| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
Take their bikes away from them, their dangerous
Also take their shoes away from them, too dangerous to be outside walking. Do not allow them outside of their room, too many things to bump into. Do not let them outside, WAY too dangerous, what with insects that bite, poison ivy, etc. Round off all sharp corners in the home, including furniture, walls, etc, then pad everything with a minimum of 3" of closed cell foam, those hard walls and sharp corners are very dangerous. Do not EVER take a child in a car, there is a chance of an accident. Don't ever take a child in a boat, again, accidents happen. You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster. A child should never, ever be allowed to play with another child, it's just too risky. The only downside that one may experience with this is their children might be inclined to join the military to get some real life experience instead of going to college. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
|
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. :) |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 8:48*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. *:) Yes, I have too, and it's no small wonder that those children grew up to be afraid of everything. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
|
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 8:48*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. *:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...llow-your.html There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 10:23*am, wrote:
On Jun 18, 8:48*am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. *:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles - "You can't have one, and don't get on one. Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. Lots of traffic. Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. What I did with mine was pay them a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 11:50*am, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Take their bikes away from them, their dangerous Also take their shoes away from them, too dangerous to be outside walking. Do not allow them outside of their room, too many things to bump into. Do not let them outside, WAY too dangerous, what with insects that bite, poison ivy, etc. Round off all sharp corners in the home, including furniture, walls, etc, then pad everything with a minimum of 3" of closed cell foam, those hard walls and sharp corners are very dangerous. Do not EVER take a child in a car, there is a chance of an accident. Don't ever take a child in a boat, again, accidents happen. You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster. A child should never, ever be allowed to play with another child, it's just too risky. The only downside that one may experience with this is their children might be inclined to join the military to get some real life experience instead of going to college. I agree and they should not be permitted to fish or swim. Really......http://www.smh.com.au/news/unusual-t...-and-attacks-b... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Exactly! There are just so many things that people allow their children to do that must stop! Checkers and Chess come to mind, the pieces are choke hazards. My son loves to help me wash my truck, but I shouldn't let him do that, there is a risk of slipping in the suds. The list goes on! |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 12:22*pm, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things.... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles *- "You can't have one, and don't get on one. *Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. *Lots of traffic. *Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. *You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. *What I did with mine was pay them *a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. *They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There are those here who think that you should be turned into "child protective services" for allowing your kids the freedom to *test the waters* so to speak. You are suggesting skydiving, they will certainly throw a hissy fit about that if they whine about a small low powered motocross bike! I had a mini bike at around 9, then motorcycles, then racing motocross ones, then snowmobiles, then racing snowmobiles. What the fools don't understand is the responsiblity is vast from doing something like that, you have to maintain, fix, get race ready, enter the races, etc. Besides, I always, always take time for my kids, they love doing things with me as much as I love doing things with them. I just don't think it'd be the same if I had to put them in full body armour to go fly a kite..... |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 1:02*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 12:22*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles *- "You can't have one, and don't get on one. *Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. *Lots of traffic. *Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. *You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. *What I did with mine was pay them *a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. *They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There are those here who think that you should be turned into "child protective services" for allowing your kids the freedom to *test the waters* so to speak. You are suggesting skydiving, they will certainly throw a hissy fit about that if they whine about a small low powered motocross bike! I had a mini bike at around 9, then motorcycles, then racing motocross ones, then snowmobiles, then racing snowmobiles. What the fools don't understand is the responsiblity is vast from doing something like that, you have to maintain, fix, get race ready, enter the races, etc. Besides, I always, always take time for my kids, they love doing things with me as much as I love doing things with them. I just don't think it'd be the same if I had to put them in full body armour to go fly a kite..... http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/norw...te/ci_9619906- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your point? Children are killed every day at all sorts of activities, including baseball, football, soccer, etc. Should we deny them the pleasure of those things also? What about fishing? Drowning is a big part of juvenile deaths. What about taking them to the playground? You must take them, you certainly can't expect them to be responsible enough to walk there..... The playground is an accident waiting to happen. Skating? Oh, no! Hiking? Nope, risk of injury or death there! Camping? Nope, risk of snakebite, rabid squirrels, etc. I guess they could sit in there padded rooms and read until they get old enough and tired of it enough to get out of the prison/home...... |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 1:02*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 12:22*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles *- "You can't have one, and don't get on one. *Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. *Lots of traffic. *Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. *You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. *What I did with mine was