On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:06:38 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:16:44 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:40:52 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:10:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:25hgt350rqm3rp3qf5ddo56f8fpvhfq6pl@4ax .com...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:31:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:6k7gt31p608ht8ao4ae9ps8llnr5gi638s@4 ax.com...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
news:EI2dnWbACPl_WEranZ2dnUVZ_vTinZ2d@c omcast.com...
HK wrote:
Valgard Toebreakerson wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H.
wrote:

why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is
a
Democrat,
although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a
Republican is
involved in a sex scandal.

It couldn't be media bias, could it?

http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms

The undereducated must never know the truth, else the
Democrats
may
lose
their base.

Got a better one for you.

Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what
political
affiliation the mayor of Detroit is.

Oh - the reason?

He's involved with the murder a hooker.

And covering/obstructing the investigation.


Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by
political
party
because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of
"family
values,"
and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out
the
various
sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans.
My
favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays.

One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the
Democrat
party
has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct.

Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above
the
bar
aren't a great party, that's the Democrats.



Democrats are less likely to suggest that people live like
families
which
only exist in books written for toddlers.


From what I've seen, you could put your period after the word
'families'
in
your sentence above.
--
John


That's because you're lying. Or, because you don't see much. Don't
fret
about it. It's a plague.


You, Harry, and JimH sure seem to want to put a lying moniker on me.

I don't do it, and I don't much like those who do.

When I look at the out of wedlock birth statistics in DC and then
look
at
the percent of Democrats in DC, I get the idea that families don't
mean
much.

IOW, Democrats are less likely to suggest people live like families.
--
John


I get the idea you either flunked statistics, or never bothered to
take
a
course. Fortunately, your lack of knowledge in that area affects
nobody
but
yourself.


IOW, nothing.
--
John


In other studies, income level is correlated to out of wedlock births.
Your
"study" seems to point to something nobody else has ever noticed:
political
labels. Maybe you should get in touch with some of the bigger polling
companies and inform them of your discovery.

Do you know the difference between cause and correlation?


I'm not referring to 'studies'. I'm referring to facts.
--
John


The "facts" are the real people and the things they do, or things which
happen to them. The people and the childbirths are real. The meaning you
assign to them is not real. It's an interpretation.

If you can find a reputable statistician who connects out of wedlock
pregnancies with political affiliation in a meaningful way, then I'll
agree
with you. Until then, you're just being disruptive.


Do you think all those out of wedlock mothers. or their mothers, in DC are
voting Republican?
--
John


It doesn't matter to me. You're making the connection. Real people who study
these things say income is the issue, not political affiliation.

I don't see the information you were told to find. Turn off the TV and find
it.


Oh, I see. Well, if the truth doesn't matter to you, go to bed.

Good night.
--
John