Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Gene Kearns wrote:
| Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
|
|Does said boat in questions exist?

I don't know, nor do I care.

I understand, integrity means nothing to you?

BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Gene Kearns wrote:
| Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
|
|Does said boat in questions exist?

I don't know, nor do I care.

I understand, integrity means nothing to you?

Bertie Robbins, known far and wide as POT-KETTLE-BLACK, and a little
less widely as a member of the Sissyhood of the Seven Dwarfs.

On Jul 7, 2:53*pm, BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Gene Kearns wrote:
| Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
|
|Does said boat in questions exist?

I don't know, nor do I care.

I understand, integrity means nothing to you?

I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....

wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|Gene Kearns wrote:
| Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
|
|Does said boat in questions exist?
I don't know, nor do I care.
I understand, integrity means nothing to you?

I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....



You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with
your obsession.

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

wrote:
| On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote:
| Gene Kearns wrote:
| On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
| |Gene Kearns wrote:
| | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
| |
| |Does said boat in questions exist?
| I don't know, nor do I care.
| I understand, integrity means nothing to you?
|
| I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
| doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
| is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
| intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
| mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....
|
|
|
|You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with
|your obsession.

You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped....
assuming you want to.....



Gene, I know you have the best of intentions, but I really truly believe
rec.boats is so overpopulated with snarly little assholes like the Seven
Dwarfs there is no hope for its salvation. The future for those who want
to discuss boating in a reasonable fashion and still have fun is in
moderated newsgroups or in discussion groups.

Here's the final scene for an upcoming HBO movie:


....from "REC.BOATS...THE NEWSGROUP OF THE DWARFS..."



You Seven Dwarfs finally really did it.



You maniacs!



You blew it up!



God damn you!



God damn you all to hell!





:)

On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of
a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy."

Amen.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of
a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy."

Amen.


Hey, I'm mostly *here* to watch the performing Dwarfs destroy rec.boats.
If you two think you can salvage this place, go for it. But Reggie,
Herring, Loogie, Florida Jim, BAR, DK, and whoever the revolving idiot
of the day is, prefer it to remain as it is. If they preferred
otherwise, they'd behave differently.

We'll see what you fellows do to handle the Dwarfs. I'll be glad to watch.

On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:33:43 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

wrote:
| On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote:
| Gene Kearns wrote:
| On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
| |Gene Kearns wrote:
| | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
| |
| |Does said boat in questions exist?
| I don't know, nor do I care.
| I understand, integrity means nothing to you?
|
| I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
| doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
| is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
| intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
| mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....
|
|
|
|You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with
|your obsession.

You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped....
assuming you want to.....

Gene, I don't know where you've been, but that "...assuming you want to..."
sure doesn't apply in this case. It's hard for me to believe that you would
think Harry *doesn't* want this group to disappear.

If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication
about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very
naive.

As you can see from Harry's response to your post, he will use anything as
a means to drop some more crap in the group. Those who continue responding
to him simply give him the means to do so.

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:33:43 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

wrote:
| On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote:
| Gene Kearns wrote:
| On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
| |Gene Kearns wrote:
| | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
| |
| |Does said boat in questions exist?
| I don't know, nor do I care.
| I understand, integrity means nothing to you?
|
| I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
| doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
| is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
| intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
| mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....
|
|
|
|You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with
|your obsession.

You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped....
assuming you want to.....

Gene, I don't know where you've been, but that "...assuming you want to..."
sure doesn't apply in this case. It's hard for me to believe that you would
think Harry *doesn't* want this group to disappear.

If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication
about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very
naive.

As you can see from Harry's response to your post, he will use anything as
a means to drop some more crap in the group. Those who continue responding
to him simply give him the means to do so.


The reality is, this newsgroup has disappeared as a venue for boaters,
in no small part because of the posts of you and your fellow dwarfs. And
despite your wet dream, I am in communication with no one regarding ways
to "make the place worse."

"John H." wrote in message
...
snip..
If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication
about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very
naive.

snip...


Johnny...are you overdosing on Twinkies again?