JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults
is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.
Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.

We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't
believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be
the business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for
his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for
that, but not for the sex.
I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.

If prostitution is decriminalized, well, then, it isn't a crime, is it?

Stupid laws should be fought. If we followed your example, we'd still
have segregation.
We have an established way to change those laws you call stupid. It is
called the legislative process. You are free to encourage your Democrat
brothers and sisters to offer a bill decriminalizing prostitution. Or, you
can go and have a state or municipality enact a law decriminalizing
prostitution.

I am suprised the party of low morales and no ethics, the Democrat party,
hasn't gotten this accomplished yet.


It's already legal in two states, although heavily regulated.



Try and get the law passed today and tell me how much the pro
prostitution side looses by.