Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."

They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.

Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!

Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.

So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.


--
John *H*

On May 20, 11:09*am, John H. wrote:
Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."

They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.

Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!

*Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.

So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.

--
John *H*

They are done here.. we are getting boating posts again.

On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:
Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."

They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.

Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!

Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.

So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.

--
John *H*

How old did you say you were? It sound like something a couple of
preteen girls would be texting to their friends.

Take your insults elsewhere, you will not get a response from here if
all goes well...

wrote:
Take your insults elsewhere, you will not get a response from here if
all goes well...


Just,
You are absolutely correct. The ONLY way to get rid of those whose only
reason for coming to rec.boats is to egg people and stir things up into
a "pig pile" is to ignore them. I sign onto the agreement. As far as
i am concerned, the 3 stooges don't exist.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:
Take your insults elsewhere, you will not get a response from here if
all goes well...


Just,
You are absolutely correct. The ONLY way to get rid of those whose only
reason for coming to rec.boats is to egg people and stir things up into
a "pig pile" is to ignore them. I sign onto the agreement. As far as
i am concerned, the 3 stooges don't exist.


So...you'll be ignoring yourself?

John H. wrote:
Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."

They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.

Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!

Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.

So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.




There he goes again, instigating "trouble."

"John H." wrote in message
...
Jim said, "They're already back. Can't you smell em? ..."

They're back, and they're accomplishing their goal, which is to make this
place a pile of ****. In case no one's noticed, they're doing it
intentionally, in collusion with each other. It's hard as hell not to
respond to their flat out lies, name-calling, and dip**** comments, but
think about their goal.

Just this morning there were about 25 posts either from Harry, JimH or Don
White, or posts directed at them. Imagine a newbie with a boating question
or comment finding this place only to see the stream of **** generated by
those three - AND RESPONDED TO BY US!

Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get
rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

May I suggest that if we must respond, we go to Chuck's Place and send
them
a personal message, or respond by email. They will say they ignore the
messages, but we know better. They couldn't.

So, anyway, FWIW, there's my two cents.


--
John *H*

There we go... back to your instigating & agitating ways again. Time for
another Goofy cruise to nowhere?

On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:


Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.


--
John *H*

As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

On May 20, 1:07*pm, JimH wrote:
On May 20, 11:09 am, John H. wrote:



*Of the total posts in Chuck's Place, half have been made by three people,
Chuck, JimH, and Harry. Obviously, Chuck could care less what JimH and
Harry do over here. He could easily stop it, by just telling them to stop
or get 'chucked'. But, it's not in the interest of Chuck's place to get rid
of almost a third of the potential posts over there.

--
John *H*

As of this minute - Top 6 poste:

Chuck - 264 posts
JimH - 175 posts
Harry - 171 posts
Tom - 125 posts
JohnH - 90 posts
WayneB - 76 posts

For all your bitching about Chuck and his board you seem to enjoy
posting there.

Strange.

Negative comments of observations would not be allowed there depending
on where you stand with the mods.. maybe he can't say that stuff
there...