pay them *a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. *They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There are those here who think that you should be turned into "child protective services" for allowing your kids the freedom to *test the waters* so to speak. You are suggesting skydiving, they will certainly throw a hissy fit about that if they whine about a small low powered motocross bike! I had a mini bike at around 9, then motorcycles, then racing motocross ones, then snowmobiles, then racing snowmobiles. What the fools don't understand is the responsiblity is vast from doing something like that, you have to maintain, fix, get race ready, enter the races, etc. Besides, I always, always take time for my kids, they love doing things with me as much as I love doing things with them. I just don't think it'd be the same if I had to put them in full body armour to go fly a kite..... http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/norw...te/ci_9619906- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here's a little info, I really like the last paragraph: A Philadelphia orthopedic surgeon, Joseph S. Torg of Temple University's medical school, was the first to study this problem after 1975, when a dozen local football players suffered serious spinal injuries, with one dying and eight becoming quadriplegics. Torg recommended teaching athletes not to hit others with the top of their heads, instead training them to protect their spines. While there is still an average of six such injuries annually in the last 13 years, the safety campaign has clearly worked. Now, this kind of injury has become thankfully rare. "If you look at the actual chances of becoming a quadriplegic from football, it's one out of 192,000 players," Boden says. Injuries to ankles, knees, hands and so on, that's another story. Other risky sports: ice hockey, skydiving, scuba diving, cheerleading and gymnastics. Cheerleading and gymnastics? Absolutely, experts say. Cheerleading is actually the most injury-prone sport for women. Being tossed high into the air by teammates is risky business for the head and spine, and ankle injuries are common. But whether it's football, cycling or cheerleading, doctors say there are ways to keep safe. Rule No. 1: Don't get in over your head. "You have to compete at a level at which you're accustomed, and that's compatible with your level of talent," says Edward McFarland, an orthopedic surgeon at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. Train slowly, working your way up to more strenuous play, and make sure you know the proper technique: Don't hit that double-black-diamond trail if you've just learned how to ski. Good gear is also key. "To reduce the risk of serious head injury and even save your life, wear the right type of helmet, when appropriate," Flecha says. Rule 2: Let things heal. After an injury, serious or not, stay on the sidelines until you're better, or you risk doing even more damage. "The smartest advice is, if something bothers you during or after, stop or do less, and don't do anything until it feels 100% better," says orthopedic surgeon Robert Marx, the orthopedic director of the Sports Medicine Institute for Young Athletes at New York City's Hospital for Special Surgery. Still, physicians caution that parents shouldn't over-hype the dangers of sports. The idea should be to play carefully, but definitely play. "You can't be overly injury-conscious, because you may lead children away from sports," Marx says. "The biggest problem we're having is that kids aren't doing enough, and there are high rates of childhood obesity." |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
|
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:22:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles - "You can't have one, and don't get on one. Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. Lots of traffic. Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. What I did with mine was pay them a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic Vic, do you really think you did a good job when you've not heard from them in some years? -- John *H* |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 1:26*pm, JimH wrote:
A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756.... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...hild-dies.html Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...en-toy-hazards Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...hild-dies.html Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...en-toy-hazards Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 1:50*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 1:26*pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756.... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. Did you even bother to read the article? I don't think so. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756.... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child.... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr.... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:28:28 -0400, John H.
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:22:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles - "You can't have one, and don't get on one. Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. Lots of traffic. Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. What I did with mine was pay them a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic Vic, do you really think you did a good job when you've not heard from them in some years? It's hard to communicate from the penitentiary. Damn, I have to stop this. John, except for first and last parts it was BS. Just seeing if anybody pays attention. I salute you! I was thinking of my late uncle Russ, who used to tell me these tall tales all the time. He was a pleasure to fish with. I can still see his eyes watching me as he'd spin a yarn, some true, some half-true, and some all BS. He was watching to see what I was believing, so he could either continue or start laughing with me. He was an expert at talking facts then gradually veering into the ridiculous, often catching me off-guard. --Vic |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:28:28 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:22:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles - "You can't have one, and don't get on one. Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. Lots of traffic. Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. What I did with mine was pay them a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic Vic, do you really think you did a good job when you've not heard from them in some years? It's hard to communicate from the penitentiary. Damn, I have to stop this. John, except for first and last parts it was BS. Just seeing if anybody pays attention. I salute you! I was thinking of my late uncle Russ, who used to tell me these tall tales all the time. He was a pleasure to fish with. I can still see his eyes watching me as he'd spin a yarn, some true, some half-true, and some all BS. He was watching to see what I was believing, so he could either continue or start laughing with me. He was an expert at talking facts then gradually veering into the ridiculous, often catching me off-guard. --Vic You can't leave this sort of humor around for Herring. He's...not quite all there in the head. