On Mar 10, 3:21*pm, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:55:25 GMT, Hump De Hump Hump
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ypbtj2

Heh, heh, heh - payback is a bitch.

Which is worse, seeing a prostitute or stashing $90,000 worth of bribe
money? *The (dis)Honorable William Jefferson ought to be in jail.

Usually, we wait for the indictment, trial, and finding of guilty before
putting people in jail. Well, it used to be that way in this country. No
longer, eh?

He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

On Mar 10, 3:27*pm, wrote:
On Mar 10, 3:21*pm, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:55:25 GMT, Hump De Hump Hump
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ypbtj2

Heh, heh, heh - payback is a bitch.

Which is worse, seeing a prostitute or stashing $90,000 worth of bribe
money? *The (dis)Honorable William Jefferson ought to be in jail.

Usually, we wait for the indictment, trial, and finding of guilty before
putting people in jail. Well, it used to be that way in this country. No
longer, eh?

He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

Strike that, he is not named in the indictment at this time.. He may
snake out of it...

On Mar 10, 3:30*pm, wrote:
On Mar 10, 3:27*pm, wrote:





On Mar 10, 3:21*pm, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:55:25 GMT, Hump De Hump Hump
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/ypbtj2

Heh, heh, heh - payback is a bitch.

Which is worse, seeing a prostitute or stashing $90,000 worth of bribe
money? *The (dis)Honorable William Jefferson ought to be in jail.

Usually, we wait for the indictment, trial, and finding of guilty before
putting people in jail. Well, it used to be that way in this country. No
longer, eh?

He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

Strike that, he is not named in the indictment at this time.. He may
snake out of it...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well he is talking about "real change" in NY, he is definately going
to run for VP....

wrote:
On Mar 10, 3:27 pm, wrote:
On Mar 10, 3:21 pm, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:55:25 GMT, Hump De Hump Hump
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ypbtj2
Heh, heh, heh - payback is a bitch.
Which is worse, seeing a prostitute or stashing $90,000 worth of bribe
money? The (dis)Honorable William Jefferson ought to be in jail.
Usually, we wait for the indictment, trial, and finding of guilty before
putting people in jail. Well, it used to be that way in this country. No
longer, eh?
He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

Strike that, he is not named in the indictment at this time.. He may
snake out of it...


Indicted for what? Hiring a hooker?

wrote in message
...


He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

--------------------

Nope. That spot is already reserved, according to both Hillary and Bill.
Only problem is .... they forgot to inform Obama.

What a couple of sleazy politicians. I am very much enjoying watching the
Democratic party destroy itself in blind ambition.
Oh .... gee .... looks like Florida and Michigan will be re-done, probably
at the tax payer's expense.

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead of
getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...


He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

--------------------

Nope. That spot is already reserved, according to both Hillary and Bill.
Only problem is .... they forgot to inform Obama.

Obama is trying to figure out why the popular vote doesn't count now but
it did count in 2000. Or is it the delegate count? It is so confusing.

What a couple of sleazy politicians. I am very much enjoying watching the
Democratic party destroy itself in blind ambition.
Oh .... gee .... looks like Florida and Michigan will be re-done, probably
at the tax payer's expense.

Obama will most likely win both of them.

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead of
getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.

Situational voting.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...


He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

--------------------

Nope. That spot is already reserved, according to both Hillary and Bill.
Only problem is .... they forgot to inform Obama.

Obama is trying to figure out why the popular vote doesn't count now but
it did count in 2000. Or is it the delegate count? It is so confusing.

What a couple of sleazy politicians. I am very much enjoying watching
the Democratic party destroy itself in blind ambition.
Oh .... gee .... looks like Florida and Michigan will be re-done,
probably at the tax payer's expense.

Obama will most likely win both of them.

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead of
getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.

Situational voting.


Hillary reminds us daily that she "won" Michigan.
She doesn't tell you that her name was the only one on the ballot.

Eisboch

BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...


He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

--------------------

Nope. That spot is already reserved, according to both Hillary and
Bill. Only problem is .... they forgot to inform Obama.

Obama is trying to figure out why the popular vote doesn't count now but
it did count in 2000. Or is it the delegate count? It is so confusing.

What a couple of sleazy politicians. I am very much enjoying watching
the Democratic party destroy itself in blind ambition.
Oh .... gee .... looks like Florida and Michigan will be re-done,
probably at the tax payer's expense.

Obama will most likely win both of them.

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead of
getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.

Situational voting.


The popular vote did not count in 2000.

HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...


He has been indicted, it was unsealed this morning.. now he is free to
take the VP spot under Billary

--------------------

Nope. That spot is already reserved, according to both Hillary and
Bill. Only problem is .... they forgot to inform Obama.

Obama is trying to figure out why the popular vote doesn't count now
but it did count in 2000. Or is it the delegate count? It is so
confusing.

What a couple of sleazy politicians. I am very much enjoying
watching the Democratic party destroy itself in blind ambition.
Oh .... gee .... looks like Florida and Michigan will be re-done,
probably at the tax payer's expense.

Obama will most likely win both of them.

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead
of getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.

Situational voting.


The popular vote did not count in 2000.

Your are correct. The constitution specifies that the president shall be
elected by the members of the electoral college. Some thing you and your
friends in the Democrat party have forgotten is that we are the United
*STATES* of America.

"HK" wrote in message
...

BAR wrote:

Eisboch wrote:

Sorta like being called for clipping in the Super Bowl, but instead of
getting a penalty, they'll just do away with *that* rule.


Situational voting.



The popular vote did not count in 2000.

If Gore had been Hillary, he would have just sued Congress to repeal the
Electoral College and declared himself the victor.

Eisboch