Thanks, Salty. Keep spreading the message.

On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of
a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy."

Amen.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of
a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy."

Amen.


Hey, I'm mostly *here* to watch the performing Dwarfs destroy rec.boats.
If you two think you can salvage this place, go for it. But Reggie,
Herring, Loogie, Florida Jim, BAR, DK, and whoever the revolving idiot
of the day is, prefer it to remain as it is. If they preferred
otherwise, they'd behave differently.

We'll see what you fellows do to handle the Dwarfs. I'll be glad to watch.

On Jul 7, 7:54*am, wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:10*pm, wrote:





On Jul 6, 8:59*pm, "Jim" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:

12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot

Who got booted, how long?

I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him an
indeterminate sentence.

Yeah, I went and saw it. I didn't think his comment was any snarkier
than the others.. Maybe it was the target? *Or maybe cause it was
"hidden", either way, I am walking very lightly over there.. I did
notice however, one of the top posters mentioned us by name.. but it
was not a negative comment.. Either way, I still don't think there is
a definate line yet, maybe the mod over there is still setting it..

Note to the stooges, I am not complaining here. I still support Chuck
and his adventure..

Yeah, it was "hidden". He only asked about fuel burn on Harry's
alleged lobster boat, and didn't do it in a menacing manner. Harry
claims to own a lobster boat, so why would someone be banned for
asking a question about it?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

By the way it was said, pea-brain...

On Jul 7, 7:55*am, wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:12*pm, JimH wrote:





On Jul 6, 8:59*pm, "Jim" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:

12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot

Who got booted, how long?

I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him an
indeterminate sentence.

He-he. *My prediction came true.

You guys keep falling like flies. * Learn to behave and you won't get
banned.

You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR
is next.

This is just too funny.

Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of
Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking
about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're stupider than your ramblings tend to identify......

Did this man...well....(LOOSLY)....fall on his head while riding an MX
as a kid???

I would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would
be put
in time out also.

So, Harrys gonna get binned for mentioning (himself) about the boat
you say he doesnt own??

You 're worse than a Soap Opera

Or, maybe...

A "Dwarf Opera"

and whoever the floating idiot of the day in that group...

God....that was great. I near ****ed my pants laughing.

"floating"......

is a boating forum after all.

I bet he got swooped on the " Go get me a can of Steam " joke.......

On Jul 8, 10:23*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message

. com...







After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane,
decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster
boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of
code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and
mine differ greatly.

That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner.
Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more
inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about
some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and
neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of
"integrity."

I suggest you address all of those concerns at
rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested
boating to fend for themselves, here......

Well said. *Anyone here longer than a month and with half a brain knows....
A/ After all the harassment over the years, Harry will never disclose any
additional information on any Lobster boat
B/ *Those who keep bringing the Lobster boat up only do it as a way to jab
and agitate Harry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why should it agitate Harry to bring up one of his boats?

wrote:
On Jul 8, 10:23 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message

. com...







After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane,
decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster
boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of
code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and
mine differ greatly.
That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner.
Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more
inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about
some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and
neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of
"integrity."
I suggest you address all of those concerns at
rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested
boating to fend for themselves, here......
Well said. Anyone here longer than a month and with half a brain knows...
A/ After all the harassment over the years, Harry will never disclose any
additional information on any Lobster boat
B/ Those who keep bringing the Lobster boat up only do it as a way to jab
and agitate Harry- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why should it agitate Harry to bring up one of his boats?


You're the one who is agitated, justwaitaloogy. In fact, you're obsessed.