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:51:36 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:28:28 -0400, John H. wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:22:30 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jun 18, 10:23?am, wrote: On Jun 18, 8:48?am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:25:29 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You must home school your children, it's way too dangerous to allow them on a school bus, and those school hallways are just way unsafe, what with hard walls and floors, a fall could be a disaster As hard as this maybe to believe, I've actually run into this exact justification fo rhome schooling. No joke. ?:) One of the stooges who has been the most verbose about this seems to not know too much This link clearly disputes his opinion: http://whatparentsshouldrealize.blog...ngerous-things... There are many, many studies linking linking parents overprotecting children and stress, drug use, social withdrawel, inability to cope with anxious moments, etc. I forgot, we also should never, EVER teach them to ride things like motorcyles responsibly. They may then grow up to be responsible adults and not need someone to do their thinking for them. I told all my kids about motorcycles - "You can't have one, and don't get on one. Won't matter what a fantastically skilled and safe rider you are when a car or truck pops you off the bike." Of course we always lived in the city or close in burbs. Lots of traffic. Might have done different in the sticks. There's a million ways to teach responsibility. Take them sky diving and teach them to rig their own chute. Have them test the ice when ice fishing season starts. Safe boating practices comes right to mind. Just make sure every time they do something right they don't get whipped. You need positive reinforcement of good behavior. Fiscal responsibility is best taught early on. What I did with mine was pay them a quarter to not eat dinner, then charge them 20 cents for breakfast. There were 7 of them, and they were allowed to pool resources, so they learned teamwork too. They all did just fine last I knew. Haven't heard from them in some years. Remember what Ann Landers said. "Your children don't come from you. They come through you." That was one wise lady. --Vic Vic, do you really think you did a good job when you've not heard from them in some years? It's hard to communicate from the penitentiary. Damn, I have to stop this. John, except for first and last parts it was BS. Just seeing if anybody pays attention. I salute you! I was thinking of my late uncle Russ, who used to tell me these tall tales all the time. He was a pleasure to fish with. I can still see his eyes watching me as he'd spin a yarn, some true, some half-true, and some all BS. He was watching to see what I was believing, so he could either continue or start laughing with me. He was an expert at talking facts then gradually veering into the ridiculous, often catching me off-guard. --Vic Oh crap, I've been had! I knew there was something in the first part that didn't jibe with the last part! -- John *H* |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I guess I was right. Now what thread precipitated this one? I'm going to have to google it up. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child.... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr.... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It was a troll.. and you answered him several times.. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 2:37*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ypu're just not QUITE bright enough to answer the question, huh? |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:36*pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child.... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr.... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I guess I was right. Now what thread precipitated this one? I'm going to have to google it up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My thread, clearly marked OT.. I ignore the trolls though, Remember the same guy bitching about us taking our kids in full gear riding, wants our 10 yo daughters to be able to elect surgery without our permission.. Just like Salty the CT Democrat.. It's all about agenda, not history or common sense... they both probably rode as kids. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:36*pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child.... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr.... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I guess I was right. Now what thread precipitated this one? I'm going to have to google it up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Remember, most of these elite trolls probably had their kids on boats without jackets, or horses without kevlar too.. But they would never admit it now... They are just here to troll me and loogie, and one of us is not playing.. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It was a troll.. and you answered him several times.. Actually Scott it was not a troll but an honest and balanced discussion of the matter at hand. Did you read it? |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:53*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jun 18, 3:41*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It was a troll.. and you answered him several times.. Actually Scott it was not a troll but an honest and balanced discussion of the matter at hand. Did you read it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Breaking the agreement once here in an OT post.. I did not read it and was not addressing it. I was refering to Harry and the new liberal ideologue here from my home state. The one that already slipped and let us know it is really about the noise, you know, one of those guys that thinks everything he does is ok, but everyone else sucks.... |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:56*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 3:53*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 3:41*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07*pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It was a troll.. and you answered him several times.. Actually Scott it was not a troll but an honest and balanced discussion of the matter at hand. Did you read it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Breaking the agreement once here in an OT post.. I did not read it and was not addressing it. I was refering to Harry and the new liberal ideologue here from my home state. The one that already slipped and let us know it is really about the noise, you know, one of those guys that thinks everything he does is ok, but everyone else sucks.... What agreement? |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 18, 3:49*pm, wrote:
