On May 20, 1:07*pm, JimH wrote:
On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:



*Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

--
John *H*

As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

Negative comments of observations would not be allowed there depending
on where you stand with the mods.. maybe he can't say that stuff
there...

On May 20, 1:13*pm, wrote:
On May 20, 1:07*pm, JimH wrote:





On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:

*Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

--
John *H*

As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

Negative comments of observations would not be allowed there depending
on where you stand with the mods.. maybe he can't say that stuff
there...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I should add an "in my opinion" to that assesment, now I am done with
you too...

On May 20, 1:16 pm, wrote:
On May 20, 1:13 pm, wrote:



On May 20, 1:07 pm, JimH wrote:

On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:

Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

--
John *H*

As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

Negative comments of observations would not be allowed there depending
on where you stand with the mods.. maybe he can't say that stuff
there...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

....now I am done with
you too...

LOL! That is about the 5th time you said that.

wrote:
On May 20, 1:07 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:



Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.
--
John *H*
As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

Negative comments of observations would not be allowed there depending
on where you stand with the mods.. maybe he can't say that stuff
there...


Negative comments or observations about what, Scotty? Chuck put up a
commentary of one of the Bayliners he wrote about recently, and I freely
and openly took a couple of "cheap shots" at the boat. Nothing happened
to me. I've also taken a couple of shots at "Big Oil." Nothing happened.

Now, if I put up a post that accused another poster there of being a
flaming assh*le, well, I would expect to hear from the management and if
I repeated that sort of stuff, I would expect to be deleted.

You managed to get yourself deleted after one post. Of course, you
*invited* the management there to killfile you, so you got what you
wanted, right?

I haven't had any problems at the other place. I simply ignore the
couple of troublemakers there who have tried to get "engaged."