the literal sense.


Read the responses from DK, Reggie Loogy and BAR and ask yourself if
you think they really want to improve the tone and quality of this NG
or just want to continue to blame others for it's downfall.

A bunch of old men acting like children.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.


Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure hope
you are not reflective of most Canadians

He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

Tell your girlfriend I sure hope he isn't a prime example of Georgia
residents. (not withstanding the 'Deliverence set')

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Don White wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with
agitators, instigators & enablers.

Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure hope
you are not reflective of most Canadians
He's not very bright. I've spent enough time in Canada to know that he
doesn't represent the majority. He's just dumb - in the literal sense.

Tell your girlfriend I sure hope he isn't a prime example of Georgia
residents. (not withstanding the 'Deliverence set')




Most of the dialog from the Seven Dwarfs is right out of Deliverance.
Loogy is the banjo boy.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 4:02*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------**------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later..
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! *Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------**------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger He invited us back..

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 18, 9:19*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------***------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger * He invited us back..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm invited you (as in you, Harry, and JimH) to leave! See ya!

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 18, 10:41*am, wrote:
On Jul 18, 9:19*am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 4:02 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as
if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------****------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you
in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and
irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the
hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It worked out just GREAT for everyone except you, Harry, and his
girlfriend JimH.

Hey..if you don't like it, complain to Freddy Kruger * He invited us back..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm invited you (as in you, Harry, and JimH) to leave! See ya!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd like to see a bunch of idiots in this group gone but you told us
all you were leaving so by all means gtf out.