On Jun 18, 3:36*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I guess I was right. Now what thread precipitated this one? I'm going to have to google it up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My thread, clearly marked OT.. I ignore the trolls though, Remember the same guy bitching about us taking our kids in full gear riding, wants our 10 yo daughters to be able to elect surgery without our permission.. Just like Salty the CT Democrat.. It's all about agenda, not history or common sense... they both probably rode as kids.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll tell you, people here are whining about us teaching and allowing our kids to responsibly have fun, yet they claim to have been forced into labor at a large marina and boat repair facility, a truly dangerous place. Running steering cable can be very dangerous, you could easily put an eye out with the cable, or lose a finger. Fueling boats is extremely dangerous. And what about someone's parent showing their child that it is a great idea to take a runabout across the Atlantic? THAT person must have been a horrible parent. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
Take away Loogy...he's a dangerous ****ing COWARD |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
|
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
and one of us is not playing.. Thats cause he's a COWARD ****. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:37 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35 pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ypu're just not QUITE bright enough to answer the question, huh? ==================================== On June 5th didn't loogy post the following? "I will completely ignore the three stooges who left (because, in their words, this placed what horrible) but now came back (can't figure out WHY seeing this place is horrible). I will ignore their vile, nasty, dispicable lies and personal attacks on people. I will even ignore their low life attempts to lie and say nasty untrue things about people's wives and children. In the immortal words of a sub-human PLOINK! (hey, that feels good!)" |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 20, 10:14*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:37 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35 pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ypu're just not QUITE bright enough to answer the question, huh? ==================================== On June 5th didn't loogy post the following? "I will completely ignore the three stooges who left (because, in their words, this placed what horrible) but now came back (can't figure out WHY seeing this place is horrible). I will ignore their vile, nasty, dispicable lies and personal attacks on people. I will even ignore their low life attempts to lie and say nasty untrue things about people's wives and children. In the immortal words of a sub-human PLOINK! (hey, that feels good!)" He blames others yet does not understand that *he* is the problem. His posts this morning confirm that, including his trashing a boating thread I started. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
JimH wrote:
On Jun 20, 10:14 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 2:37 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35 pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ypu're just not QUITE bright enough to answer the question, huh? ==================================== On June 5th didn't loogy post the following? "I will completely ignore the three stooges who left (because, in their words, this placed what horrible) but now came back (can't figure out WHY seeing this place is horrible). I will ignore their vile, nasty, dispicable lies and personal attacks on people. I will even ignore their low life attempts to lie and say nasty untrue things about people's wives and children. In the immortal words of a sub-human PLOINK! (hey, that feels good!)" He blames others yet does not understand that *he* is the problem. His posts this morning confirm that, including his trashing a boating thread I started. JimH, I am curious what you think about Harry, who has openly stated many times that he ONLY reads and posts in rec.boats to watch the (pick one) idiots, morons, assholes, low life's, scum, etc. make fools out of themselves. Some people take this and any NG way to seriously, and take insults and comments from others personally. Harry loves to pull their strings and has made a 15 yr career out of doing so in rec.boats. As you have said in 1000's of your posts to rec.boats, no one has had a negative impact on rec.boats as much as Harry. Now that you are Harry's friend you ignore his comments, but if you were honest with yourself you would admit this is true. Should loogie ignore Harry and not take any of his comments seriously? Sure! Absolutely! But Harry has always known who to tweak to get a great flame fest going, and Loogie is one of his favorite people to tweak today. It used to be you, and the fact that you were a non boating asshole, RepubliNazi, a Krazy Konservative Khristian, KonservaTrash who lived in a cookie cutter boring home, in a boring white bread and mayo suburb. Whom he directs the insults towards may change, but the insults are the same ones he used 15 yr ago. |
OT Anyone with children or with friends that have children
On Jun 20, 11:00*am, JimH wrote:
On Jun 20, 10:14*am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jun 18, 2:37 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:35 pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote: On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote: A *balanced* view on the subject. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756... Here's some more balance: We can't feed them meat: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm Can't let them sleep in a car seat: http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true Can't let them play football: http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071 Can't take them to the emergency room for anything: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child... Can't let them play with toys: http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr... Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with soft walls. OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I think I know. What was the name of the thread? That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to control himself.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly participate in sports is somehow a bad parent? I rest my case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ypu're just not QUITE bright enough to answer the question, huh? ==================================== On June 5th didn't loogy post the following? "I will completely ignore the three stooges who left (because, in their words, this placed what horrible) but now came back (can't figure out WHY seeing this place is horrible). I will ignore their vile, nasty, dispicable lies and personal attacks on people. I will even ignore their low life attempts to lie and say nasty untrue things about people's wives and children. In the immortal words of a sub-human PLOINK! (hey, that feels good!)" He blames others yet does not understand that *he* is the problem. His posts this morning confirm that, including his trashing a boating thread I started.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, did you just maybe happen to notice that when you and your boyfriend Hairy weren't posting your lies and bull**** here for a peaceful couple of weeks that the tone of the group was great, everyone getting along, having fun? Did you then notice that when you and your boyfriend Hairy returned and once again started your lies, insults and bull**** that it became the same old same old?? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com