Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default Your President At Work


"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:J7Byj.36101$w94.20623@pd7urf2no...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...


Solar, although getting better, is still less efficient than wind.

Eisboch


Solar is oversold. 2 huge problems. Does not work well if you have a
cloudy week and at nights. Then you have to store the power to use it.

And that is before one gets to needing many acres of land to get a
meaningful quality. And by the way, using lots of plastics made from oil
to make the cells...funny.


Plastic? Don't think so. State of the art cells are doped silicon (plenty
of that around) which are then further processed with protective and
conductive coatings. Recent advances in the optical assemblies that focus
more of the available sunlight onto the cells is one of the significant
reasons for improved efficiency. About 25 years ago solar cell efficiency
was, at best, 15 percent.
Today it's up to a mind boggling 18-20 percent. Long ways to go.

Solar and wind are still a long, long ways from being a viable energy
alternative to replace fossil fuel. The 100,000 megawatt capacity of the
nuclear plants currently operating in the US only supplies about 20 percent
of consummed power.
Solar and/or wind can't even be considered to make up the difference, let
alone replace oil and nuc altogether.

Eisboch



  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 864
Default Your President At Work

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:07:50 -0500, Eisboch wrote:



Solar and wind are still a long, long ways from being a viable energy
alternative to replace fossil fuel. The 100,000 megawatt capacity of
the nuclear plants currently operating in the US only supplies about 20
percent of consummed power.
Solar and/or wind can't even be considered to make up the difference,
let alone replace oil and nuc altogether.


I'm not sure about that. In this country, wind energy alone, accounts
for 13,000 megawatts, most installed in the last 5 years, and there are
estimates that wind alone, could provide twice our present energy needs.

Portugal expects 45% of their energy needs to be met by renewable energy
by 2015. Germany isn't far behind.

I don't think anyone expects *one* silver bullet. It's going to take
conservation, new technologies, and, perhaps, most importantly, a
comprehensive national energy policy, which this present administration
doesn't seem to have the stomach for. I'm not saying it will be easy,
but it can be done, and solar/wind should be part of the mix.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our next president Doug Kanter General 75 April 29th 06 12:06 PM
I am the President! Capt. Neal® ASA 180 December 7th 04 10:51 AM
( OT) Help your president Jim General 25 April 21st 04 04:51 PM
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? Jim General 1 March 30th 04 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017