OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:20:29 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:09:47 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:56:01 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0
as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could
read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more
obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what
newsreader I use.


The header of a post does not reveal the newsreader used unless one
has
turned on 'Show All Header Fields'. I don't normally wish to see
all the
header fields because then I must scroll down to read the message.
Do you
keep the header fields shown all the time?
No, but Vic posted as if he knew what reader I was using, when he is
obviously clueless. This was a case where an intelligent person would
have looked at the headers before posting. He also can't seem to
directly answer simple and completely unambiguous questions.
The 'un-ambiguity' may be in the eyes of the beholder. Headers, at
least in
Agent, are not the same as 'Header Fields'.
You asked Vic if he could read headers. He answered that he could. You
responded with a less than flattering comment, because you were
referring
to headers when you meant header fields.

Sure, Harry. Whatever you say.

Harry is way out of his depth of knowledge when speaking about all
things USENET. I proved that a couple of years ago when I outed him.



Whooooooosh.

Start over, braindead.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves. You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:03*pm, wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:54*am, "Don White" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

Why not take responsibility for your juvenile behavior here rather
than blaming it on others.

You just do not have any self control.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:08*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:
Can you read headers?
Does the bear **** in the woods?
--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?
Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.
--Vic
I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.
Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

"...the group has *went* backwards..."

Crikey, what an uneducated, ignorant ass you are, Loogy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, I wish I'd have wasted my life with a liberal arts degree so
that I could use correct grammer at all times in usenet, idiot.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:33*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves. You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in a
New York second. *They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate..........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. *Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Jul 17, 12:37*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 17, 12:03*pm, wrote:





On Jul 17, 8:54*am, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. * All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. *I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. *Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business *(too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.

Why not take responsibility for your juvenile behavior here rather
than blaming it on others.

You just do not have any self control.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I take it you haven't seen any of the hundreds of Harry posts here the
last few weeks? Either that, or you're not bright enough to understand
the dynamics.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:48:33 -0400, wrote:



I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I use.

Well, I answered this before. I'll add there is no reason for me to
care what reader you use by looking at header fields.
I've pretty much given up on usenet Dick Tracy activities, and hardly
ever engage in "technical" discussions since I retired from that.
My original reply to you was to correct the misinformation you posted
about retrieving messages from "unsubscribed" groups with Agent
versions prior to 2.0.
I naturally assumed you had moved on to a newer version because
you seem intelligent enough not to post misinformation about the very
version you are currently using to make the post.
Anyway, my intent was to be helpful.
I wasn't playing "gotcha." You are free to think of me as you chose.
God Bless America!

--Vic

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

wrote in message
...
On Jul 17, 12:33 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jul 17, 8:54 am, "Don White" wrote:





wrote in message

.. .

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic

If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic

I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader
I
use.

Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this
Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)

I agree, the group has went backwards ever since you and Harry and his
girlfriend JimH reappeared. Why don't you disappear again? And that's
not neccesarily meant to you, because alone, you're congenial, but
when you get with the other two, it's a threesome beyond belief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*------

So...let's review the recent past.
Harry and Jim left for greener pastures and I followed a few days later.
What happened..???
We had clowns like DK posting about us...remember his heading?..
"The three stooges have left the building"
We were gone and yet your fellow 'misfits' couldn't control themselves.
You
do know that if Harry, Jim & I disappeared tonight, they'd turn on you in
a
New York second. They are here to agitate, instigate and irritate.........
and anyone would do as their victim.
When you think about it...we're doing you a favour by taking all the hits
and attention. Be careful what you wish for.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm wishing as hard as I can! Leave, give it a try!


Been there...done that! Didn't work out.
You really should talk to someone about your short/long term memory.

OT Are Facts Obsolete?
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:13:53 -0500, Vic Smith

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:12 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:49:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:42:14 -0400, wrote:

Can you read headers?

Does the bear **** in the woods?

--Vic
If that's where he is when the mood strikes. Can you read headers?

Not sure if you're serious, since you were talking about pre 2.0 as if
you knew it. All 1.93 and previous Agent versions I've used use
header-based retrievals.
Options allow for message body retrieval upon header retrieval but
mine are set for headers only. I pull message bodies separately to
avoid pulling in spam.
Parsing the server side message ID's to match the Agent counters
when retrieving "latest" seems to be "slow" part of Agent.
Message body retrieval is normally very fast.

--Vic


I diodn't ask if Agent could read headers. I asked if YOU could read
headers.
You can't even answer that simple question. It's more and more obvious
that YOU
don't know how, or you would have read mine and known what newsreader I
use.


Great...another DK or Flatulent Jim. Just what this newsgroup needs to
inprove.
We seem to be going backwards instead of forward. Time to forget this Dwarf
Army business (too many clowns lining up to enlist)
We need a good old fashioned sheriff who knows how to deal with agitators,
instigators & enablers.



Don, you would be the first one to go, no sheriff wants to deal with a
pansy ass agitator, instigator and enabler such as yourself. I sure
hope you are not reflective of most Canadians

OT Are Facts Obsolete?